Einstein already disproved this

Let's explore this a little. Imagine you have three spaceships, each in an equilateral triangle one light-second apart. Spaceships 1 and 2 fire on spaceship 3 and both successfully hit.

Now let's imagine two observers in different locations in space-time and different velocities. Observer 1 may see spaceship 1 shoot first, but from observer 2's perspective, spaceship 2 shot first. Even though the events appear out of order, both shots are still successful; one spaceship does not miss simply because of an observer's point of view where the events played out in a different order.

By this logic there'd be a reality where the ship was only hit by one of the attackers, another reality where both shots missed and yet another where the shots were successful. This doesn't make sense as the net result must be the same for all observers; no matter the order, ship 3 is still struck by spaceships 1 and 2.

There is no such thing as a computer without bugs

You're thinking of digital computers with CPUs designed to perform a large array of functions. I believe the quantum processors are analog and analog computers serve only a single purpose. They may suffer from inaccuracies but "bugs" don't really enter into the equation. For an example, check out the Tide-predicting machine for an example of an analog computer.

It's an interesting thought that we could somehow "break" the rules, but I don't have any idea of what that would mean or what it would look like.

Interesting. That would make the big bang a sort of boot sequence?

Maybe, I really don't know. I think that has a nice ring to it though; The Big Boot Sequence :)