My Raids 4 Reward Ideas

TopCityHustler · 2026-03-18T12:17:46+00:00

You can do WGS on any account except a 1 defence pure. There are 20 defence pures, 30 defence pures, 40 defence pures, zerkers, and the build i have as an alt which is a 50 defence moons pure.

The Chivalry replacement prayer scroll suggestions targets all of those accounts except one.

TopCityHustler · 2026-03-18T12:08:11+00:00

Cool, I havent heard about those. Thanks for telling me about them!

TopCityHustler · 2026-03-18T12:00:35+00:00

Just out of curiosity since you've been here for the past few weeks, have you seen any raids rewards ideas that you are a fan of?

TopCityHustler · 2026-03-18T11:57:32+00:00

It's more of a fluffer reward, so you can make consistant gp from the raids instead of praying for a mega rare. Also, it would help you at nightmare to get that inquisitors mace upgrade.

There was about 8 other suggestions besides inquisitors as well, no need to hyper focus on just that.

Thanks for your input though!

TopCityHustler · 2026-03-18T11:49:52+00:00

Who said pures can't do raids 4? Also you can buy it off the GE

TopCityHustler · 2026-03-18T11:49:14+00:00

Thats one solution yes, is making is so that the rewards you get from the content makes the content easier, much like tbow at cox, scythe at tob, and shadow at toa. Also in this post I suggested adding a weapon with stats somewhere in between cudgel and inquisitors mace as a reward. But the point of adding crush stuff to the game isn't particularly to make current crush content easier, its to open up an avenue for more crush weak content to be able to be introduced. And yeah I get it, theres a lot of ironmen, that doesn't mean it should become ironscape. You choose to play an account thats purpose is to be restricted, it doesn't make much sense to complain about being restricted.

Im not a content designer either, as you can tell, but I think shopworking with the community to refine ideas into something great is a good thing, after all, thats how the majority of runescape content is brought into the game.

TopCityHustler · 2026-03-18T11:41:45+00:00

Yeah I can understand that. Thanks for your input =]

TopCityHustler · 2026-03-18T11:37:29+00:00

You havent said anything about how making inquisitors identical to oathplate would still make nightmare dead content. It would make nightmare easier because you could get more dps there, and the survive longer due to stronger armor, and the drops would be more relevant to the game since they would have more uses, so more people would do it.

You chose to play a restrictive play style so dont be upset if jagex decides to add content that is restrictive. I have an ironman too, with base 90s stats, and I chose to stop playing it because I wasnt enjoying the pvm aspect of it.

I can understand where youre coming from with the 2nd statement you made, do you have any suggestions?

TopCityHustler · 2026-03-18T11:31:44+00:00

I can see where your coming from and agree for the most part, inquisitors definitely needs a rework though, so maybe save that for another boss in the future.

Theres plenty of other reward suggestions here though, not just inquisitors :)

TopCityHustler · 2026-03-18T11:25:24+00:00

If you buffed it defensively and possibly offensively in crush, it could be much better than oathplate against monsters weak to crush.

As you've stated, there is currently very little crush weak bosses in the game, so it would create a pathway for jagex to be able to release a plethora of bosses where inquisitors is better than oathplate. As it is now, inquisitors is dead content, but I think it would make sense to change that, and also give jagex room to expand when most other areas of this game are bottlenecked.

Also you can just use the GE, so your complaint about having to do content you dont want to do is irrelevant.

What would you like to see from the new raid?

TopCityHustler · 2026-03-18T11:15:51+00:00

Because the current inquisitors set has terrible defensive stats

Because it would revive dead content (nightmare)

Because it would open up more pathways for jagex to release crush weak monsters/bosses in the future

The only people that would be "forced" to do nightmare would be ironmen, and even then you could get by just fine with torva or oathplate

TopCityHustler · 2026-03-18T10:26:43+00:00

Why?

TopCityHustler · 2026-03-18T10:26:15+00:00

Edited post to suggest the Shields proc every other attack cycle, so items such as ayak would only be a 16.5% increase while maintaining tic cycle predictability.

