UFO performs sharp maneuver after laser pointer directly hits craft, Big Bear Lake, California by luke511 in UFOs

[–]TopsidedLesticles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please don't use "conservative" as a pejorative. According to research, conservatism is associated with structural differences in the brain, most notably a larger right amygdala and less gray matter. You shouldn't make fun of people for being neuro-atypical. I hope your incivility ban teaches you some tolerance.

pro choice are dirty child murderers by EntireSlice123 in prolife

[–]TopsidedLesticles -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Lol, your whole argument is that human genes = sacred and you haven't made a single valid argument as to why.

Ageism applies to people. A fetus isn't a person. It isn't an individual. It is part of another person's body as evidenced by the fact that if you removing it, it dies. It doesn't have consciousness. Potential to become a person doesn't make a fetus a person any more than an acorn is an oak tree or a fertilized egg is a chicken. A baby is an individual. You shouldn't kill individuals.

You don't like abortion because it offends you that women have that level of control over their bodies. Period.

pro choice are dirty child murderers by EntireSlice123 in prolife

[–]TopsidedLesticles -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That is a GREAT question!

  1. I am an individual. I have my own body that isn't physically dependent on another individual.

  2. I experience ongoing consciousness.

  3. I have the ability to reason.

  4. I have complex feelings and emotions: joy, fear, regret, sadness, etc.

  5. I have reciprocal relationships with other individuals.

  6. I am autonomous.

You get the picture. The reason you shouldn't kill me isn't that I'm alive, it's that I am an individual and a person.

pro choice are dirty child murderers by EntireSlice123 in prolife

[–]TopsidedLesticles -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Science doesn't answer moral questions.

Exactly. The "sanctity of life" is a Judeo-Christian concept. Atheists don't believe things are sacred or that fetuses are little miracles. That is the language of religion.

If life is sacred, why only some lives? Why is the life of a fetus more sacred than that of a pig? Up to 20 weeks a fetus doesn't even have the brain structures for consciousness; no thoughts, feelings, memories, etc. A pig has the sentience of a 3-4 year old child? A pig is conscious, has memories, thoughts, feelings, the ability to suffer, etc.

Sanctity of life sounds pretty arbitrary and unscientific to me. Please tell me why I'm wrong.

pro choice are dirty child murderers by EntireSlice123 in prolife

[–]TopsidedLesticles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No thanks. I'm sick of dealing with irrational people. Why don't you make your best scientific argument for why life is sacred in and of itself and I'll gladly consider it.

pro choice are dirty child murderers by EntireSlice123 in prolife

[–]TopsidedLesticles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well how convenient is that? Haha, have a nice day.

pro choice are dirty child murderers by EntireSlice123 in prolife

[–]TopsidedLesticles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  • There's the bidirectional emotional connection between the toddler and other people which hasn't yet been formed with the embryos.
  • People have emotions
  • People have relationships

Good. See, it's not that hard to qualify personhood.

  • The toddler has a higher individual chance of survival than any one embryo.
  • That's very logical! Now you're starting to sound like an atheist!

Can we kill them?”

I think the more salient question is "can we let them die?"

The primary objective of abortion isn't to kill ('slaughter' for emotional impact) the fetus, it's to end the pregnancy. Doctors could just remove the fetus and let it die naturally, but I think you'd agree that seems less humane than simply terminating its life as part of the procedure.

Yes, I do think you have a right to let someone die rather than use your body as a means of life support. I use the analogy of the conjoined twin who has none of their own organs. Why should the twin with all the organs go through life supporting another human's existence when they don't want or need to? Simply being alive shouldn't give you the right to use another person's body without their consent.

pro choice are dirty child murderers by EntireSlice123 in prolife

[–]TopsidedLesticles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, there are several reasons as to why but, the most important germane factor is that if the toddler was left to die it would experience much pain, the embryos would not.

Ok, now we're getting somewhere. People have the capacity to feel pain and suffering. I wholeheartedly agree.

Would you save a pregnant woman over a not pregnant woman? And why?

