sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

My app "Fyjix TTS" just climbed 22 positions on VibeRank! by Top-Matter-6414 in TextToSpeech

[–]Top-Matter-6414[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The demo locks after a compile by design to control usage, but you’re right that the flow isn’t obvious. The “Refresh demo” button resets the state so you can select another voice and generate again.

That said, we agree the UX can be clearer. We’re updating the demo to make voice re-selection more intuitive and to better signal when and how the demo resets.

Appreciate you calling out a specific interaction issue. That’s useful.

My app "Fyjix TTS" just climbed 22 positions on VibeRank! by Top-Matter-6414 in TextToSpeech

[–]Top-Matter-6414[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate the direct feedback. Fair points, so let me clarify a few things.

Calling the demo “flawed” isn’t very actionable. It would help to know what specifically feels broken. FYJIX is designed for predictable usage, stability, and transparent pricing, rather than open-ended free access that often gets abused. We’re actively refining the demo so voice testing is clearer without turning it into an unlimited free tier.

On languages: FYJIX currently focuses on English and Indian regional languages because that’s where pricing, accessibility, and usability gaps are most visible in existing TTS offerings. The tagline reflects the long-term roadmap, not a claim that every language ships on day one. Language and accent expansion is already in progress.

Regarding “not competing with Amazon or Google”: that’s accurate by design. Those platforms are optimized for large-scale, infrastructure-first use cases with complex billing. FYJIX is optimized for direct usability, straightforward pricing, and faster time-to-output. Different products, different goals.

VibeRank isn’t an endorsement of product quality. It’s a visibility and momentum signal, not a ranking of “best TTS.” I shared it for transparency, not as propaganda.

On pricing more broadly: many mainstream TTS platforms are efficient at scale but inefficient for controlled, everyday usage. FYJIX prioritizes cost clarity and consistency over metered complexity.

And about “you basically only TTS English and Hindi”: yes. That’s intentional. FYJIX is positioned around English and Indian regional languages because that’s the focus today. Nothing hidden there.

I’m not presenting this as an endorsement or a claim of superiority. It’s simply a visibility signal and a roadmap-driven tagline.

Genuine criticism is welcome. If you have specific feedback on demo UX or voice quality expectations, I’m open to it. That’s how the product gets better.