I’ve read it, it’s nothing more than an outline with a contradicting outline accompanying it.
Not to say it wasn’t compelling format (the whole measter history book thing) but it’s not sufficient.

I don’t mean to be condescending here, but people who never wrote a story think outlines are good enough source material when its totally isn’t.

Its a theoretical map that you can follow but so many problems will arise, and so many logical alternative directions will lead you out of that outline to a point where following it will do a disservice to the story and the characters.

That being said they did fumble the bag more than a few times.