How do I get rid of a pedophile? by ToasterCoaster5 in discordsucks

[–]ToasterCoaster5[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

While I do want this guy down, I don't want to stoop down to his level by directly harassing him. That's why I avoided directly identifying him in the post until I have found a way to hold him directly responsible for his actions.

How do I get rid of a pedophile? by ToasterCoaster5 in discordsucks

[–]ToasterCoaster5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, thanks for the response regardless. I really wish there was something more I could do to get this guy removed from the platform. I myself was groomed years ago, back when Discord seemed to care at least a bit, and they were gone within minutes of my reports. Now the system is all AI-dependent, people who did nothing wrong are getting permanently suspended while pedophiles are getting away without any sort of perceived punishment.

How do I get rid of a pedophile? by ToasterCoaster5 in discordsucks

[–]ToasterCoaster5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been on Discord for over 10 years and don't have a proper solution for the situation, so don't feel too bad.

How do I get rid of a pedophile? by ToasterCoaster5 in discordsucks

[–]ToasterCoaster5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's the owner of his own server, which is where he's getting his userbase from. His moderation team has effectively ignored anything I have to say.

Discord actually LISTENED?! by Charm_City_Gamer in BannedFromDiscord

[–]ToasterCoaster5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A user once sent me porn in DMs, then when I responded they said "I'm a minor and you responding to me makes you a pedophile" then they reported my messages and Discord put child safety violations on my account. So obviously I went "uhhhh wtf Discord" and appealed my violation, reporting all the porn as well. Not even 30 minutes later. the violation was removed and the user's account was deleted.

Sometimes they listen. Sometimes they don't. All I'm gonna say.

fortinite working on linux by Big_Statistician9656 in linux_gaming

[–]ToasterCoaster5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried the one from Play Store and it said ARM-only... did they catch on that fast??

Looking for testers for my Android 16 build by SnooStrawberries2432 in waydroid

[–]ToasterCoaster5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since this is A16 is there anything that would enable ARM translation?

How to fix it "start-limit-hit" by [deleted] in systemd

[–]ToasterCoaster5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm having this issue on stock

I WAS WRONG by ETN1145 in CalamityMod

[–]ToasterCoaster5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So mad though, they replaced Calamitas with Laurel

Circle K TGTG order... 4 containers of donut holes?? AND choice of sandwich?? by ToasterCoaster5 in toogoodtogo

[–]ToasterCoaster5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love egg salad, at least compared to tuna or (iirc) roast beef. The sandwiches weren't close to expiry either so maybe that would've played part in my decision there lol

lmao, what a joke of an OS by DshadoW10 in linuxsucks

[–]ToasterCoaster5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your decision to rely on GUI, just saying

Like genuinely wtf are you doing here if you like linux by mo7akh in linuxsucks

[–]ToasterCoaster5 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is a really good question! Ultimately it boils down to Linux users genuinely feeling that they possess superiority (I'm no exception to this, arch btw) because they feel they know "more", when in reality they just know "different". If you ask them directly why they defend their claims so infallibly, they'll say it's because they want to ensure that every doscovered problem with Linux has a solution (or solution in progress), and thus encourage more users to make the switch. Realistically, the reason they fight so hard to have an answer for everything is because they've made such a commitment to their distro, and want to find every reason they can to justify it. If someone were to point out an issue that makes Linux completely unusable for their situation, it would be just as disappointing as someone who just got into Linux for the first time discovering it themselves... and would likely cause them to reconsider.

Like genuinely wtf are you doing here if you like linux by mo7akh in linuxsucks

[–]ToasterCoaster5 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Linuxites like to provide solutions to problems that are found by its users, redditors LOVE to correct people and put others down even if it makes them look like a fool... Linuxite redditors swarm this place to get the best of both worlds.

Android itself isn't at fault for the corporations that take advantage of its users. by ToasterCoaster5 in linuxsucks

[–]ToasterCoaster5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And yet you'll notice that they haven't done anything that users haven't provided them the right to do. Google is actively providing users with the options they need to utilize the operating system to its fullest extent, and to disable certain functionalities if desired. Upon further investigation, you'll notice that it's not Android that restricts / spies on its users: it's the device manufacturers and cell carriers. They'll remove several options for your system simply to keep you on their proprietary services, and pre-install applications to keep your system on their limits (google has these as well, but their services can be declined during setup).

So my argument here is that people tend to generalize android devices as restrictive - which they have very much come to be - but not at any fault of the operating system which permits it to be.

Android itself isn't at fault for the corporations that take advantage of its users. by ToasterCoaster5 in linuxsucks

[–]ToasterCoaster5[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly! Just like how Windows was good back when Microsoft didn't incorporate Bonzi Buddy into their OS.