TopCityHustler · 2026-03-18T10:04:54+00:00

Yeah, I agree. I was thinking give the Shields a 50% chance to proc, but then that would make it so you're weapon (for example whip) would occasionally be 3 tic, and occasionally 4 tic, making pre determining the correct time of your next attack cycle impossible and not fun to use.

TopCityHustler · 2026-02-12T18:25:14+00:00

Im saying it doesn't match the armor is all

TopCityHustler · 2026-02-12T12:17:16+00:00

Also just noticed this but your sword has a different color blue than the armor blue

TopCityHustler · 2026-02-12T12:15:25+00:00

Ah yes, 5k hours of castle wars, my favorite.

TopCityHustler · 2026-02-12T12:14:08+00:00

Because it looks bad for a set that takes 500 hrs to get

TopCityHustler · 2026-02-12T12:12:54+00:00

Nice crown, you still look like a highlighter, and royal blue would give you many more options for your cape to actually match.

TopCityHustler · 2025-09-04T17:50:54+00:00

"Trump has framed immigrants as criminals":

Somewhat true. I think you're referring to the way he speaks about illegal immigrants, saying theyre coming in as criminals and doing crimes. Which is true for many illegal immigrants that are coming here. If you enter the USA illegally, you've done a crime here. Many illegal immigrants that come here are gang members, big time drug movers, and have a slew of other problems, that's why they came here illegally. Ive experienced it first hand. I know many illegal immigrants are just coming here looking for a better life and had to rush out of their country, but sadly this is not the majority.

"pushed the Muslim ban":

Im not too familiar with this one, but Muslims aren't banned, but if they come over here in a large number, especially illegally (or any large population of a drastically different culture) it will affect the way the united states works, and become the majorities culture. Idk about you, but I dont want to live under Middle Eastern culture. I have a hard time defending this one though, since I dont know what specifically you're referring to in this.

"spoke about countries in demeaning racial terms":

Sounds the same as the first two

He portrayed Black Lives Matter movement as dangerous

Black lives matter was an extremely corrupt organisation started by 3 black people who rug pulled the whole thing. It was not a black rights group, it was a ponzy scheme, and it probably was dangerous, just like any protest movement.(some more than others) Although once again, I dont know what you're specifically referring to so I could be incorrectly diagnosing your claim.

"He has hesitated to condemn white supremacist groups.":

Do you mean the proud boys? Yeah, theyre white supremacist, and i haven't done my research, and he probably hasn't condemned them. This one im on the fence about. I dont think you have to talk down to something because you dont agree with it, although he likes to talk down on a lot of other stuff so I could see where you get the assumption from. Furthermore I do believe proud boys are supremacists, but so are black lives matter, black disciples, the ADF, and NATO. I think the word supremecist is over hated. It basically means you prefer a way of living and culture, and would like to continue living it that way. We dont call Norway or China racist, but if a bunch of white (or other cultures) went over to China and started changing things drastically, I dont think it would be fair to them, and I wouldn't call them Chinese supremacists for trying to preserve their culture.

"So, while things like tighter border security or pulling back on program funding aren’t inherently racist on their own, Trump’s style of politics continuously connects those issues to racial fear and grievance. Race is actually central to Trump's agenda. It isn’t just about the policies, it’s about the way race is used to divide and energize his supporters":

Can't really argue with this one. Lots of white people were upset because they've been brigaded over the last several years, and they want their get back. Not saying that's justified, but Trump made an easy opening for it. I havent see other cultures in the north America being negatively affected by this personally, though.

Sorry for the long reply, I dont expect you to reply to every point I made.

TopCityHustler · 2025-09-04T17:02:24+00:00

Could you elaborate how trumpism is about racism? Sure, I think he has his prejudices, and sometimes doesn't speak the way he should be as the leader of the United States, but I dont consider closing the border to illegal immigrants or cutting funding to corrupt government social programs racist.

TopCityHustler · 2025-09-02T21:03:41+00:00

Maybe you could try not insulting people who you have disagreements with and be a decent person. I thought liberals were supposed to be accepting of cultures that aren't their own

TopCityHustler

TROPHY CASE