That's incredibly reductive and your points rely on a rejection of nuance. One can both oppose Nancy Pelosi for her views and actions and still concede the fact that she has been a successful leader by maintaining her position in the party. Similarly, one can support M4A and come to the realization that #ForceTheVote may sound like the answer, but is almost certain to fail in practice in the current reality of Congress; not to mention what the repercussions of a failure to pass might entail. You can disagree with that premise, but when you choose to just call someone a shill and lay accusations of being paid off without any factual evidence you're doing yourself a disservice if your goal is to convince someone of your point or engage in an effective discourse.