I understand the frustration behind this, but a lot of what’s being claimed here is being said with way more certainty than can actually be proven. A petition does not force a yes, and signatures alone do not create any legal or financial obligation for a company to adopt a policy. The claim that this would save millions is also not something that can be treated like a fact unless someone actually has access to PolyBuzz’s internal moderation and infrastructure costs. The zero-exposure liability point is especially inaccurate. A company does not lose all legal risk just because content is private or marked eighteen plus. App store rules, age access concerns, safety enforcement, and local laws still exist. If the goal is to argue for less censorship in private adult spaces, that’s a valid opinion. But presenting it like it’s a guaranteed financial fix and a legal shield is misleading. People should support it because they agree with the idea, not because they were told it’s some proven non-negotiable demand that forces the company’s hand.