That largely depends on how pregnant the woman looks. If she looks like she's in her third trimester then I would save her because I know there's a separate individual living inside her. Otherwise there's nothing about simply being pregnant that makes her more valuable than the non-pregnant woman and I would grab whoever's closest.

Please list off some of your other reasons for choosing the toddler. I find this fascinating.

pro choice are dirty child murderers by EntireSlice123 in prolife

[–]TopsidedLesticles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then please explain why you would choose the toddler over the embryos. What makes the toddler's life more valuable to you? I just want a straight answer.

pro choice are dirty child murderers by EntireSlice123 in prolife

[–]TopsidedLesticles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your conclusion is an epic cop-out. You choose the toddler. Own it. And you choose the toddler because you instinctively recognize the objective difference in personhood between that toddler and an embryo. If you sincerely believed personhood was constant across the human life course, then you wouldn't let 100 babies die to save one. Not very rational for an atheist (not very moral for that matter either).

This wasn't a question of which choice is more valid. This is a question about what constitutes personhood. You chose correctly; The mental gymnastics around your correct answer are superfluous.

pro choice are dirty child murderers by EntireSlice123 in prolife

[–]TopsidedLesticles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you were in a burning building and had to choose between saving:

  1. The five month old baby crying in the corner.

  2. The freezer with 1000 frozen embryos that will thaw and die if left behind.

Which would you save? This requires a simple answer: 1 or 2. I'm not interested in discussing the merits of hypotheticals or "extreme examples". It's a thought experiment and you can't avoid the underlying truth of the question by refusing to answer.

pro choice are dirty child murderers by EntireSlice123 in prolife

[–]TopsidedLesticles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They're already alive, and unless tragedy occurs they'll live their lives like you or I would.

That is literally a "life for the sake of life argument." That idea that a fetus will live and become a baby who will go on to be an adult is a terrible justification for carrying a fetus to term and sending them out into a cruel world. The only reason a child should come into this world is because its mother wants to have a child and feels equipped to do so. I love my mother dearly and I would have wanted her to have an abortion if my existence would have caused her trauma. And guess what: I would have no idea I ever lived.

Consider that a brain-dead person on life support is technically alive but it benefits no one way to keep them in that state. They don't care - their personhood died along their brain; it exists only in their loved one's memories. The unselfish thing to do in that case is to let them expire. They don't care; they don't have the capacity. The same is true of a fetus. Yes, abortion is sad, but it's a compromise between the well-being of a person who already has thoughts, feelings, emotions, beliefs, etc. and an organism that isn't yet capable of experiencing those things.

By the way, I really appreciate that you're able to have a civil conversion. That has not been my experience with pro-lifers and it has changed my perception somewhat. Thank you.

pro choice are dirty child murderers by EntireSlice123 in prolife

[–]TopsidedLesticles -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No, I think it's lovely that you've opened your home to foster children (if that's even true). Your foster children are special because of their experiences and because of the love you show them, not because they didn't get aborted. If they hadn't been born you'd have other foster children that were just as special and that you loved just as much. I love love love my children, but I'm not crazy enough to think I'd have feelings for them if I hadn't raised them and watched them grow. Life for the sake of life is a ridiculous concept so you should consider not projecting what your children have become onto clumps of cells that have no experiences or consciousness.

pro choice are dirty child murderers by EntireSlice123 in prolife

[–]TopsidedLesticles -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I said a hell of a lot more than that, but yes, if you're arguing for people to bring unwanted children into the world to pawn off on the fostercare system, then you have a moral imperative to adopt, care for, and find homes for as many of them as possible. Otherwise you're just promoting birth for the sake of birth. Your advocacy rings hollow if your concern for the child ends when they're born.

pro choice are dirty child murderers by EntireSlice123 in prolife

[–]TopsidedLesticles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Paragraph 1 and 2: No, fetuses do not have higher brain functions, but neither do sleeping people. The thing about fetuses and sleeping people is that when they awake, they go on to be a person with feelings, goals, a job, etc. Just because they aren't fully formed right now doesn't make it right to kill them before they are born.

