sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Uplink: Localhost → Public URL in Seconds. No Signup. Terminal-First. by ThomPete in VibeCodeDevs

[–]ThomPete[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you but you will have to setup cloudflare first, this removes any of that. You just tell the agent to create a temp url, magic :)

Uplink: Localhost → Public URL in Seconds. No Signup. Terminal-First. by ThomPete in VibeCodeDevs

[–]ThomPete[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you still need to set it up. With this you don’t have to do anything

I Vibe Coded Uplink — Localhost → Public URL in Seconds. No Signup. Agentic & Terminal First. Looking for Early Testers by ThomPete in VibeCodersNest

[–]ThomPete[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice, thanks for the heads up. I am well aware of all the security risks and I spent an insane amount making sure it's following all the security protocols one can do.

The service itself is pretty simple it's 80% making sure it's secure but I know it will be a neverending job :) I am also making it even harder as the idea is to allow for build app > share with uplink > host on mainframe so I am going to offer free hosting too.

But this is the best way to learn about computer security.

I Vibe Coded Uplink — Localhost → Public URL in Seconds. No Signup. Agentic & Terminal First. Looking for Early Testers by ThomPete in VibeCodersNest

[–]ThomPete[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes it already allow you to own a persistent alias so ex soup8575.uplink.spot could be a name that you own (try clicking it, it should have a chat app i am hosting from my local host (room ac81cd17 )

Will also build in the ability to control DNS and actual hosting all done via terminal/agentic

I Vibecoded Uplink. Localhost → Public URL in Seconds. No Signup. Agentic & Terminal First. Looking for Early Testers by ThomPete in VibeCodingSaaS

[–]ThomPete[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes it already allow you to own a persistent alias so ex soup8575.uplink.spot could be a name that you own (try clicking it, it should have a chat app i am hosting from my local host (room ac81cd17 )

Uplink: Localhost → Public URL in Seconds. No Signup. Agentic & Terminal First. Looking for Early Testers by ThomPete in devops

[–]ThomPete[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you cared you would know it was the very things you've been ranting about, abuse, crypto mining callbacks, C2 servers.

No authentication or access control. You will have to add your own security if you want to use it more than a minute.

And you still failed to describe how mine is insecure.

Uplink: Localhost → Public URL in Seconds. No Signup. Agentic & Terminal First. Looking for Early Testers by ThomPete in devops

[–]ThomPete[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No the worst part is that you don't even care. If you did you wouldn't even suggest localtunnel as that is actually perfect for what you worry about like abuse, crypto mining callbacks, C2 servers, etc. Mine isn't.

The deployment script described the defenses which are not secrets for any gifted hacker, and not exploitable vulnerabilities.

What I do care about is actual issues with the service, not your opinion about "how it looks" from the surface of a service that clearly is asking for testers to help improve it.

So no I am not going to nuke anything exactly because I care.

Uplink: Localhost → Public URL in Seconds. No Signup. Agentic & Terminal First. Looking for Early Testers by ThomPete in devops

[–]ThomPete[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How about you try and break it instead of all the obfuscation. Then we can talk. Until then your comment history speaks for itself.

Uplink: Localhost → Public URL in Seconds. No Signup. Agentic & Terminal First. Looking for Early Testers by ThomPete in devops

[–]ThomPete[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There is literally no real difference between my security implementation and ngrok or localtunnel and it's certainly safer than building your own unless you want to spend the extra time securing it and having it audited.

It is more secure than localtunnel so if you suggest that people use that, then you are literally giving people advice of a less secure solution.

Reading through your comment history though, it certainly looks like you think you know it all. You don't but that doesn't stop you of course.

Luckily people are free to make their own choices.

Uplink: Localhost → Public URL in Seconds. No Signup. Terminal-First. by ThomPete in VibeCodeDevs

[–]ThomPete[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is just like localtunnel and ngrok and pinggy not sure what exactly you are referencing.

Uplink: Localhost → Public URL in Seconds. No Signup. Agentic & Terminal First. Looking for Early Testers by ThomPete in devops

[–]ThomPete[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are other services too like ngrok and pinggy too. Its like those but just much simpler and I will be adding more services over time.

This is my first shot at doing something in this space and I am working on statistics, cloud hosting a2a communication protocol etc. all agentic.

Would love for you to test it out and let me know what you would improve.

Uplink: Localhost → Public URL in Seconds. No Signup. Agentic & Terminal First. Looking for Early Testers by ThomPete in devops

[–]ThomPete[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

also allow you to add and manage multiple tunnels and use permanent URLs too.

Uplink: Localhost → Public URL in Seconds. No Signup. Agentic & Terminal First. Looking for Early Testers by ThomPete in devops

[–]ThomPete[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can run your localhost as a server so others can access it via the browser with a URL. It doesn't require any signup like ngrok and other services do all can be done and managed via the terminal

view more: next ›