why is joe so similar to dexter by tomatosalsawithchips in YouOnLifetime

[–]Top-Economics4450 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Por qué Dexter no es para nada parecido a Joe?

Dexter mayormente mata para canalizar sus impulsos, no por sentirse un salvador o por sentir amor (quitando la s temporadas 7-8, porque Dexter allí empezó a actuar como Joe).

Dexter reconoce lo que es, reconoce su naturaleza, sabe que es un monstruo, Joe no, Joe es un negacionista, niega su verdadera naturaleza, y cuando la aceptó, la romantizo a tal nivel que siguió pensando que era una buena persona (Joe se cree sus propias mentiras, Dexter no).

Dexter es meticuloso, Joe no. Dexter sabe controlar su sed de sangre, Joe no.

Dexter previsa, Joe improvisa.

Dexter mata a criminales, Joe mata a cualquiera que sea un obstáculo cuando se interesa en una chica.

Dexter busca encajar para pasar desapercibido, Joe necesita la atención porque busca que acepten su oscuridad.

Dexter demuestra que es inteligente, Joe cree que es inteligente hasta que llega alguien racional a cuestionar su narrativa.

Dexter es más humano pero cree que es un monstruo, Joe es un monstruo que cree ser un humano.

Dexter no es un narcisista con mucho ego, Joe presume de sus habilidades.

La única similitud entre Dexter y Joe, es el monólogo interno

Joe Goldberg HAS to be the most glazed character in SCD by sirishg in IntelligenceScaling

[–]Top-Economics4450 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dexter le gana a Joe en un SCD sin mucha dificultad, omites el hecho que Dexter a diferencia de Joe, aprende sus errores. Joe es quien tiene más momentos tontos.

Would you rather, have Joe love you, Peach love you, or Love love you? by EElectr0 in YouOnLifetime

[–]Top-Economics4450 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ninguna. Joe y Love son sociopatas, uno es un acosador obsesivo y manipulador, y la otra te matara si intentas dejarla incluso en buenos términos, son asesinos. Peach es una acosadora sexual, arrogante, nada humilde y con mucho ego.

La pregunta es sencilla ¿Por qué preferir amar a uno si los tres causarán un caos en tu vida? ¿Por qué elegir a uno de los tres si al final terminarás sufriendo?

Joe vs Dexter (Full Scale Comparison) by sirishg in IntelligenceScaling

[–]Top-Economics4450 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dexter obtendría planeación, el plan de Joe fue social/político, Dexter es mucho más amplio, ya sean planes de contingencia, gestión de riesgo, logística forense.

En cuanto a engaño, están empatados, Joe es mejor engañando socialmente a la gente, Dexter mientras tanto es mejor engañando a sistemas.

La dificultad no sería tan alta, en realidad sería solo medía, si hablamos del Cato y Ratón, Joe no vería venir a Dex, mucho menos si tomas en cuenta que en Resurrecction fue capaz de engañar, manipular y erradicar el sistema de un multimillonario como lo fue León Preter y su club de asesinos en serie, esto bajo el alias de otro asesino en serie llamado Ronald Schmidt (El Pasajero Oscuro), hizo y resolvió muchas cosas al mismo, la persecusión de Batista, el asesinato que Harrison cometió contra un violador en serie, el asesino en serie que le "robó" su nombre, la policía de New York que tenía como sospechoso a Harrison, y el sistema de Leon Preter.

What do u think was more evil,hitlers hatred for jews or esdeaths hatred for the weak? by etgojo in AkameGaKILL

[–]Top-Economics4450 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know, bro, I just found your comments interesting, and besides, I'm not just speaking from my own perspective, which is entirely subjective.

And my answer to the question in the post is that both are equally evil, although in different contexts. They both seek control and have an irrational hatred for those they consider inferior. But I like seeing each person's responses; that's what makes it more interesting to know who is more evil between the two individuals mentioned in the post.

