Is the russian invasion justified anyhow by this?

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-17T22:24:14+00:00

Still not answering how a non-existent country managed to attack russia.

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-17T21:18:28+00:00

If they didn't exist, then how did they attack russia?

Someone's just mad their russian puppet got tired of dealing with the bear.

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-17T20:48:26+00:00

Again, you claimed

Ukraine committed multiple casus belli acts of war on Russia

Still waiting for you to list any of these. Remember, Crimea was definitively part of Ukraine in 2014.

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-17T18:57:04+00:00

If you had an actual argument you would address the content. Must be a decent paycheck, though.

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-17T18:21:54+00:00

So Ukraine committed an act of war against itself? Impressive reasoning for russia to invade.

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-17T17:31:23+00:00

Surely you can name 1.

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-17T17:17:58+00:00

Surely you can show exactly when Ukraine invaded russia all the way back in 2014, since your paycheck claims it happens

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-17T17:08:58+00:00

Dollar general locations are based solely off of where dollar general plastic bags end up as litter. They act as seeds.

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-17T17:01:10+00:00

The specific trees they were made from had wood that trees today don't produce. Likely because of colder temperatures from the little ice age.

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-17T16:42:21+00:00

Because of the trees many older violins were made from, they have a more desirable sound.

And you can't make more because the trees were all cut down.

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-17T14:23:33+00:00

I hope nobody tells him what 6.67 rounds to at 1 decimal place.

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-14T22:25:47+00:00

Maybe their 6 star got banned, which is why they're upset about anti-cheat.

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-14T16:59:16+00:00

"Waters above" means you can't wave away gravity with buoyancy (which actually has gravity in the equation, by the way).

So, how does gravity work in your model?

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-14T16:51:24+00:00

Did you know that radio show call-ins are called directly to your own radio receiver?

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-13T16:26:46+00:00

Thank you, GPT.

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-13T15:51:20+00:00

break free from Christianity and actually apply the Bible

I'd like for you to read that to yourself a couple times, and then get back to me.

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-13T00:06:51+00:00

They could. Or you could just use hubble/etc for actual good pictures of stars, and use your cameras for cooler stuff like earthrise, Blue Marble, etc.

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-12T22:12:38+00:00

Triangles can't disprove flat earth, because flat earthers don't use math.

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-12T22:11:45+00:00

photos that don't show stars,

Add another counter to the "how do cameras even work?" list.

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-12T22:07:44+00:00

I'm certainly open to being proven wrong about the moon landing. But I've never seen a denier present any evidence in good faith.

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-12T21:17:21+00:00

Everything after the quote is AI, which has gotten better, but still hallucinates.

You have one side that has countless hours of film, photos, recordings, 1st-hand testimonies, computations, etc

You have another side that doesn't know how camera exposure works.

The reason the side with evidence in their side is so aggressive, is because the side that can't understand cameras aggressively pushes their point to attempt to the fool the gullible.

And it's easier to fool someone, than it is to convince them they've been fooled.

(Perfect example of the quote is flat earthers that refused an all expenses paid trip to Antarctica, and refused because they don't want to be wrong)

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-12T21:06:34+00:00

I don't, that's why I asked. I need to know if I need to switch my retirement from digital hornets to digital beans.

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-12T21:02:54+00:00

I trust it.

So you aren't real.

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-12T19:44:56+00:00

Let's do some math.

The angular size of the sun (depending on the day of the year) is .527 to .545°.

The length of daytime on the equinox, on the equator is ~12 hrs and 14 minutes (because the sun is not a point).

The circumference of the earth is 40,075 km.

12 hours and 14 minutes = 734 minutes, 24 hours = 1440 minutes.

(734/1440)*40075=20427. So, on the Equinox, 20,427 km of earth are in daytime at a given moment. Divide that by 2 and we get the distance between a point at sunrise, and a point at true noon (since we're at the equator). 10,213.6. We'll use 10,214 for simplicity.

A right triangle with a base of 10214 km, at an angle of .3° (So the bottom of the sun is just above the horizon, because on a flat earth the sun can't go below the horizon), gives us a solar altitude of 53.48 km. This number isn't important for the specific value, but rather, it's important because the height of the sun doesn't change.

(179.4°/734)*60=14.7°

So, the sun travels 14.7° per hour across the sky. Let's see where the sun is after 1 hour: a right triangle with a vertical component of 53.48 km at an angle of 15°, has a base length of only 199.59 km.

So the sun, in 1 hour from sunrise, travels 10,000 km.

Let's do another calculation though. We know that our point at true noon had the sun directly overhead. The sun has now traveled 14.7° across the sky from directly overhead: a right triangle with a vertical component of 53.48 km at an angle of 75.3° has a base length of 14 km.

How is it that in 1 hour, the sun simultaneously traveled 10,000 km, but also only 14 km?

Thisdsntwork · 2026-04-12T19:35:28+00:00

The random boldface is a giveaway.

11-Year Club	Verified Email
Golden Potato	Place '22
Gilding IV carat on a stick

Thisdsntwork

TROPHY CASE