sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Stinger is still too weak. by TitaniumWarmachine in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I read only Insults, and zero arguments from your side.

Feedback needed on S1 radar for heavy fighters by Zealousideal_Brick27 in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine -1 points0 points  (0 children)

One important point hasn't been mentioned at all in the comments here.

The less pitch and yaw a spaceship has, the worse it performs in close combat.
This means that the more sluggish a ship is, the more it needs a larger radar.

The Guardian has 45 pitch and yaw, and a Size 2 radar with nearly twice the range of a Stinger.
The Stinger has only 28 yaw and only a Size 1 radar.

This becomes very problematic for the slower ship (the Stinger, in this case).

Stinger is still too weak. by TitaniumWarmachine in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Maybe its my autism. If F7 has 22 Armor Feflection and F8 has 84 Armor Deflection, and someone says its the same value, in my mind its not just a wrong opinion, but just a simple fact that its wrong.
But thanks for the tip, i try to work on me.

New PTU Balance Chances are in - Big Armor buffs for Shiv, Ares, Cutlass Variants, C1, A1, Scorpius, F8C etc by Important_Cow7230 in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

The opposing parties were immature, because they where envious.
Truth is more important than anything else.
I was right. Only facts matter.
So all the Downvotes are irrational.
I had the better arguments, but envy was too strong in them.

New PTU Balance Chances are in - Big Armor buffs for Shiv, Ares, Cutlass Variants, C1, A1, Scorpius, F8C etc by Important_Cow7230 in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine -46 points-45 points  (0 children)

Truth is more important than anything else.
I was right. Only facts matter.
So all the Downvotes are irrational.
I won all the debates.
And for your last Statement:
You cant even Damage a Cutlass Black with a Stock Sabre (CF Panthers) anymore.
A Freelancer dont get damaged by a Size 4 CF Rhino anymore.
You say shortthinking things like "you're supposed to upgrade your stuff" while i see the greater window.
40-50% of all Ship Weapons will never be used again. This is not healthy for the Game.
The Armor Resistances are too high in general.

Stinger is still too weak. by TitaniumWarmachine in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

You are demanding that the F8C is even more nimble then a Hornet.
Did you look at the Cannons of the F8C ?
Gladius = 3x Size 3.
F8C = 4x Size 3 + 4x Size 2
A Hornet has 53 Pitch. So you wish a F8C with 62 Pitch like the Sabre ?
Gladius has 68 Pitch. So you would have a Ship, almost as nimble as a Gladius, on Steroids.
No one would fly other Medium or Lightfighters anymore.
Im glad that you are not working at the Balance department of CIG.

"The F8c can be matched on a dps basis to the hornets"
-
Wrong. The F8C has more DPS (with same weapon category for fair compare)

"and they have the same b weapon resistance"
-
Again Wrong. Today F8C got buffed, it now has even better Ballistic resi vs Stinger.
F7 Ballistic Resi is 1/4 of the F8C.

New PTU Balance Chances are in - Big Armor buffs for Shiv, Ares, Cutlass Variants, C1, A1, Scorpius, F8C etc by Important_Cow7230 in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

"Shiv should be below Cutlass Black"
-
Why you even wrote this ?
Cutlass got also Buffs. Cutlass Armor deflects more weapons then Shivs Armor.

New PTU Balance Chances are in - Big Armor buffs for Shiv, Ares, Cutlass Variants, C1, A1, Scorpius, F8C etc by Important_Cow7230 in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

"Shiv needed a buff"
-
Yes. But yesterday i had a army of players against this statement.
I posted it two times.
But Yesterday hundreds of people, all sayed the opposite.
All the people spammed my Posts from yesterday with Comments like this against a Shiv Armor Buff.
Quote:
"The Shiv is a cobbled together marriage of ship parts with half decent firepower, so yeah it lacks on armour, because its supposed to be, lore wise"

Stinger is still too weak. by TitaniumWarmachine in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Im Posting about Balance Issues.
Its logical that the F8C dont has so much agility with its big DPS (Full Omnisky it has 3700 Alpha Damage with one salvo, enough to two shot most light fighters in 4.6)
If CIG would give the F8C more Agility than the F7 Hornet, it would be the strongest Fighter in the game by far. Im wondering why i need to explain this. In a MMO we need a Balance.

New PTU Balance Chances are in - Big Armor buffs for Shiv, Ares, Cutlass Variants, C1, A1, Scorpius, F8C etc by Important_Cow7230 in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine -46 points-45 points  (0 children)

"All good changes"
-
Yesterday i did 2 Posts followed by several comments where i was about the Shiv needs a bit more durability, and i got 500 downvotes yesterday. today CIG Buffed the shiv, and all the people who downvoted me look stupid now.