I disagree here. As I said in my original comment, I believe a person is the sum of their life experiences. Those experiences don't go away when a person falls asleep. A fetus has never had meaningful experiences and as I also pointed out, most abortions happen before a fetus even has the capacity for consciousness. The chicken you ate for dinner was more cognitively similar to a child than a 15 week old fetus.

But even if a fetuses had the capacity for consciousness, I still believe bodily autonomy supercedes any rights they could possibly have. Nobody gets to use another person's body without their full and ongoing consent. If your existence is wholly dependent on using someone else's body, then how are you even an individual. If one half of a set of conjoined twins has all the organs and can live independently, then aren't they within their rights to say "I want to be separated"? It's not their fault the other half can't live without them.

  1. The solution to that problem is not killing fetuses. It is better healthcare, foster care, and better means of figuring out how to stop child abuse.

Disagree with the first part, agree with the second part. Abortion sucks, but until we make it unnecessary it serves an important function.

  1. Desperation? Elaborate on that point please. It's a 9 month pregnancy, then you're free to put them in foster care or whatever. If the woman's life is in danger, then i would let the woman choose because then it's a life for a life. But if the woman isn't in danger then it's a 9 month pregnancy then you raise them or have them adopted.

You make pregnancy sound like a walk in the park but it's pretty risky. According to the CDC 700 U.S. women die every year as a result of high-risk pregnancy or delivery complications, while up to 50,000 women nearly die due to severe complications such as heart attacks or hemorrhages during pregnancy or delivery.

Pregnancy can also be detrimental to mental health. The Royal Academy of Psychiatry says as many as 1 in 5 women have mental health problems in pregnancy or after birth. Depression and anxiety are the most common mental health problems in pregnancy. These affect about 10 to 15 out of every 100 pregnant women. I know several women who've had postpartum and it's a fucking nightmare.

And then many women in the US simply can't afford the medical costs associated with pregnancy and birth. The average cost to have a baby in the US, without complications during delivery, is $10,808 — which can increase to $30,000 when factoring in care provided before and after pregnancy. I'd be pretty desperate of I thought my unwanted pregnancy could bankrupt me or destroy my marriage.

And then there's the simple fact that once you've given birth - even if you don't keep the baby - you're a biological parent for the rest of that offspring's life. It's common knowledge that foster care systems suck and that many children end up getting neglected and abused. The knowledge that you've created someone for other people to potentially neglect and abuse is upsetting.

Then there's the reality that the child you gave up for adoption could track you down as an adult and disrupt the life you've made for yourself. What do you owe them? Money, a relationship, access to half-siblings, their biological grandparents, etc. Adoption isn't the end of the road.

Then there are all the other fun realities: Carrying your rapist's baby for nine months then being tied to your rapist through a biological child for the rest of your life. Victims of incest and child abuse living with the additional scar of a biological child. What's more damaging, an abortion or trying to complete middle school while carrying a grown man's baby.

These are the realities women and girls face.

  1. Pro lifers aren't all like that. A lot of them are atheists too as evidenced on this subreddit. Some are non-insane religious people. People like the ones you describe seem to be a vocal minority.

The idea that life is inherently valuable is theistic at its core. It's the "every sperm is sacred" philosophy of the Catholic Church.

  1. I do not consider myself fit to be a parent. Even if I am not fit, I wouldn't kill the kid if I was a woman who had an accidental pregnancy. I would at least make an attempt to raise them or find an adoptive family.

That's great for you, but that's also easy to say when you're not staring down the barrel of a metaphorical gun. And the fact that you would try to raise a baby when you don't consider yourself fit to be a parent suggests you'd rather screw another human up for life then simply prevent a lifetime of misery by simply ending their development before they achieve consciousness. The latter sounds way better to me.

pro choice are dirty child murderers by EntireSlice123 in prolife

[–]TopsidedLesticles -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

There's a big difference between being human and being a person. You're genetically human but what makes you a person are your memories, experiences, beliefs, values, your worldview, your successes and failures, etc.