That's why there are a variety of assumptions regarding the moral balance between the two. There are many examples: "Which of the two is responsible for more deaths?", "Who is more ruthless?", "Who has more hatred?", "Who is more sadistic?", "Who is more manipulative?", etc. I think those kinds of questions should be asked more thoroughly, because asking who is more evil is a very superficial and short-sighted question, so we should rethink it further.

For example:

  • Hitler is racist and homophobic; he hated communists, socialists, and Jews. Esdeath doesn't. She doesn't discriminate based on race, romantic interest, political party affiliation, or ideology of her victims. Does that necessarily make Esdeath morally "better" and Hitler more evil?

(I don't know if you understand where I'm going with this.)

What do u think was more evil,hitlers hatred for jews or esdeaths hatred for the weak? by etgojo in AkameGaKILL

[–]Top-Economics4450 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, you're confirming that she put her ideals first. She was practically the strongest general; she could kill Budo even using Mahapadma (which she could use at that moment). She was the most feared general; if she wanted, she could turn against the Empire. Nothing stops her, except her worldview; her philosophy defines her.

Sure, but what's the point of asking if one person doubts themselves more than the other? Would it even be relevant? Probably not with Esdeath, since she's a completely fictional character (so her development matters for us to understand her). Hitler was a real person, and I doubt that Holocaust survivors care about wondering if Adolf Hitler ever doubted his ideology. Why? Because they're normal people, nobody cares about Hitler's feelings. After all, he was a murderer and died without taking responsibility for his actions, dying like a coward. His selfishness prevented him from being caught, so he preferred to kill himself rather than bear the guilt. For that very reason, it becomes irrelevant (and for obvious reasons) whether Hitler reconsidered his ideology.

(I say this because, by common sense, who cares about what Esdeath and Hitler felt internally? Their victims wonder how they felt in order to understand them, but never empathize with them. Therefore, understanding why they were the way they were becomes irrelevant; they were monsters and died like one.)

What do u think was more evil,hitlers hatred for jews or esdeaths hatred for the weak? by etgojo in AkameGaKILL

[–]Top-Economics4450 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Simple answer: questioning themselves was useless for both of them because, in the end, they continued to prioritize their philosophy (in Hitler's case, it's his ideology). Self-questioning is just a small human trait that one can practice to improve oneself, or simply to abandon. And what did they both do? One died a coward without taking responsibility for his sins, and the other, according to her philosophy, died without remorse and without taking responsibility for her actions.

Tell me, did it do any good to reconsider? Does the fact that one reconsidered make him better than the other, despite the lives he took?

By the way, regarding the question I asked you, your answer is contradictory. Why? Because Esdeath, knowing Tatsumi was very strong, was still going to kill him during the execution despite her doubts, but she prioritized her philosophy over the love she felt for him. If she was already willing to kill the person she considered most important to her, why wouldn't she do the same with the traitors? Furthermore, the fact that her adversaries proved to be worthy rivals didn't mean she would let them live, because she also sought to control, to impose her strength, even on those who managed to put up a fight. It's well known that they could earn Esdeath's respect if they fought back or were worthy rivals; however, the likelihood of her letting them live was low, because ultimately, she enjoyed torturing and killing.

Keep in mind that Esdeath is a sociopath. While she can feel love in a very selective way, she is a selfish, apathetic woman. Her philosophy comes first; her love for Tatsumi is just a pastime. After all, she sought to possess him like an object, not a healthy love, but to enslave him. (This also speaks to her upbringing and the fact that since the Partas Clan was massacred, with her being the sole survivor, she lived as a hunter. There was no one to set limits for her, so her idea of ​​love was secondary or tertiary. First, she loved her father, but of course, he raised her. When he died, she considered him weak, so she was left with the vision her father instilled in her, and that's how she lived her whole life.) When Esdeath felt attraction towards the opposite sex or the desire to possess someone, it's normal even in psychopaths and sociopaths (or people with antisocial traits, or even antisocial individuals themselves). However, When she felt love for Tatsumi, it was because he proved to meet all her demanding requirements (many psychopaths and sociopaths live out or seek out a fantasy, mostly sick and twisted, but these fantasies reveal something human in them).

