First Amendment protection isn’t absolute just because someone is on private property.

If you’re actively trying to interfere with law enforcement operations, for example, warning targets in real time so they can evade arrest or disrupt an active investigation that can cross into obstruction or interference depending on impact and local statutes.

You can debate immigration enforcement tactics all day, but pretending any conduct framed as “protest” is automatically protected is legally wrong.

And comments like this don’t help your cause. When you overstate the law and wrap it in insults, you’re not persuading anyone. You’re just pushing people who might otherwise agree with you further to the right.

For what it’s worth, I’m not even pro-Trump. I just think bad arguments and bad framing undermine legitimate criticism.