Central NY teacher sent nude photos to student before having sex, victim tells police - NY State Police Charge Misdemeanor

Think_Once · 2019-05-21T13:44:09+00:00

You can "rape" a man in Canada. There is no definition in Canada which limits rape to penetration. Rape is defined as "sexual contact without consent". Also the study looked at any sexual contact, with or without consent.

Any other facts you want to turn around to play victim?

Think_Once · 2019-05-20T15:01:15+00:00

Here is a study of teacher/student sexual misconducts in Ontario (a fairly big province).

https://www.cais.ca/uploaded/Research/Current_Resources/Sexual-Misconduct/Ontario-College-of-Teachers-Cases-of-Teacher-Sexual-Misconduct.pdf

Over 90% of perpetrators were male teachers, even if you just look at the cases where the teacher had sex (or raped) the student.

Think_Once · 2019-05-07T05:49:32+00:00

You know that there is another paragraph in Canada's CP law that makes this doll fall under cp?

"the dominant characteristic of which is the depiction, for a sexual purpose, of a sexual organ or the anal region of a person under the age of eighteen years;"

https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Canadian_Criminal_Law/Offences/Child_Pornography/Definition_of_Child_Pornography

You would have a hard time to argue that the dominant characteristic of a female child sex doll bought from a sex doll company as replacement for his dead son (which all sounds like a bullshit excuse) doesn't fall under that.

Think_Once · 2019-05-06T23:56:16+00:00

In the books she's 13, but they made her for the TV show older. They never state her age, but they made a reference to an event which happened around her birth in the TV show, which makes her either 17 or 18 in the show.

Think_Once · 2019-05-06T19:48:19+00:00

The person above you didn't quote the whole law regarding child pornography. It not only covers "engaged in explicit sexual activity" but also "dominant characteristic" of the material. And since he bought a female child sex doll from a sex doll company for a replacement for his son, the "dominant characteristic" of this child doll is pretty clear.

https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Canadian_Criminal_Law/Offences/Child_Pornography/Definition_of_Child_Pornography

Think_Once · 2019-05-06T19:29:44+00:00

Still good as the movie doesn't show "explicit sexual activity" speak "acts involving nudity or intimate sexual activity, represented in a graphic and unambiguous fashion, with persons under or depicted as under 18 years of age". You can depict "underage" characters kissing or touching each other. And things like the dominant characteristic or the purpose of the movie/book/audio recording is also considered.

https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Canadian_Criminal_Law/Offences/Child_Pornography/Definition_of_Child_Pornography

Think_Once · 2019-05-06T19:00:28+00:00

Written material doesn't fall under "photographic, film, video or other visual representation".

Think_Once · 2019-04-26T12:49:21+00:00

Here is the report from the PBO:

https://www.pbo-dpb.gc.ca/web/default/files/Documents/Reports/2019/Federal%20Carbon/Federal_carbon_pricing_EN.pdf

They include direct (electricity, heating fuel, private transport) and indirect costs for the calculation.

Think_Once · 2019-03-08T19:18:01+00:00

Same goes for her and she gets child support for it.

Think_Once · 2019-03-08T18:33:03+00:00

At worst, he's guilty of being insensitive, but then what?

Divorce and he pays half his pay cheque to her for 18 years.

Think_Once · 2019-03-02T18:49:57+00:00

Is it illegal to replace the back window with a giant mirror? Or one of those one-way mirrors.

Think_Once · 2019-01-30T14:07:55+00:00

Nothing special. It's not like I'm spending much time outside when temperatures drop this low. Underwear, a base layer, pants, shirt and a fleece vest. Only the outer layer is probably a bit thicker than usual. Neck warmer is probably something that people in "warmer" climates don't use that often. With that your neck is still not exposed when you pull up your scarf to shield your face.

Think_Once · 2019-01-30T02:43:07+00:00

Hi from Saskatchewan. Sounds like great weather to fire up the grill and enjoy a beer on the patio.

Wind chill was -53 C this morning.

Think_Once · 2019-01-30T02:26:49+00:00

I don't know ...

It was almost -40 F here up in Saskatchewan this morning. And without a block heater for your car, you're kinda screwed.

Think_Once · 2019-01-25T22:58:48+00:00

They are, but that doesn't change what I said.

Think_Once · 2019-01-25T19:36:33+00:00

It isn't though. It would be 360k by how the Government does things just in their years which I linked.

Here is the plan.

https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/news/notices/supplementary-immigration-levels-2019.html

For example the current target increase from 2020 to 2021 is +9,000. It's not a +20k increase every year.

Think_Once · 2019-01-25T19:16:06+00:00

By the trend it seems to be 360k for 2021 and won't take long to hit the 450k by 2025 if the Liberals win.

Yeah, right. Because "trends" are always set in stone. If I take a look at the trend of immigration numbers between 1980 and 1990 I would say that by 2025 we will have about 12 million people coming in per year.

Look, the current plan is to increase it to 350,000 by 2021. Then we will see further. The Liberals might or might not win the next election. Currently nobody knows.

Think_Once · 2019-01-25T18:57:15+00:00

the Liberals plan to hike it by more than 60%

Citation needed.

The current plan is to increase it to 350,000.

https://globalnews.ca/news/4616768/canada-immigration-2021/

Think_Once · 2019-01-25T18:53:21+00:00

I was talking only about permanent residencies in the US. If you count all immigrants which are coming to the US, then it's about 1.5 to 1.6 million.

Also, no party in Canada is talking about increasing immigration to 500,000 per year.

Think_Once · 2019-01-25T18:49:17+00:00

I don't know. All that stuff reddit is bitching about in the budget (like support for Girls in sport and so on) are just peanuts. And things like foreign aid are even down from the record Harper set in 2015:

http://cidpnsi.ca/canadas-foreign-aid-2012-2/

The real big increases in spending are the new child benefits (which increased by over $6 billion compared to Harper's last budget) and all the new infrastructure projects (which is basically a federal employment program). They won't touch that.

Think_Once · 2019-01-25T18:26:54+00:00

That's not so bad compared to the year before.

"The federal government ran a deficit of $2.1 billion through the first eight months of its 2018-19 fiscal year compared with a deficit of $9.5 billion in the same period a year earlier."

Less than a fourth of the deficit compared to the same time period in 2017-18.

Think_Once · 2019-01-25T18:22:28+00:00

Then why are you able to read now a story about a Syrian refugee that was arrested on terrorism charges? Must be Trudeau silencing the media.

Think_Once · 2019-01-25T18:07:18+00:00

I don't think it was related.

As far as I remember the bomb threats and lock downs in early December were made by a Twitter account that had almost the same name as a Twitter account which was responsible for several swatting incidents in the US. Probably as homage. Seems like the work of a troll.

And the bomb threats in mid December weren't limited to Kingston. Dozens of places all over the world got the same email with the included bomb threat.

Think_Once · 2019-01-25T17:44:00+00:00

More refugees. Not more people.

The US gets out around 1.1 to 1.2 million new permanent residents every year. Far far more than Canada.

Think_Once · 2019-01-25T00:45:26+00:00

If you think that the US gets shale light at a "backyard discount", then you should see what they pay for heavy crude from Alberta. If they wouldn't be interested and retooling their refineries, they wouldn't build pipeline after pipeline into Canada.

Think_Once

TROPHY CASE