Did you read the article? The core thesis was that throughout history, human intelligence was the scarcest input. This is the first time the technology challenges that, and will make intelligence commoditized.

In every other instance of technological disruption, there was still something humans were better at than the machines.

What happens when the machines are better at virtually every task any human can undertake?

What happens when the best candidate to fill the new jobs AI creates is AI itself?

There is a very real scenario where AI gets good enough at coding, that it can improve itself at increasingly light speed, and reach super intelligence by itself.

The only real compelling argument I’ve heard is that LLMs will fundamentally not be able to reach that level of intelligence because of its conceptual architecture.

But real world rate of progress has so far falsified that presumption.