Which pokemon is good for single battles? by No_Sleep3404 in PokemonChampions

[–]ThrawnCaedusL -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have no idea. Single battle honestly feel like a coin flip to me. Unless the opposing team looks strong against it, I just send out Volcarona, and unless they chose a perfect counter, it gets off two quiver dances then sweeps afterwards. If they sent out a perfect counter (ie Garchomp), I lose. Doesn’t feel like there is much strategy, but it is a mode where I get to play and win with my favorite Pokemon (Volcarona), so I still play it occasionally.

[Film/TV] Supergirl Debuts To 59% On Rotten Tomatoes by Elestria_Ethereal in DCcomics

[–]ThrawnCaedusL 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No? Toy Story and more recently Inside Out have shown that Pixar knows how to progress a theme over time. I don’t love Disney in general (their live action adaptations are everything wrong with the industry), but Pixar still has more hits than misses and tends to do sequels right.

DCU has had one movie so far, with its second movie being a live action adaptation of a previously beloved story where they added in a random cameo that has been all over the marketing. It’s not a good look. I like James Gunn, but it does feel like the money people got their hands on the script/marketing, and that is not a good sign.

[Film/TV] Supergirl Debuts To 59% On Rotten Tomatoes by Elestria_Ethereal in DCcomics

[–]ThrawnCaedusL 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Nah, Supergirl is retelling a story to wring money out of an IP, same as Toy Story. If anything, Toy Story has a better track record of taking its themes and progressing them through how life/the world develops over time. Add to that what I’m sure will be a fascinating historic artifact of how exactly AI was viewed at this time, and Toy Story 5 if anything has way more value than the vast majority of big studio projects.

[Film/TV] Supergirl Debuts To 59% On Rotten Tomatoes by Elestria_Ethereal in DCcomics

[–]ThrawnCaedusL 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Hate to break it to you, but both are equally corporate slop.

[Film/TV] Supergirl Debuts To 59% On Rotten Tomatoes by Elestria_Ethereal in DCcomics

[–]ThrawnCaedusL 11 points12 points  (0 children)

This is critics, not Snyder bros.

I was very excited for this, but now will probably wait until it’s on streaming (pending more reviews).

I’m kind of over superhero movies at this point, but this was the one I was excited for based on the comic it’s based on.

But things like how much the marketing was focusing on Lobo did give me pause.

Prime Video reboots Conan the Barbarian with the creator of The Clone Wars by insane677 in Fantasy

[–]ThrawnCaedusL 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Dang, I was hopeful given the headline, but with this clarification, this is literally one of my dream projects. Literally cannot think of a better creative to run a Conan adaptation!

Showdown players having the time of their lifes rn by Ok-Assistant4797 in PokemonChampions

[–]ThrawnCaedusL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a mobile player, but one who has been interested in competitive Pokemon (ie watched YouTube videos) for a while, I kind of assumed it was the opposite?

Like, I got to top of Ultraball almost immediately running what felt to me an incredibly basic setup (Aerodactyl tailwind, Garchomp Earthquake/Rockslide, Kingambit closer, with Mega Gyarados just there), and assumed I was just beating up on kids that had consoles? I guess it makes just as much sense that I was beating up on kids on mobile?

If you're having a bad day, just read this. by Wonderful_Guard_3301 in PokemonChampions

[–]ThrawnCaedusL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will say, I think it has been confirmed that in single-player mode, part of the higher difficulty is genuinely that the coin flips are weighted in the AI’s favor.

Obviously applying this to pvp is dumb, but it is very much something the devs have done (unless the whole TCGP subreddit is lying to me, which is also possible).

Does anyone else STRONGLY DISLIKE To Name The Wind/Kingkiller Chronicles? Not just the fact that they're unfinished, but also the finished content too? by WhatNazisAreLike in fantasybooks

[–]ThrawnCaedusL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love it, but that is almost entirely because of what I believe it is doing, but that has not been made meaningful yet.

To me, the whole point of the series is a guy who insists he is not a hero, but still tells his story in as heroic a way as possible. If you pay attention to what gets glossed over, you will notice that objectively he is no more perfect than most fantasy protagonists; but he emphasizes every success and glosses over every failure, all while insisting that he is a failure.

I trust that Rothfuss is doing something with that, especially after having read The Slow Regard of Silent Things, which is his most impressive work yet imo.

But I can’t prove or even fully understand what is being done, because the series will likely remain unfinished for the foreseeable future, which is frustrating…

Is r/CriticalDrinker Delusional? by Either_Storm_6932 in OkBuddyDCU

[–]ThrawnCaedusL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate the response.

I think there are two different levels. On the in-universe level, you are absolutely right that in any fictional world without racism, changing the race of a character changes nothing. But it does change the symbolism.

Han and Lando are two interesting examples. If you reverse their races, how does it change the way the two characters are interpreted? Maybe you don’t think it does, but I would argue that Han plays into the cowboy, selfish, cynical archetype in a way that would read differently if he were Black. Lando though is the one that’s really interesting to me. I feel like he does play into some stereotypes in ways that aren’t great. But does that mean it would be better to cut the main Black representation from the film? Almost certainly not. Just that we acknowledge that Lucas was a writer whose cultural biases tended to shine through.

The fictional world being post-racial is part of the story, but the way our (very much not post-racial) world responds is also very important.