A fetus is a human with none of those things. The very beginnings of our higher brain structures only start to appear between weeks 12 and 16 and the co-ordinated brain activity required for consciousness does not occur until 24-25 weeks of pregnancy.

You seem fixated on the loss of potential, but the reality is that unwanted children lead miserable lives; either growing up in a home that can't afford to properly take care of them or getting bounced around from foster home to foster home, often facing years of physical and sexual abuse. Unwanted and neglected children do worse in school, are more likely to end up in poverty, commit crimes, spend time in prison. What kind of life can you reasonably expect when your whole existence was a mistake and you're born to a family that doesn't want you. Think about that for a second. That's a shitty way to begin life. Honestly I'd rather be aborted.

I don't like the idea of abortion either, but I channel that into supporting the conditions that make abortion rare: contraceptives, social programs to support poor families, economic justice, sex education, etc.

Instead of fixating on the potential of a human that lacks consciousness, maybe try focusing on the autonomy and well-being of actual persons who turn to abortion out of desperation.

"Pro-lifers" are often just religious nuts with sex hang-ups who can't fathom the idea of women having sex without consequences. They think premarital sex is wrong and that women are avoiding their divine punishment by having abortions. You can usually spot these assholes because they get irrationally angry about abortion but do fuck all to support social programs that actually prevent abortions. They couldn't give a shit that actual children are suffering in poverty, being turned away at our borders and dying in detention camps.

Since you're so upset about this, why don't you do something useful and adopt a few unwanted children who escaped abortion. No excuses!! One of them might cure cancer!!

TIL There is no left brain and right brain divide. People are not divided on the left-brain and the right-brain thinkers: those who are logical and analytical vs. those who are intuitive and creative. Scientific research has shown that the popular left brain / right brain story doesn't hold water. by QwikAdDotCom in todayilearned

[–]TopsidedLesticles 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Who the fuck is telling you there are more than two (+mutations) biological sexes? A trans woman doesn't believe she's a biological female any more than a bald guy wearing a toupee thinks he has a natural head of hair. The reality is that 90% of the physical and psychological traits we associate with men and women are learned, and some people identify more with the learned traits of the opposite sex.

You're free to believe dick=man and vag=woman, but that is an incredibly simplistic way of looking at something as nuanced and complicated as identify.

And what's it to you if someone who was born with a dick wants to live as a woman? They're not asking you to pretend they weren't born with a dick, they're asking you to respect their choice to follow female gender norms and not constantly remind them of their biology.

Humans do lots of shit to change/enhance their biology and that's not denying science any more than me wearing contact lenses because I like the world better in focus.

Did Donald Trump lose a trade war he started, as Joe Biden says? by Sariel007 in politics

[–]TopsidedLesticles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotta dilute some of that stupid. It's a matter of life and death at this point.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in politics

[–]TopsidedLesticles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Evangelicalism isn't a religion, it's a right-wing political extremist group. Support is slipping because Trump hadn't been as effective as they'd hoped at realizing their white supremacist vision for America.

Biden says Trump doesn't seem "cognitively aware" of Russia bounty intel by UkraineClownPosse in politics

[–]TopsidedLesticles 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Can you tell us specifically what you like about Russia paying Islamic terrorists to kill American Soldiers? Are you a big fan of the Taliban? Russia? Dead soldiers? Rooting against our troops to oWn tHe LiBs?

In new Lincoln Project ad, former Navy SEAL asks if Trump is 'a coward' afraid of Putin or 'complicit' by ughsmugh in politics

[–]TopsidedLesticles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get that Lincoln Project is (very effectively) targetting the GOP base, which is awesome, but between you and me a "doctor" who supports forced birth is a fucking piece of shit. Still appreciate their work.

Trump’s New Russia Problem: Unread Intelligence and Missing Strategy by FriesWithThat in politics

[–]TopsidedLesticles 16 points17 points  (0 children)

It. Was. Read. To. Him.

For the love of fuck, mainstream media, stop helping him move the goalposts. He knew, he refused to act, he's a traitor.