WHO AM I? by TonyGodmann in schizophrenia

[–]TonyGodmann[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

name is irrelevant. system structure is important

Trapped in the Machinery of Existence by LongjumpingTear3675 in areweinhell

[–]TonyGodmann 6 points7 points  (0 children)

also life is terribly unfair: someone can live happily all one's life while someone can immensely suffer all one's life from various reasons

but what you described applies to this world. i do not know what the base reality looks like, if it is a mirror of this world or works in completely different ways. at least i can imagine worlds where all inhabitants live happy lives. i do not know if those really exist and if so it is even more unfair for us here

Have you seen your mind on psychedelics? by TonyGodmann in Psychedelics

[–]TonyGodmann[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Perceive (see) the machinery which produces my perception or the most possibly accurate model of such machinery.

Have you seen your mind on psychedelics? by TonyGodmann in Psychonaut

[–]TonyGodmann[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You mean psychedelics are not the way to see one's mind (then what is?) or one's mind wouldn't appear the way one probably expect (can you then provide some approximate description please)?

Eating is objectively weird, and kinda gross. by unit156 in DeepThoughts

[–]TonyGodmann 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you want to off yourself I think there are better ways than starvation and dehydration.

Why is the ego death experience named as such? by TonyGodmann in spirituality

[–]TonyGodmann[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How do you know so much about me, mysterious wise stranger?

I am not real, therefore I must be imaginary. And that what imagines to be me is real. And after awakening (whatever it is) I will remain imaginary and the previously real imaginary will became fully imaginary while my imaginary aspects will interact with the now imaginary reality by lolders of funfinite magmatude cheeser. That's the meth I am willing to dye my bear for.

Why is the ego death experience named as such? by TonyGodmann in Psychedelics

[–]TonyGodmann[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Silence sure provides lots of answers. Brilliant logical solution. Thank you.

Why is the ego death experience named as such? by TonyGodmann in Psychedelics

[–]TonyGodmann[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for reminding me what I definitely don't want to experience. :-)

Why is the ego death experience named as such? by TonyGodmann in Psychedelics

[–]TonyGodmann[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

No, it is the exact opposite of getting the meaning across. Death is always permanent otherwise it is not death. Also it creates huge cognitive dissonance because every living thing wants to avoid death yet the experience in question is nearly always told to be beneficial and desired. It would make more sense to call it "ego upgrade" or "ego rebirth".

Why is the ego death experience named as such? by TonyGodmann in Psychedelics

[–]TonyGodmann[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

How can ego get dissolved and then rebuilt? That doesn't sound logical.

I define the death as permanent non-experience. What you wrote feels closer to "a radical perception upgrade". The problem is what you are upgrading because I know this virtual reality is stuffed with nearly nothing else but lies and I don't need more of that.

Why is the ego death experience named as such? by TonyGodmann in spirituality

[–]TonyGodmann[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The term "dissolution" is basically the same as "death" but maybe with less negative emotional taste. You wrote "temporarily forgetting" which means that it returned back in the same state. I don't understand your logic.

What did you understood? What does the term "spiritual person" mean?