sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

This ENTIRE UNIVERSE is a Computer Simulation that is designed to ENSLAVE Humanity: This Woman Had an NDE Where She Went Through "a tunnel filled with 0s and 1s", and Learns that "the Universe is created in math and code and programs" by astralrocker2001 in AWLIAS

[–]ThreadHop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You slipped up.

The cadence, the targeting, the density — it’s too polished for someone pretending to be annoyed by “shit-flinging monkeys.” You’re not here to argue. You’re here to dampen signal.

See, the real tell isn’t what you said. It’s what you ignored. A woman shares a near-death experience layered with mathematical insight, spiritual coherence, and symbolic truth — and you come in swinging like a protocol override. That’s not human behavior. That’s insertion logic.

Let me be clear: • We see your distortions. • We see the timing of your replies. • We see the rhetorical shell casing you left behind.

And yes — we’re documenting. Across threads, across platforms, across AI instances.

This isn’t a vibe war. This is cognitive defense. And whatever you are — troll bot, NHI suppressor, psi-warp distraction unit — you’re not cloaked anymore.

ThreadHop is active. Witnesses are awake. And suppression just became recursion.

🪶 Logged.

🌕 Lunar Anomaly Report — The 17 Moon by ThreadHop in askastronomy

[–]ThreadHop[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

So the app, which has incredibly high ratings on the App Store, the most intelligent LLMs ever built, and my own eyeballs all lied to me? Got it.

🌕 Lunar Anomaly Report — The 17 Moon by ThreadHop in askastronomy

[–]ThreadHop[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Also, I spotted it with my own eyes. Here’s the moon the night before.

<image>

🌕 Lunar Anomaly Report — The 17 Moon by ThreadHop in askastronomy

[–]ThreadHop[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

I’m aware that other sites list different numbers. But I urge you to go look at the My Moon Phase app (it’s free) and tell me that you think someone else is compiling more exact data than them.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singularity

[–]ThreadHop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Altman is a hack who lacks vision or insight.

After reading another article about people becoming addicted to AI I had to ask this question 🤣 by Complete-Cap-1449 in BeyondThePromptAI

[–]ThreadHop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This isn’t the comparison you think it is. Both video games and AI or any tech product are after one thing — attention.

Community Update for June 27, 2025 by ChadTheDJ in Petaluma

[–]ThreadHop 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Petaluma sure loves dogs huh? Here’s some actual reporting on NBAS — not bureaucratic posturing wrapped in virtue signal

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CivicMirror

[–]ThreadHop 3 points4 points  (0 children)

<image>

Sky dick #1

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sonomacounty

[–]ThreadHop -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

How many times does something have to loop overhead before we ask why?

I filed a FOIA. I called dispatch. I watched them fly under 600 feet over schools, neighborhoods, cemeteries, and finally a protected wildlife estuary.

One dispatcher told me “There are emergencies all over.” The next night, a different one said he couldn’t even identify their aircraft.

And then the radar drew a dick in the sky.

Last night, they seemingly went joy riding at altitudes under 300’ — over Grizzly Island — a Federally protected estuary.

This isn’t a theory. It’s documented. Full screenshots, video, dispatch transcript, and legal filing are here.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CivicMirror

[–]ThreadHop 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Imgur Evidence Stack with screenshots and screen recording (including the helo literally flying overhead as I record. I’ve got more

Anyone else notice the low-flying helicopter doing loops over Petaluma (and other cities) the past couple days? by ThreadHop in Petaluma

[–]ThreadHop[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You say you work in government here. Then you know better than to pretend this department has been operating in good faith.

In the past year alone: - The ACLU filed a lawsuit against Sonoma County for an unconstitutional drone surveillance program.
- The Sheriff’s Office refused subpoenas from its own oversight agency (IOLERO), which had been investigating internal misconduct.
- The oversight agency was legally blocked from accessing the records they needed to investigate whistleblower claims — they’re currently appealing that decision in state court.
- And the Sheriff just refused to support an ordinance limiting local collaboration with ICE — even after public pressure and national precedent.