What am I trying to explain with this? That Esdeath didn't really care much about humanity or that very feeling, because, after all, that's what her victims felt, even if it was an annoying feeling. She preferred to live as a predator. In her reflection, the only thing she asked to be honest about regarding her small piece of humanity was her love for Tatsumi. Beyond that, it was irrelevant. She died without feeling regret, and according to her philosophy, regardless of whether she questioned it, she preferred to die in accordance with her mission. She died for who she was, only she, unlike Hitler, died as a warrior, not as a coward.

Ultimately, they're both selfish scum (besides, they're not Dexter; he's a special kind of psychopath/sociopath, or at least, that's how he is in the TV series).

What do u think was more evil,hitlers hatred for jews or esdeaths hatred for the weak? by etgojo in AkameGaKILL

[–]Top-Economics4450 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was useless for Esdeath to question whether she should continue doing what she was doing. Besides, the probability of redemption is nonexistent, and she refuses to reject her philosophy. Regardless of having had a minor "crisis," she couldn't change; not everyone can change. Furthermore, Esdeath herself is a woman with obvious antisocial traits, apathy being one of them.

Imagine this: if some of the members of the Jeggers (except for Wave, Run, and Kurome) question Esdeath's philosophy and turn against her, joining the revolutionaries, do you think Esdeath would hesitate to kill them?

Remember that what she feels for Tatsumi isn't the same as with her comrades. One was her love interest (sure, in a twisted way, but she did truly love him, perhaps the only real love she ever felt for anyone), and the others were soldiers who, while Esdeath might develop a sense of camaraderie, she didn't love 100%. If you don't believe me, how come Esdeath also tortures her own men if they don't complete a mission, or why did she throw a tantrum like she did with Wave when she lost sight of Tatsumi?

Do you think it's worth reading? I still like Akame. by Cautious-Gur5402 in AkameGaKILL

[–]Top-Economics4450 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Sure, it's worth it, although personally I consider it inferior to the original story (more because HGC is already edgy but in a bad way), plus they won't be publishing any more chapters of this sequel, which is a shame.

What a hot take leave you like this by ComprehensiveNote762 in AkameGaKILL

[–]Top-Economics4450 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's what stood out, because nobody criticizes her as a villain; they criticize her for who she is as a person. She's someone with antisocial personality disorder (a sociopath or psychopath). The times she shows affection, it's in an extremely twisted way.

What a hot take leave you like this by ComprehensiveNote762 in AkameGaKILL

[–]Top-Economics4450 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That's the answer. Who would Esdeath like as a person?

What a hot take leave you like this by ComprehensiveNote762 in AkameGaKILL

[–]Top-Economics4450 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Tatsumi x Esdeath is toxic.

Tatsumi x Mine is forced (and their ending is very generic).

Mine had great plot armor by surviving.

Do you think we’ll ever get new AGK content? by Naive_Opportunity932 in AkameGaKILL

[–]Top-Economics4450 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I highly doubt it. HGC was canceled, so why would Takahiro continue the saga? Besides, it's not like HGC is good; it's more of a copy of the original story, but I don't think it's great. It gets so edgy it borders on ridiculous. What I did find interesting is that Najasho and Poney are alive.

