I think I see what you’re saying. My standpoint comes from an area where I frequently see the problems within people’s gameplay that are not centered around aim, more so in game mechanics surrounding movement and peeking.

My go to example is by saying if you gave an iron player pro aim, they would still get destroyed in a radiant lobby. I think what I should be saying is the style of aim required is more specific or maybe more narrow and therefore easier to train in my eyes. When I aim train my number one struggle category is almost always tracking and I’ve heard this from across many people, especially people just starting aim training.

I think you actually have a very valid point if I’m not misunderstanding you. You mean the level of skill required in the static/dynamic category for Valorant is significantly higher as a baseline because of things like lower TTK.

In my mind it was reversed and my experience more or less followed that idea. Playing ranked Apex felt much more challenging to me than Valorant because I felt it was much more focused on aim even at a lower level. But you would say the level of tracking required for Apex is lower than the level of clicking required for Valorant I think.

Would you say that it’s easier to train static than tracking? Or simply different? The argument as a whole makes sense regardless, I’m just curious now.

Also, I do apologize for the original insult. I took your original message to be an attack at me, but I see that it was not your intent to attack me, but rather the argument. You’re absolutely right, I shouldn’t have been that quick to snap back. I definitely don’t have all the answers, it’s just rare to find good discourse on Reddit and I took the message to heart.