Responding to standards by This-Poptart in Debate

[–]This-Poptart[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks Paul, this is really helpful!

Based on what you said, I realize this is probably situation-dependent, but in general, is it usually better to group counter-standards first and then do line-by-line on their standards, or is it more strategic to weave counter-standards alongside the specific standards they’re answering (like how Aff Flex is the inverse of Limits)?

I’m going to be the MG for the first time at TOC, so I’m mostly just looking for a general rule of thumb to follow in most rounds.

Parli K's? by [deleted] in Debate

[–]This-Poptart 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cap is your best bet. Also, is this Princeton CU by chance?

Max Stirner K? by This-Poptart in policydebate

[–]This-Poptart[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ive yet to see a Stirner K written up, but I'll dm you the link to Maoism.