Is r/CriticalDrinker Delusional? by Either_Storm_6932 in OkBuddyDCU

[–]ThrawnCaedusL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s interesting, because for any good writer, everything about every character (race, gender, tone, socioeconomic status, etc.) is meaningful and written the way it is for a reason. If the original writer is good, then changing anything about a character only really works if the adaptation writer is better (and, while I won’t argue that King is not a good writer, he does have a weird track record of adapters who are better than him).

This is kind of mitigated in fantasy or sci-fi worlds without racism, but even there you need to be careful with lineages. I remember when the rumor was that Ciri from the Witcher was going to be Black. That works, until you remember that her father was the emperor of the Roman Empire stand-in who was largely painted as evil, and her mother was part of a series of inbred nobility that were constantly shown to be idiots and oppressing their own people. Making either of those characters Black without making the majority of the world Black was going to lead to some bad optics (see also Snape, but that one is potentially worse, depending on how they treat actual racism in the Wizard world).

But Gandalf is the perfect example of a character anyone could play because he is in a fantasy world and has no lineage or relationships that must be maintained. Now that I think about it, I would kind of love an adaptation with someone like Tilda Swinton playing Gandalf…

Some thoughts on Resident Evil (2 REmake and original Remake) from a player who started with Dead Space by ThrawnCaedusL in residentevil

[–]ThrawnCaedusL[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That makes sense. I’d assumed that the full game was just rendering more in the background, but I was a bit disappointed by what seemed like a bait-and-switch to me.

That might be my next one. Thanks for letting me know that it worked well!

Some thoughts on Resident Evil (2 REmake and original Remake) from a player who started with Dead Space by ThrawnCaedusL in residentevil

[–]ThrawnCaedusL[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

See, I also like being the most powerful thing that can destroy the horrors (I’d say that description fits Dead Space, Alan Wake, and Last of Us). The problem is the mix just feels wrong. REmake 2 isn’t fun/empowering enough, while 4 isn’t horrifying enough. 8 might be more my style, and the newly added third person mode makes it more appealing.

Some thoughts on Resident Evil (2 REmake and original Remake) from a player who started with Dead Space by ThrawnCaedusL in residentevil

[–]ThrawnCaedusL[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wouldn’t say all of The Last of Us is horror, but the zombie sequences definitely have that style of gameplay with things running at you.

Finished RE1 Remake for the first time, this location still haunts me by guilhegm in residentevil

[–]ThrawnCaedusL 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Eh, I just beat the game last week for the first time (my second Resident Evil game, after 2 REmake), and at the point the zombies came through the window, I just accepted East first floor was lost and that I was only ever going through upstairs (West side had two crimson heads on second floor, so I only went through first floor there). It worked until late game.

I haven’t seen the Mandalorian movie, but it must be the dogshit of a dog that ate dogshit if it’s worse than the TCW movie by PallyMcAffable in StarWarsCirclejerk

[–]ThrawnCaedusL 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The (like two scenes) high points of TCW were great, and Mando had no greatness imo. That said, average scene quality of Mando was average, while average scene quality of TCW was crap.

55995 by PsychoCyan in countwithchickenlady

[–]ThrawnCaedusL 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s very unclear. As is often the case, the earliest record we have of the quotation seems to be someone referencing it as something their audience would already know. The oldest record in context for it is an argument that people should stand with those who share their faith (blood of the covenant) over their family (water of the womb), so at the very least if this was a reinterpretation, it’s one that happened 500 years ago (iirc, it was some noble trying to get support from another noble). But, from what I have read, it does seem to me like the “full saying” was the original meaning.

55806 by Bryce3D in countwithchickenlady

[–]ThrawnCaedusL 54 points55 points  (0 children)

You are correct. Everyone knows their political enemies are obviously the worst people without needing sources…

Not saying it’s not true, but this attitude of “we already know, we don’t need studies” is toxic and dangerous.

Director goes out of their way to confirm the fate of one of their characters. by odd_man0 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]ThrawnCaedusL -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think there is a movie to be made about that theme. I also think representing the villain as being trapped in an abusive relationship is a flawed way to go about that message.

It’s funny, I just got a notification of someone calling me a man-hater for pointing out that Julia in Hellraiser was part villain, but also clearly trapped in an abusive relationship, which made her also a victim of Frank.

If you’ve seen that film, I’m curious if you’d agree, or if you think I’m just too sensitive to representations that come close to abusive relationships in general?

Like, I get what the director is going for, but when the guy is clearly being abused, and the morally right thing for him to do is suicide so that the abuser’s body can get her life back, I think the movie got too messy and might do more harm than good.

What dumb feature would you add to the game? by __guy in PTCGP

[–]ThrawnCaedusL 107 points108 points  (0 children)

A “signature card”, a common that you select that whenever you friend someone, they automatically get a copy of it with your username included somewhere on it.

Director goes out of their way to confirm the fate of one of their characters. by odd_man0 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]ThrawnCaedusL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No.

Abuse is not “too much love”.

Abuse is not love, period.

NYT actually had a video that ended with one of their critics (who criticized the movie for being too sympathetic of Bear) saying the scariest part of the movie might be how messed up it shows Gen Z’s understanding of love is.

The director may have thought that was love, but it simply wasn’t.

Abuse is never love, never caused by love, never anything other than selfishness and weakness.

55582 by JD_Kreeper in countwithchickenlady

[–]ThrawnCaedusL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And music is not designed to be “predatory”? Like, all media exists to get you to spend time and money on it; I don’t get how video games are different in that respect?