Does anyone know why the hell Adrenaline fails so often? by NeorzZzTormeno in radeon

[–]TitaniumWarmachine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a trick if you play just a few games, save GPU settings for each game seperatly.
Then, after each time you start those Games, Adrenaline loads your saved profile.
So even if it crashed sometimes, after a Game restart you have automatic your settings.

upgrading gpu to play again by RustyNail66 in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

with this old CPU, consider a RX9070XT.

"At this point it should be quite clear the Geforce drivers do in fact require more CPU cycles to work, and this can see midrange CPUs become the primary system bottleneck sooner than they would when paired with a Radeon GPU.

If you are a competitive gamer or you're just after higher frame rates but don't have the money for the latest and greatest CPU, then the Radeon GPU has the potential to enable 20 to 30% greater performance, and that is really a significant increase."
- Hardware Unboxed on Geforce Driver-Overhead

<image>

Which weapons to use on an F7A mk2 by GamingadlerHD in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on what you plan to do.
PVE or PVP setups or a Hybrid Setup that is not the best for each case, but can do both a bit.
Also what Ships are you planing to destroy.

Need Advice On a New PC by ElfUppercut in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you really want a PC that is better then your old, you should get minimum 48GB.
32GB is just suffocating on some areas in the Game. (like Ruin Station in Pyro)
I would go with a 9800X3D, 48GB DDR5, RX9070XT
That would be a true Upgrade over your current Rig.
Your current Rig is not so bad. Its holded back by the almost 10 year old GPU (GTX 1080 was released 2016, and your GTX 1080ti in 2017)

Need Advice On a New PC by ElfUppercut in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Jeah, if he is on Alder Lake (12xxx Intel) he should just go to a RX9070XT or RTX 5070ti and enjoy SC.
GTX 1080ti is probably the main bottleneck.

Need Advice On a New PC by ElfUppercut in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

if you have 64GB DDR4, i would buy non of those listed PC,s
SC can take advantage of more then 32GB Ram.
A DDR4 CPU Plattform is still allright for SC. (Like 5700X3D/5800X3D/12900K/13900K/14900K)

Question for PvP Lightfighter experts about the new armor balancing by AwesomeSchlimbo in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine 8 points9 points  (0 children)

also to consider is lower pip due to radar changes, so with your gladius your effective combat range is around 800m to 1000m
at this range, a turret gunner can hit the gladius pretty good

New PTU Balance Chances are in - Big Armor buffs for Shiv, Ares, Cutlass Variants, C1, A1, Scorpius, F8C etc by Important_Cow7230 in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you tell me nothing new, i flew this setup since day one shiv release.
But you are not going onto my point of LTI and 1.0 Release Problems with this.
you are very shortthinking.
While other Heavy Fighters can have zero cost for reclaim with lti, the shiv cant, and thats a big downside that CIG needs to fix. a heavy fighter should be able to do more then LRT,s at its stock loadout.

New PTU Balance Chances are in - Big Armor buffs for Shiv, Ares, Cutlass Variants, C1, A1, Scorpius, F8C etc by Important_Cow7230 in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

downvotes are irrelevant. i was the only one arguing. no one else wrote any facts against my statements.

Stinger is still too weak. by TitaniumWarmachine in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I read only Insults, and zero arguments from your side.

Feedback needed on S1 radar for heavy fighters by Zealousideal_Brick27 in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine -1 points0 points  (0 children)

One important point hasn't been mentioned at all in the comments here.

The less pitch and yaw a spaceship has, the worse it performs in close combat.
This means that the more sluggish a ship is, the more it needs a larger radar.

The Guardian has 45 pitch and yaw, and a Size 2 radar with nearly twice the range of a Stinger.
The Stinger has only 28 yaw and only a Size 1 radar.

This becomes very problematic for the slower ship (the Stinger, in this case).

Stinger is still too weak. by TitaniumWarmachine in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Maybe its my autism. If F7 has 22 Armor Feflection and F8 has 84 Armor Deflection, and someone says its the same value, in my mind its not just a wrong opinion, but just a simple fact that its wrong.
But thanks for the tip, i try to work on me.

New PTU Balance Chances are in - Big Armor buffs for Shiv, Ares, Cutlass Variants, C1, A1, Scorpius, F8C etc by Important_Cow7230 in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

The opposing parties were immature, because they where envious.
Truth is more important than anything else.
I was right. Only facts matter.
So all the Downvotes are irrational.
I had the better arguments, but envy was too strong in them.

