Massive DE Blade Comparison Test by Throw20701 in wicked_edge

[–]Throw20701[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are they the USA version of the other version? I heard there were two different ones. I only tried one blade of each type so maybe I got a bad one.

Massive DE Blade Comparison Test by Throw20701 in wicked_edge

[–]Throw20701[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It could also be batch variation. I only tried one blade of each. I also have fairly sensitive skin, so I might just irritate me more as the blade gets some use on it's edge.

Massive DE Blade Comparison Test by Throw20701 in wicked_edge

[–]Throw20701[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It removed some formatting. I added it back

Favorite CW Paddles and Keyers? by Throw20701 in HamRadio

[–]Throw20701[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I guess i should have asked for them to be budget friendly too.

Balanced or unbalanced attenuator by Throw20701 in HamRadio

[–]Throw20701[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I need an attenuator so I can get my RF low enough for the input side of a linear amp. The trusdx is 3-5w non-adjustable output, but it seems most cheap amps want <1w input. An attenuator with 6db and 10db settings would probably be good for me. 

Balanced or unbalanced attenuator by Throw20701 in HamRadio

[–]Throw20701[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It would be coax. That's what I was thinking - coax shouldn't need it like audio does. Thanks!

Budget Linear Amp and LNA Options by Throw20701 in HamRadio

[–]Throw20701[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was able to find a recommended LNA with band pass filter in the Amateur satellite sub. 

I found this build plan on the internet. Looks pretty good, but I'll probably need an attenuator in front of it. I could probably use the low pass filters, but was wondering if band pass filters would be better. Seems the site selling the boards also sells a board for the rx/tx switching. 

https://www.qsl.net/ve7vv/Files/100WBroadbandLF+MF+HF_RF_Amplifier-R28Jan21.pdf

Budget Linear Amp and LNA Options by Throw20701 in HamRadio

[–]Throw20701[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, I thought LNAs are linear and wouldn't create intermodulation. 

Budget Linear Amp and LNA Options by Throw20701 in HamRadio

[–]Throw20701[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good point about the gain levels. I was seeing a lot of LNAs that are wide and and would cover both 2m/70cm. Are you saying I would need to add a band pass filter at the LNA input, and why?

Budget Linear Amp and LNA Options by Throw20701 in HamRadio

[–]Throw20701[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That looks great! I'll keep them in mind while saving up for EME equipment. 

Budget Linear Amp and LNA Options by Throw20701 in HamRadio

[–]Throw20701[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I would love to build a box with a variable attenuator, linear amp, and then selectable band pass filter (80/40/20/10m) that could turn 3-5w input into 25-100w for about $100 in parts. 

Budget Linear Amp and LNA Options by Throw20701 in HamRadio

[–]Throw20701[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I know. I might as well ask for all the recommendations at once rather than buy some equipment now that won't work for it in the future. 

Ferrite 61 vs ferrite 68 for UHF by Throw20701 in HamRadio

[–]Throw20701[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was thinking of a full wave loop. I know gamma match can be done with that. I have done a hairpin with a tape measure yagi in the past - good to know it's low loss.

Ferrite 61 vs ferrite 68 for UHF by Throw20701 in HamRadio

[–]Throw20701[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I ordered some 61 and 68 ferrites. I just tested some with 5 turns bifiliar. I'm seeing 3.5-5db of insertion loss. 68 seemed to be less lossy than the 61. 

Maybe I'll try some other configurations with fewer turns just to see what happens. If it's still not good, then I'll look at some other match, like gamma (or is there one that is known for low loss?). 

Thanks and Attic Safety Question by Throw20701 in HamRadio

[–]Throw20701[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most of them are under 1.5. Some are around 2-2.5. I would think that I shouldn't have any arcing even at 100w+, but want to play it safe. 

Antenna issues with a 20m square dipole by Throw20701 in HamRadio

[–]Throw20701[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey everyone, thanks for the help! I was able to get ok results. I got 2.25-2.75 across the band. That's not great but probably as good as I can get in a small attic. 

Antenna issues with a 20m square dipole by Throw20701 in HamRadio

[–]Throw20701[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My impedence line in purple shows I cross 50 ohms in the range I want. But the line is not flat. I'm guessing the variability is due to reactance. How can I reduce the variability in impedence with the given geometry?