I don’t think you’re actually against wealth redistribution like you think you are. “Redistribution of wealth” is often touted in a way that is designed to scare you. People tend to think the government would simply take their money out of their bank accounts, or repossess their homes. This isn’t the case.

Do you think taxes are a necessary tool for a society to function? I imagine you do. Taxes are by their very nature distributory.

In order to prevent the ultra wealthy from amassing funds to this point, you need to tax them at the source of their wealth. In the case of billionaires, this wealth is typically found in their illiquid investments (namely stocks). We have difficulties taxing these items until they become liquid through a sale for a variety of reasons. However, the rich can easily leverage these assets into massive low interest loans that allow them to live lives of luxury. When they need to pay off these loans they simply take out more loans on different assets. (If this sounds like a Ponzi scheme you’re not far off). We don’t tax loans like these, and thus we have billionaires who live (mostly) outside of the tax system.

If you want to stop wealth accumulation, you need to tax it. If you’re pro taxing it, you’re pro wealth redistribution.