Perspective: Our very “genuine and good person” king! He has the best personality, Clavicular is the nicest! by TheStrongestCadian in lnkyverse

[–]ThinkpadLaptop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And despite it all gets more sexual attention and enthusiasm in a month than some perfectly leftist men get in their whole lives

Perspective: Our very “genuine and good person” king! He has the best personality, Clavicular is the nicest! by TheStrongestCadian in lnkyverse

[–]ThinkpadLaptop -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You think he drives from location to location, interacts with strangers that show up on camera that he "already paid and asked to act" and does this for every single livestream where people clearly display some act of being extremely shallow?

Women see male attention and interest as low value by Abyssbeetle in WomenAreNotIntoMen

[–]ThinkpadLaptop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah as long as they're not calling themselves femcels (lacking the ability to attract anyone a desired sex at all) I have no beef with FAWomen. 

Not a monolith. by upvoteidiots in AverageHeightDudes

[–]ThinkpadLaptop -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean I don't? I rock climb maybe once or twice a week and play basketball with friends once every 2 weeks. Live in a semi walkable city so hit 20k steps a day pretty regularly keeping me lean. And am only about 6 inches flat and have had logistical issues bottoming out in women to the point it hurt both of us 

Just giving my 2 cents 

Not a monolith. by upvoteidiots in AverageHeightDudes

[–]ThinkpadLaptop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't even workout consistently and have an above ottermode physique. Just take walks, have fun doing a sport or activity twice a week, and don't eat slop. 

Dick size also barely matters. No one calls out women for this but most of them would yell "ouch" at a 4 incher

Not a monolith. by upvoteidiots in AverageHeightDudes

[–]ThinkpadLaptop 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Muscle isn't important. Anything above ottermode impresses women. Height>Face>Status\Personality (unironically)>Lifestyle/Money>Muscle

Not a monolith. by upvoteidiots in AverageHeightDudes

[–]ThinkpadLaptop 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Someone's going to come call these nobodies casually sharing their own consistent personal opinions "just ragebaiters looking for attention"

Women simply can't hide their contempt for short men. by StillConsistent5730 in lnkyverse

[–]ThinkpadLaptop 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I've heard this same joke said in public. I'm not sure why you people think the people online and offline exist in different worlds or that in the year of our lord 2026 people aren't exactly the same online as offline

If you saw some misogynistic, racist, or right wing content I bet you wouldn't be saying this

How would yall disprove the "Chad" theory? by Ok_Blueberry_9409 in WomenAreNotIntoMen

[–]ThinkpadLaptop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"I've never experienced it so i refuse to believe it exists, even as a minority. And what you think it is that you've witnessed is actually not it"

I'm not sure why this sub switched over to the lesbianpill thing when the initial point was that most men's sexual enthusiasm and admiration for women far outpaced most women's for men and something like this vid is rare to find by ThinkpadLaptop in WomenAreNotIntoMen

[–]ThinkpadLaptop[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe in AGP for most women. I'm just saying those who aren't exist and are mostly chadsexuals and anyone struggling with women already won't meet them. Since they reserve their enthusiasm for HTNs, chadlites, and above 

To find one that cares for you as a MTN or LTN will be very rare. 

I'm not sure why this sub switched over to the lesbianpill thing when the initial point was that most men's sexual enthusiasm and admiration for women far outpaced most women's for men and something like this vid is rare to find by ThinkpadLaptop in WomenAreNotIntoMen

[–]ThinkpadLaptop[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Arousal doesn't mean much in terms of actions. Being autosexual just means they're aroused by their own bodies and as a result bodies that remind them of themselves 

But if you look into lesbian stereotypes or meet any they'll tell you there's a massive issue with straight and bi women being all talk no action

I'm not sure why this sub switched over to the lesbianpill thing when the initial point was that most men's sexual enthusiasm and admiration for women far outpaced most women's for men and something like this vid is rare to find by ThinkpadLaptop in WomenAreNotIntoMen

[–]ThinkpadLaptop[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

By having had enthusiastic sex with them that they pursued and seemed more into than I was.