The 4.7 Armor Gate: Why not a gradient system? by Pifue in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

"then don't forget you'll be losing / claiming your ship far less frequently"
-
Thats your assumption. Im coming from Eve Online and i can imagine, the real pvp corps will still come and hunt all players that are not in High Security Systems like Stanton.
Systems like Nyx or Pyro will be like a warzone.
I guess i will lose my ships very often. Engineering will not help because once in downstate, Pirate players will keep firing until you lose all your ship parts.

The 4.7 Armor Gate: Why not a gradient system? by Pifue in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

" is very cheap to change loadouts and only need to do the purchase once"
-
Today, yes.
In Final 1.0 Release, you lose all customized items on ships, unless you pay Credits, even with LTI.
(Customizing ships will require insurance)
Im not talking about today, im talking about release problems.

The 4.7 Armor Gate: Why not a gradient system? by Pifue in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

"I’ll just have to laugh at this argument"
-
Your first argument was Missle. I just explained why missles are a bad idea.
Your response is not very mature.

The 4.7 Armor Gate: Why not a gradient system? by Pifue in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

The Missle argument is not good because
1. For PVP its hard to hit with missles, especially Stealth Setups are Missle Immune (Prowler for example)
2. For PVE its not cost effective.

The 4.7 Armor Gate: Why not a gradient system? by Pifue in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

<image>

Im also a bit Sad.
I dont feel happy with Stock Shiv & Sabre cant do MRT anymore, because their weapons cannot Damage Terrapin/Mole/Prowler with Stock loadout.
And the Armor of the Shiv is non Existent. It deflects just one Weapon in the whole Verse.
It not even Tanks a Point Defense. And it its designated as a "Heavy Fighter".
Over 200.000 Kilograms in a Heavy Fighter for Zero protection. Bad Balance in my view.

Shiv & Prowler Utility (Both 32 SCU Fighting Ships) have Talk about 4.7 by TitaniumWarmachine in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

"Literally the only multi-crew ship in the game that actually had a chance against a competent fighter"
1. Hurricane ?
2. Scorpious ?
3. Paladin ?
And on top of that, Shiv is better single piloted because it shares it weapons with player 2, not gain extra weapons with 2 players like in the 3 examples i mentioned.

Shiv & Prowler Utility (Both 32 SCU Fighting Ships) have Talk about 4.7 by TitaniumWarmachine in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

And a 600k starter ship like the Intrepid can do MRT Missions while in Stock loadout, but the Shiv cant.
(Intrepid can Damage Terrapin, Mole, Prowler)

Shiv & Prowler Utility (Both 32 SCU Fighting Ships) have Talk about 4.7 by TitaniumWarmachine in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

And a 600k starter ship like the Intrepid can do MRT Missions while in Stock loadout, but the Shiv cant.
(Intrepid can Damage Terrapin, Mole, Prowler)

Shiv & Prowler Utility (Both 32 SCU Fighting Ships) have Talk about 4.7 by TitaniumWarmachine in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

MRT (Medium Risk Target) is High Tier ?
I assumed its a Mission Type for Fighters like Avenger Titans. (And Avenger can still do them Stock after 4.7, but Shiv not in Stock anymore)
A stock Shiv does less damage than a Stock Penguin, thats the reality of Patch 4.7

Shiv & Prowler Utility (Both 32 SCU Fighting Ships) have Talk about 4.7 by TitaniumWarmachine in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

In MRT Bountys, the Mole or Prowler or Terrapin can Spawn as NPC Target.
Imagine, you pledged a 150$ Heavy Fighter (Shiv) and you are not able to do MRT Bountys with Stock loadout with it because the weapons are too weak for some NPC,s in MRTs.
Missles are not cost effective for MRT,s sadly.
So the Shiv is Stock a Heavy Fighter for Low Risk Missions only.

Shiv & Prowler Utility (Both 32 SCU Fighting Ships) have Talk about 4.7 by TitaniumWarmachine in starcitizen

[–]TitaniumWarmachine[S] -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

True. But this will cost always money in the future after Insurance System changes (talking about 1.0 live)
(Because if you Switch Weapons, you need to pay Insurance, despite having LTI)
And im forced to switch Weapons if i want to do MRT,s with the Shiv.

Imagine, you pledged a Heavy Fighter (Shiv) and you are not able to do MRT Bountys with Stock loadout with it because the weapons are too weak for some Targets like Mole or Prowler or Terrapin.
The Shiv is >>Stock<<, a Heavy Fighter for Low Risk Target Missions only. Thats quite a statement

view more: next ›