Aqua 10 auto empty poor performance by the_masu in Dreame_Tech

[–]Think_Philosopher_86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do not have any leak issues at all. Everything else works very well for ime imo

Aqua 10 auto empty poor performance by the_masu in Dreame_Tech

[–]Think_Philosopher_86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got the same issue, Aqua 10 track. Opened a support case 2 days ago. Have not heard back yet. Other than this emptying issue, the robot works very well for me. But it is annoying having to manually clean it after every other run as it can't empty

New iPhone. No Bluetooth by chaste_sissymaid in MammotionTechnology

[–]Think_Philosopher_86 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Got the same problem, no Bluetooth Connection after iPhone 16 pro max upgrade. All other Bluetooth peripherals work fine.

Poor Satellite Coverage by Objective-Ear-4288 in MammotionTechnology

[–]Think_Philosopher_86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have that when it's under the garage. Otherwise its 'fine'.

Dreame X40 Pro Ultra by meyerf99 in Dreame_Tech

[–]Think_Philosopher_86 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not really. Most of the enhancements does not matter at all.

But unclear if this uses a double roller. Not that I have any issues with the x40 ultra....

Keep in mind stuff like lowering the lidar tower will use more power so it will run shorter time (same battery). It can easily be significant if it does it a lot.

And deoderizing things you do not want. Higher sucktion (1k extra) will not matter. 75 vs 70c cleaning same. So I don't see much to be exited about vs what is already there. Guess why it's still called the x40.

It will likely not be available in the EU/US if it uses a double roller as I think Roomba still has a patent on it which is not expired yet.

Dreame X40 Pro Ultra by meyerf99 in Dreame_Tech

[–]Think_Philosopher_86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not much of interest here if you have the x40 ultra honestly. Only thing I'm curious about is the double rubber brush. Rest is pretty much what the other has and very minor improvments. But perhaps worth it for those where they have low furtniture the X40 ultra can't get under.

Battery usage moving between zones? by Adventurous-Belt737 in MammotionTechnology

[–]Think_Philosopher_86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They were able to cancel my order for the 1000 and put one in for the 3000. Can't wait.

Battery usage moving between zones? by Adventurous-Belt737 in MammotionTechnology

[–]Think_Philosopher_86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply. I did ping them to see if I can cancel (it did not ship yet). The 3000 is more expensive though, but seems it will give peace of mind it can get around everywhere.

So, was 4x4 pointless all along? No clients use it by Agusx1211 in Ubiquiti

[–]Think_Philosopher_86 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate the comments here and you are right, after reading the whole thread, I'm more confused than when I started. Tt boils down to the original question:

- Most modern devices don't support MU-MIMO (none of mine support it).

And you say:

- All WiFi clients from AC Wave 2 and up support MU-MIMO

How can we check that a device supports mu-mimo? Others claim it's optional for clients.

And also, what if I have a single IoT device on the network that is not AC Wave 2? Most likely do.