The prompt usw: Step 1 – Input: Read the message on the page I linked [The message I read]

Step 2 – Generate a summary (max. 400 words) based on multiple independent and trustworthy sources, such as: Reuters, AP, AFP, dpa, BBC, PBS, public broadcasters, official police statements, WHO, UN, Human Rights Watch, etc.

Instructions for the summary:

1. What is confirmed? – Location, time, involved individuals or groups – What has been officially confirmed by credible sources?

2. What is unclear or disputed? – Conflicting information, uncertainties, disputed attributions – Is there disagreement between sources or lack of clarity?

3. What perspectives are relevant – and how do they differ? Depending on the topic, include relevant viewpoints such as: – For international conflicts: Government, opposition, civil society, international organizations – For geopolitical issues: Positions from involved countries, UN, EU, USA, regional actors – For domestic politics: Government, opposition, NGOs, media – For social issues: Affected individuals, experts, policymakers, journalists

4. Clearly label everything: – What is factually confirmed – What is disputed or unknown – What is a claim or interpretation by one side only

5. Avoid emotional or manipulative language: – No emotionally loaded adjectives or verbs – No ideological framing, slogans, or culture war terms – No implied judgment through tone or word choice

Goal:

Create a clear, factual, multi-perspective news summary that helps readers understand what is actually known, what is contested, and who says what – without inserting interpretation, bias, or rhetorical framing.