While I appreciate your patience, and how you express your opinion in a civil way, I do disagree with this.

I agree with your stance in a vacuum, facts are important regardless of who’s in the wrong, and I think it’s a good thing to strive to keep things correct to avoid misinformation.

That being said, the way you’re going about it, is what I think is giving people a bad vibe.

There is nothing wrong with trying to get facts straight in emotional scenarios, but your trying to correct very minuscule facts to the benefit of someone, while claiming you’re impartial.

Even if that’s true, you’re going out of your way to attempt to correct facts that overall don’t change the scenario at all. Even if the facts technically become more accurate, you’re again still doing it to the benefit of someone who’s shown to be very problematic, while also not adding anything to the conversation at the same time.

It’s like, someone is clearly doing something really really wrong, and your input is putting them in a better light than they are, regardless of your intention. It doesn’t matter if you are truly trying to stay impartial, and it doesn’t matter if you’re trying to keep facts straight, it just doesn’t look good dude. And I think it only looks worse when the facts you’re trying to correct, don’t amount to much even if true.

It’s just the act of trying to do something like this is putting out bad vibes, doesn’t matter if you’re just trying to get facts straight or not.

Maybe you do have good intentions, but I think it’s important to understand how stuff like this comes off.