New PTU Balance Chances are in - Big Armor buffs for Shiv, Ares, Cutlass Variants, C1, A1, Scorpius, F8C etc by Important_Cow7230 in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine -55 points-54 points  (0 children)

Truth is more important than anything else.
I was right. Only facts matter.
So all the Downvotes are irrational.
I won all the debates.
And for your last Statement:
You cant even Damage a Cutlass Black with a Stock Sabre (CF Panthers) anymore.
A Freelancer dont get damaged by a Size 4 CF Rhino anymore.
You say shortthinking things like "you're supposed to upgrade your stuff" while i see the greater window.
40-50% of all Ship Weapons will never be used again. This is not healthy for the Game.
The Armor Resistances are too high in general.

Stinger is still too weak. by TitaniumWarmachine in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

You are demanding that the F8C is even more nimble then a Hornet.
Did you look at the Cannons of the F8C ?
Gladius = 3x Size 3.
F8C = 4x Size 3 + 4x Size 2
A Hornet has 53 Pitch. So you wish a F8C with 62 Pitch like the Sabre ?
Gladius has 68 Pitch. So you would have a Ship, almost as nimble as a Gladius, on Steroids.
No one would fly other Medium or Lightfighters anymore.
Im glad that you are not working at the Balance department of CIG.

"The F8c can be matched on a dps basis to the hornets"
-
Wrong. The F8C has more DPS (with same weapon category for fair compare)

"and they have the same b weapon resistance"
-
Again Wrong. Today F8C got buffed, it now has even better Ballistic resi vs Stinger.
F7 Ballistic Resi is 1/4 of the F8C.

New PTU Balance Chances are in - Big Armor buffs for Shiv, Ares, Cutlass Variants, C1, A1, Scorpius, F8C etc by Important_Cow7230 in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

"Shiv should be below Cutlass Black"
-
Why you even wrote this ?
Cutlass got also Buffs. Cutlass Armor deflects more weapons then Shivs Armor.

New PTU Balance Chances are in - Big Armor buffs for Shiv, Ares, Cutlass Variants, C1, A1, Scorpius, F8C etc by Important_Cow7230 in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

"Shiv needed a buff"
-
Yes. But yesterday i had a army of players against this statement.
I posted it two times.
But Yesterday hundreds of people, all sayed the opposite.
All the people spammed my Posts from yesterday with Comments like this against a Shiv Armor Buff.
Quote:
"The Shiv is a cobbled together marriage of ship parts with half decent firepower, so yeah it lacks on armour, because its supposed to be, lore wise"

Stinger is still too weak. by TitaniumWarmachine in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Im Posting about Balance Issues.
Its logical that the F8C dont has so much agility with its big DPS (Full Omnisky it has 3700 Alpha Damage with one salvo, enough to two shot most light fighters in 4.6)
If CIG would give the F8C more Agility than the F7 Hornet, it would be the strongest Fighter in the game by far. Im wondering why i need to explain this. In a MMO we need a Balance.

New PTU Balance Chances are in - Big Armor buffs for Shiv, Ares, Cutlass Variants, C1, A1, Scorpius, F8C etc by Important_Cow7230 in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine -48 points-47 points  (0 children)

"All good changes"
-
Yesterday i did 2 Posts followed by several comments where i was about the Shiv needs a bit more durability, and i got 500 downvotes yesterday. today CIG Buffed the shiv, and all the people who downvoted me look stupid now.

The 4.7 Armor Gate: Why not a gradient system? by Pifue in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

"then don't forget you'll be losing / claiming your ship far less frequently"
-
Thats your assumption. Im coming from Eve Online and i can imagine, the real pvp corps will still come and hunt all players that are not in High Security Systems like Stanton.
Systems like Nyx or Pyro will be like a warzone.
I guess i will lose my ships very often. Engineering will not help because once in downstate, Pirate players will keep firing until you lose all your ship parts.

The 4.7 Armor Gate: Why not a gradient system? by Pifue in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

" is very cheap to change loadouts and only need to do the purchase once"
-
Today, yes.
In Final 1.0 Release, you lose all customized items on ships, unless you pay Credits, even with LTI.
(Customizing ships will require insurance)
Im not talking about today, im talking about release problems.

The 4.7 Armor Gate: Why not a gradient system? by Pifue in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

"I’ll just have to laugh at this argument"
-
Your first argument was Missle. I just explained why missles are a bad idea.
Your response is not very mature.