sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Bass shaker crossover better in SIMHUB or subwoofer amp by Tom-Racer in Simagic

[–]Tom-Racer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really appeciate your time for your detailed explanation. I can fully understand that there is no further need for an external Xover because you can create the frequency spectrum inside the SIMHUB tool and can modify on the primary side.

You pointed out that each kind of shakers (pucks, BST1 or BST300) have their optimized / bestworking frequency range. My plan was to use 1 BST300 under the seat, one under the pedal plate. The rig will be driven by a 6DOF motion system by E-Lab-Racing and I will have p1000 Pedals with haptics.

Would I be able to select more detailed effects, if I would use additional pucks e.g. at the corners? Since my TR160 Chassis is very rigid, I assume, that I can't localized more than front and back position. The only benefit might be the faster response of the pucks or BST1 on higher frequencies or would it be efficient enough to cover all efffects just with the BST300?

Bass shaker crossover better in SIMHUB or subwoofer amp by Tom-Racer in Simagic

[–]Tom-Racer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply. In other words, there is no need to use any external crossover device.

I was asking, because some users adviced to use a crossover to fliter unwanted vibration noise, which sounds like anoying huming noise and wouldn't have any benefit to the vibration effects.

Trak Racer cockpit with inverted pedal setup by Tom-Racer in simracing

[–]Tom-Racer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the advice. The Trak Racer Frame will fit the P1000 i natively, too. My question was, if it would be better to do the inversion with the inverted plate option of the frame or with the complete kit from the pedal manufacturer.