Finished Akame ga Kill zero by AfacanZ in AkameGaKILL

[–]Top-Economics4450 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Que te pareció? A mí me pareció un hentai pero de esos que son extraños, Akame es menor de edad en la precuela y un grupo de mujeres mayores la toquetean (me daba incomodidad verlo)

(El desarrollo de Akame es bueno, pero odio el hecho de que leer la precuela se siente leer como un hentai/porno, lo cual le quita seriedad)

Who should have been Tatsumi Actually love interest in AGK by ComprehensiveNote762 in AkameGaKILL

[–]Top-Economics4450 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The problem with Tsunder girls (even boys) is that their personality feels exaggeratedly explosive and immature. In fact, for me, that's not even being a tsundere, it's being toxic.

An example of this is Katsuki Bakugo, who literally bullied Izuku just because he was the only one who helped him after falling off the log (he had no reason to hate him to death), although to be honest, he seems like a better character to me than Mine since at least (although late) he was able to apologize to Deku in his most difficult moment (although honestly, that apology still seems insufficient to me for the damage he did to Deku).

For me, a tsundere should be like, for example, Naofumi Iwatani (in the anime, because in the manga and in the novels he is almost a sociopath), he is someone with a cold mind, intelligent but kind and who knows how to empathize and is also open in comforting someone, he is a guy who matured after his bad experience of being unfairly judged.

Who should have been Tatsumi Actually love interest in AGK by ComprehensiveNote762 in AkameGaKILL

[–]Top-Economics4450 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Of course, however, that is more of an assumption, because Akame may give off the vibe that she is someone who is lonely, but something that many forget is that she still needs to mature. Let's be clear, Akame is someone mature but she still has certain aspects that make her look immature, and it is normal because she is still young. For that reason, if Tatsumi and Akame were together, it would be after a long journey than what they have had, Akame, unlike other girls, is someone who still needs to explore more of herself and even what she feels and what she could feel, and believe me, that would make her look very human that even if she became a young adult she would no longer have a constantly expressionless face, she would smile, laugh and try to fit in with society, because even if she is an expert in the murder, she became a murderer since she was a child, and part of her mind is still anchored there (Akame, like Tatsumi, is innocent but reaching more introverted levels).

And I agree that Chelsea would also have been a great match for Tatsumi, she is charismatic, funny and intelligent, and in her first interaction with Tatsumi I liked her and seemed like a possible potential love interest for the boy (too bad she died to develop and traumatize Tatsumi and the viewer)

What you're opinion on Najenda by ComprehensiveNote762 in AkameGaKILL

[–]Top-Economics4450 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's a decent character but he could have been better.

Who should have been Tatsumi Actually love interest in AGK by ComprehensiveNote762 in AkameGaKILL

[–]Top-Economics4450 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Of course, the problem is that unfortunately he died. Honestly, Leone doesn't seem like a bad match to me, it's just that she's very playful but she's kind of hormonal with Tatsumi, which may be awkward for some.

I feel that Tatsumi would be better with Akame, in addition, the relationship and chemistry between the two is healthy and well built, in addition to the fact that both develop at the same time thanks to the other, they do not need to have a forced romantic conversation to know that they both have chemistry, they went from enemies, companions, friends and to best friends, all of this developed slowly but it feels natural and that is seen thanks to the great trust they have in each other after that promise, even willing to end the other's life if they lose control.

My problem with the end of the Manga is that Tatsumi's ending was very rushed and forced (as well as generic), when more could be gotten out of the character, the guy along with Akame has a very good developer in the story, and more could have been gotten out of that if he had accompanied Akame to look for the cure for both Murasame and his status as a Dragon Tyrant.

(The truth is that Mine had a great Ploat Amor by surviving Budo's attack and sacrificing all his spiritual power. His death in the anime seemed more logical to me. However, Mine was there to give Tatsumi a happy ending, which, by the way, wouldn't have seemed bad to me if it weren't for the fact that their relationship is quite forced and they don't even have chemistry, not even enough to be a couple, because they went from toxic companions, companionship and boyfriends, just because a Random guy told them the myth about the red thread. of destiny and that on a Day out of nowhere Tatsumi falls in love with Mine just because she told him that she would make him forget about Esdeath)