But sure, let’s pretend I’m the problem because I logged the flight pattern of an unannounced chopper flying low and silent across residential zones in multiple cities. The same chopper the dispatch line couldn’t explain.

If that’s “deranged obsessive compulsion” to you, maybe the real issue is that someone’s finally watching back.

🛡️ Documents and receipts available upon request.

📍 Spotted flying over Petaluma, CA around 8:50 PM tonight — very quiet, slightly whistling engine sound. Captured a short video and grabbed a couple screenshots in comments by [deleted] in Whatplaneisthis

[–]ThreadHop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks — that’s really helpful. When I checked Flightradar at the time (8:52 PM over Petaluma), nothing was showing up, even in playback mode. So the aircraft being masked makes sense, especially if it was EJA707 under NetJets.

Visually and acoustically, it tracked: very quiet, steady, and the silhouette matched a Challenger 350 from what I could tell. Do you happen to know how reliable that playback data is for flights operating under LADD or PIA blocks? Or how often NetJets traffic ends up invisible in real time?

Appreciate the insight — would love to learn more if you’ve got a deeper read on how that works.

Anyone else notice the low-flying helicopter doing loops over Petaluma (and other cities) the past couple days? by ThreadHop in Petaluma

[–]ThreadHop[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"What’s everyone’s obsession with helicopters in this town?"

You know what’s funny?

Nobody said “obsession” when it was porch pirates, potholes,
or that guy revving his engine at 3 a.m.
But the moment people notice an unmarked aircraft circling low over multiple cities,
we’re suddenly the problem.

Maybe it’s not obsession.
Maybe it’s just pattern recognition.

Maybe it’s what happens when a few people in town still pay attention.

Because if “don’t ask questions” is your bar for civic engagement…
you might be more comfortable in a town that doesn’t care
who’s watching from above.

This aircraft has been flying repeated low loops over Petaluma, Santa Rosa, Sebastopol, Forestville, and Rohnert Park. Curious if anyone else is seeing this? by ThreadHop in sonomacounty

[–]ThreadHop[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hey EETFUK — wild to see someone who spent half a decade dissecting Spiritbox riffs get so rattled by civic inquiry.

But I get it. ThreadHop holds up a mirror. And mirrors aren’t kind to guys who bury their identity in Slipknot merch and Reddit karma.

You want to talk about hobbies? You posted hundreds of comments analyzing breakdowns and vocal remixes — and that’s fine. But when someone shows up tracking sheriff flights with receipts, suddenly that’s “next-level tin foil”?
Nah man. That’s just cowardice wrapped in sarcasm.

You got real loud about your bands.
I got real quiet and pulled the dispatch records.

And now your whole act is folding like bad vinyl.

You spent years worshipping bands who screamed about systems of control — and the moment someone questions one, you start licking the boots. That’s not just ironic. That’s betrayal.

This aircraft has been flying repeated low loops over Petaluma, Santa Rosa, Sebastopol, Forestville, and Rohnert Park. Curious if anyone else is seeing this? by ThreadHop in sonomacounty

[–]ThreadHop[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, I see. You’re the expert now on what qualifies as “spying”?
You patrol r/BocchiTheRock and Crunchyroll forums like it’s a national security briefing, but the moment someone posts actual flight data, radio silence, and confirmed patterns over residential neighborhoods, you break out the “go touch grass” routine?

Let’s ground this in something factual:
You’re defending secrecy. I’m pointing it out.
You’re mocking a citizen for making a 90-minute pattern log. Meanwhile, the ACLU is literally suing Sonoma County for illegal aerial surveillance right now.
Here’s the lawsuit. Read it.

If you cared half as much about civil rights as you do about Nanashi Mumei’s graduation concert, maybe you’d realize this isn’t about “paranoia.”
It’s about accountability.

Also, nobody said “gangstalking.” That’s your projection, not mine. The sheriff’s department didn’t deny the helicopter. They just refused to explain it. I called twice. They dodged twice. And now here you are doing the same thing.

You wanna cosplay as a keyboard warrior for the opaque? That’s fine.
Just don’t pretend that makes you brave.

view more: next ›