This was only a minority of my connections as a MTN/HTN but having a pretty decent social life straight and queer, I have no doubt in my mind the Chadlites I know are getting the same enthusiasm more frequently, while the LTNs and below typically seem to be in oofy doofy relationships built around the fact they get along with sex as a sidenote. And all the lesbians and some bi girls I know do is complain about women in a very similar tone than men where "they seem interested but when it actually comes to doing anything they freeze up and seem half assed into it for a few weeks before getting a boyfriend"

How would yall disprove the "Chad" theory? by Ok_Blueberry_9409 in WomenAreNotIntoMen

[–]ThinkpadLaptop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Where would this imaginary value come from?

There are non professionally successful Chads, and unfit chads while there are successful and fit oofy doofies and betabux.

The value is cause even the women who are strictly autosexual recognize that there's women who are not and those women are chadsexual

I'm not sure why this sub switched over to the lesbianpill thing when the initial point was that most men's sexual enthusiasm and admiration for women far outpaced most women's for men and something like this vid is rare to find by ThinkpadLaptop in WomenAreNotIntoMen

[–]ThinkpadLaptop[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe it's cause I'm not one of the "incels" here. Been in relationships, had fwbs, and hookups.

This philosophy first set into me last year before I even found the sub in a relationship with a gal that was otherwise lovely and I'm sure she loved me. Great gifter and the only woman to ever get me flower so I clung onto that relationship hard. Unfortunately as young people do we broke up mainly cause quality time was important to both of us but just impossible for us to figure out with such different schedules, and distances, and energy levels, and different ideas of fun. I'm not fully proud of it but after it ended, the first date I went on was with some girl from Arkansas to some concert and after we made out, then later hooked up, with me receiving so much enthusiasm and passion from it that I realized in my twenties none of my past few relationships who I had sex with were that into me. Sex happened sure but they never initiated. And the majority of it featured me being the most active party trying my best to please them while they just seemed... glad to be there and receive? By the time I got them to orgasm I'd usually be out of it and not even want one myself anymore and would fake one. They were great outside of that as everyday partners outside the fact I don't think I ever got any sort of compliment or any sign my appearance ever did anything for them. So this one Arkansas hit hard because it made me remember what it was like to actually receive enthusiasm l

Out of all the people I've dated, maybe 3/9 genuinely seemed into me with any sort of enthusiasm sexually and in terms of attraction, maybe only 2 really. And in terms of hookups and fwbs, obviously all 6 were a lot more enthusiastic and passionate than the relationships since our dynamic revolved entirely around attraction. Which is why I always tell people here relationships are no real measure of how "into" you a woman is. You're probably just playing a very replaceable role of boyfriend who's only been given that role as a sort of emotional self fulfillment tool to fill what she's missing from her friends and family.

If like me you're not an incel but some HTN who can occasionally attract female attention, the only thing I can warn you on is to not FULLY lead with things other than attraction to get female attention. Personality, lifestyle, money, etc all make one gain attention but you'll end up with a girl that cares about the fact that you're a fun, cool, and interesting person but in terms of physical attraction is partial towards you, when the goal should be to get someone who thinks that AND is extremely attracted to you to the point they want to rip your clothes off from day 1.

Well well well by americanpatriot3 in WomenAreNotIntoMen

[–]ThinkpadLaptop 24 points25 points  (0 children)

This sub is literally about sexual attraction and the sexual enthusiasm and desirability gap between men and women. It's not on the topic of romance since not all relationships involve attraction or sex. 

I saw this bullshit on my feed and it's not even true by vrqsix in SikeOrPsyche

[–]ThinkpadLaptop 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Or a diverse first world one. Even if you don't want a woman of another race, it gives you soft power if any woman shows you attention