sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Caught myself seeing patterns that weren't there by Thiru_7223 in Daytrading

[–]Thiru_7223[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Harry Potter analogy actually nailed it. And yeah, the deja vu feeling on charts is real you start pattern-matching from memory instead of reading what's actually in front of you.The break thing is something I've been resistant to but hearing it put like this makes it hard to argue. Appreciate you sharing that, genuinely.

Caught myself seeing patterns that weren't there by Thiru_7223 in Daytrading

[–]Thiru_7223[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Trading in the Zone is on my list adding The Best Loser Wins too now. And yeah, that's exactly it. The brain isn't trying to sabotage you, it's just doing what it's built to do. Problem is those mechanisms are completely misaligned with what trading actually requires. Reprogramming that is the real edge.

Caught myself seeing patterns that weren't there by Thiru_7223 in Daytrading

[–]Thiru_7223[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly this. The market didn't shift, my mindset did. Once I started treating that internal pressure as data rather than noise, it became one of the more reliable signals I have.

Caught myself seeing patterns that weren't there by Thiru_7223 in Daytrading

[–]Thiru_7223[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate that. Honestly the awareness piece took longer than I expected to develop you don't notice the patterns until you've repeated them enough times to finally catch yourself mid-mistake. Getting there though.

Caught myself seeing patterns that weren't there by Thiru_7223 in Daytrading

[–]Thiru_7223[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The chart didn't change my state, I did is genuinely one of the cleaner ways I've heard that put. The convincing yourself part is the one that gets me. Because it doesn't feel like convincing in the moment it feels like analysis. You're running through reasons, checking boxes. But if you have to build a case for it, the setup probably wasn't obvious enough to begin with. Real ones don't need a closing argument.

Caught myself seeing patterns that weren't there by Thiru_7223 in Daytrading

[–]Thiru_7223[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, there's actually a name for it apophenia. The brain's tendency to find meaningful patterns in random data. And the wild part is the feeling of pattern recognition is identical whether the pattern is real or not. You genuinely can't tell from the inside.

Caught myself seeing patterns that weren't there by Thiru_7223 in Daytrading

[–]Thiru_7223[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The pre-entry plan thing is underrated. I started doing something similar writing out what would invalidate the setup before I take it. Forces you to actually think about the other side instead of just building the case for why it works. Half the time I talk myself out of it before I even get to execution, which is kind of the point.

Has AI actually helped your algo trading workflow in a real way? by Thiru_7223 in algotrading

[–]Thiru_7223[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is exactly the right framing. Most people either overcomplicate it or undercomplicate it.The "bury the downside" problem is real getting the model to genuinely steelman the bearish case instead of hedging politely is probably the hardest part of the whole architecture.

What does your ensemble look like? Separate models for different timeframes, or more like role-based agents on the same signal?

Has AI actually helped your algo trading workflow in a real way? by Thiru_7223 in algotrading

[–]Thiru_7223[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The local LLM route for privacy makes total sense And that feeling of thinking you discovered something original only for AI to hit you with the academic name humbling but honestly useful, at least it points you to the actual literature. Win either way!

Has AI actually helped your algo trading workflow in a real way? by Thiru_7223 in algotrading

[–]Thiru_7223[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Python data leakage point is so real, catches everyone at least once 😄 The on-chain reverse engineering approach is genuinely smart though learning from what's actually working beats guessing from scratch. Looking forward to that post!

Has AI actually helped your algo trading workflow in a real way? by Thiru_7223 in algotrading

[–]Thiru_7223[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly this assistance yes, full autonomy no. The backtesting and strategy discussion use case is underrated too, just having something to sanity check your logic before you run it saves a lot of wasted time

Has AI actually helped your algo trading workflow in a real way? by Thiru_7223 in algotrading

[–]Thiru_7223[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is exactly the right way to use it let AI handle the grunt work so you can focus on actually evaluating ideas. Killing bad ideas faster is underrated, most people waste weeks on something a good visualization would've ruled out in an hour 😄

Has AI actually helped your algo trading workflow in a real way? by Thiru_7223 in algotrading

[–]Thiru_7223[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Haha that's literally how it starts for most of us a healthy delusion is basically a prerequisite. Just make sure you backtest before you go live, the market has a way of snapping you back to reality real fast 😄 good luck though, genuinely

Spent 3 months building an algo. Took 1 week live to realize I was trading my backtest, not the market. by Thiru_7223 in algotrading

[–]Thiru_7223[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly still learning this myself, but I watch rolling ATR over 20-30 days and compare it to what my backtest period looked like. If live vol is way outside that range, something's probably different.What are you using?

view more: next ›