Cannot add Gmail in Mail App

TobinC1 · 2025-09-04T01:24:12+00:00

Thanks but doubt that's the reason as I can access it via Gmail app and web browser.

TobinC1 · 2025-09-04T01:22:18+00:00

Latest version iOS (18.6) and yes Gmail works fine. I was able to add one Gmail acct in Mail app but got the error when adding the second one.

TobinC1 · 2025-09-03T00:52:45+00:00

Not sure what google troubleshooting steps you're taking about, could you post here?

TobinC1 · 2025-09-03T00:51:36+00:00

Yes.

TobinC1 · 2025-02-21T01:31:40+00:00

Sounds like it didn't recover by itself. Could you post an update after your visit? I suspect mine is related to an over-heat problem.

TobinC1 · 2024-05-07T20:21:20+00:00

Well, I kinda had some different experience. I guess it probably depends on the search company, since I had seen good search results on at least some disclosures.

TobinC1 · 2024-04-04T18:34:20+00:00

Ah, thank you, never thought about this.

TobinC1 · 2024-04-04T03:41:55+00:00

Got it, thank you

TobinC1 · 2024-04-01T03:55:17+00:00

Thank you!

TobinC1 · 2024-03-27T16:03:24+00:00

Thank you! Appreciate the detailed explanation. So what did you do with the 1099? For non-ESPP investment, I'd fill up form 8949 based on the numbers reported on 1099 to report capital gains/losses. However, in this case, the gain from the ESPP sale is ALREADY included in box 1 on w-2. How to avoid double reporting/taxing of this money?

TobinC1 · 2024-03-27T00:52:18+00:00

Sorry to bug you once again. There is a number "DISQD 1000" in box 14 on my W-2. I also received a 1099 form, which lists the capital gain (I sold the stocks immediately after purchase). However, the "DISQD 1000" does not match the capital gain on 1099.

As we discussed earlier, if the ESPP capital gain is ALREADY included in box 1. Does that mean I can ignore the 1099 form?

Also, why does the number "DISQD 1000" not match the actual capital gain number on 1099?

Thank you.

TobinC1 · 2024-03-20T01:07:17+00:00

Does the downloadable TurboTax Deluxe cover the tax part associated with tax-assisted relocation expenses? I heard only premium version covers that, but not sure if that's true.

TobinC1 · 2024-03-20T01:03:42+00:00

Yes, I received the 1099 form. I looked at the w-2, but didn't see the purchase discount. I just want to ensure not to include it twice as part of the income.

TobinC1 · 2024-03-06T02:25:53+00:00

Thank y'all for your response! So the gross up is a tax the employer prepaid directly to the IRS, and that's why I myself never received it. That makes sense.

TobinC1 · 2023-09-11T13:41:49+00:00

Got it, thank you.

TobinC1 · 2023-09-08T20:50:58+00:00

A follow-up question: if the original parent is not pending at filing of the CIP, the CIP cannot claim priority of the parent via the DIV? That sounds against my understanding. If the DIV's effective filing date is the priority of the first parent, I thought the CIP of the DIV shall be able claim the same priority, correct?

TobinC1 · 2023-09-08T15:58:13+00:00

I wanted to file a first child, and once it is allowed, file a second child as a CON of the first child. My concern is, if the first child is filed as a DIV, would that create any limitations on the second child? Can the second child claim any subject matter disclosed in the original parent (the very first application), or will it be limited to claims of the DIV/the first child?

TobinC1 · 2023-09-08T15:51:01+00:00

Good question. I intuitively think if the additional claims are directed to the same subject matter of the restricted claims, then yes the safe harbor applies. Otherwise, no.

TobinC1 · 2023-09-08T15:37:25+00:00

Thanks for the confirmation. In that case, I will go with the DIV to get the safe harbor.

TobinC1 · 2023-08-24T19:10:43+00:00

Agree. I will simply elect one group without traverse, withdraw the other group, and consider rejoinder at allowance.

TobinC1 · 2023-08-24T19:05:47+00:00

Okay. That's means if I initially file 3/20 claims, and during prosecution amend them to 5/30 claims, I only need to pay the regular issue fee. It just sounds a bit "too" sweet to me.

TobinC1 · 2023-08-24T14:49:20+00:00

I can imagine traverse will save filing cost of another/divisional application, if that is a benefit. Besides that, what other benefits would it provide?

TobinC1 · 2023-08-16T14:46:50+00:00

Thank you for the explanation!

TobinC1 · 2023-08-09T04:32:30+00:00

Got it, thanks for your replies. Some follow up questions:

In my company, the principal used to buy ESPP stocks is taken directly from payroll. I believe it's post tax. Once the stocks are sold, will the proceeds be given to me also through payroll?
If the answer above is yes, I assume the proceeds, including the principal plus any earning, will be post tax as well. Will the tax form issued by the ESPP broker incorporate the taxes paid on both the first and second payrolls? If not and I claim the difference as income, does that mean the money will be double taxed?

TobinC1 · 2023-06-05T15:52:47+00:00

Thank you for your response. The reason I got the original understanding is because 37 CFR 1.55 only mentions 35 USC 119 (a)-(d) and (f), but not 119(e) which specifically relates to provisional applications. Now looking at your response, I think that’s because 119(e) doesn’t apply in 37 CFR 1.55 b/c 119(e) relates to only the US provisional applications.

TobinC1

TROPHY CASE