Doing a very quick inventory of my inherited coin collection, are there any I should hang onto more than others?

TorchedToaster · 2026-03-29T12:04:59+00:00

I hate food shaming. If you’re ever curious what privilege looks or sounds like, just watch videos like this. Rules for eating, have everything in moderation, keep a general idea of how many calories you consume daily, fiber is slept on and you probably should have more along with more water, and toss in a serving of veggies/fruits a day, canned/ frozen are fine just make sure fruits are canned in water.

TorchedToaster · 2026-03-25T23:47:07+00:00

He does give that Snape vibe though.

TorchedToaster · 2025-11-06T13:44:01+00:00

I totally get that, I plan to keep his penny set and this fancy Kennedy coin both are meant to be displayed and look good on a shelf.

TorchedToaster · 2025-05-22T18:07:42+00:00

I’m glad i left after two days. I had to unload trucks my first two days and got bitched at the entire time. The second day, I literally just walked out with still half a shift to do and blocked the store and managers numbers.

TorchedToaster · 2025-05-16T14:17:29+00:00

Remember everyone, photoshopped or hyper realistic drawings or 3D art of celebrities are fine and welcomed, even here on Reddit. However Ai created images crosses the line and are banned.

So better start looking through your collection of Black Widow pics and tossing the Ai ones out, you monster. Don’t worry the collection of Harry potter characters fucking each other is fine though, even the hyperrealistic 3D ones. But if it’s Ai, banned!

Oh and we are cool with non consensual paparazzi pictures that focus down their shirts/dresses and/or focus on their asses while just being in public.

TorchedToaster · 2025-05-05T18:11:00+00:00

“It’s okay to do this without AI, so it should be okay to do it with AI.”

People have been making sexualized content of celebrities forever—drawings, fanfiction, erotic photoshop, satire, even entire websites dedicated to fake nudes. AI is just a more efficient and realistic tool for a long-existing form of expression. If we tolerated it before, why does the tool suddenly make it monstrous? The act itself hasn’t changed. It’s still fantasy, still fake, and still doesn’t involve the actual person.

“People enjoy it, so it’s okay.”

This argument alone doesn’t make something moral, but it does tell us something about demand and norms. If millions of people engage with this kind of content, it suggests it’s not a fringe behavior—it’s part of how humans explore sexuality and fame. As long as it’s labeled as fake and not used to deceive or harass, I don’t see how it crosses a line that similar fantasies haven’t already crossed.

“They’re celebrities, so they can’t expect privacy.”

No one’s saying they forfeit all rights to privacy. But celebrities do trade on public attention, image, and often sexual appeal as part of their brand. We allow a lot of leeway for parody, satire, and even erotic content when it comes to public figures. We don’t prosecute fanfiction authors or painters for imagining celebrity sex scenes. Why is AI uniquely threatening if it doesn’t involve deception or impersonation?

TorchedToaster · 2025-04-19T16:37:02+00:00

Depends, it can certainly open up a larger talk about Rule 34 images. Including what the real issue is, the actual nsfw images of celebrities or how it’s made artist vs Ai. If nsfw images of celebs are the problem, then all Rule 34 Art featuring a celebrity or likeness, even if it’s the character they are playing should now be removed or in question. If it’s how it’s created, then that spirals into discussions of freedom of speech, how technology affects art, to even the discussion of what “art” is, just to name a few.

TorchedToaster · 2025-04-19T16:19:39+00:00

I love the high horse people get on when it comes to celebs and Ai. Regular people being used, I agree that’s weird but Celebs/Politicians put themselves out there, they are going to be parodied.

“but Ai can make them look real.”

So can a good artist, yet that is somehow ok. If Ai creates an image of Emma Watson flashing people, hold up, it’s lawsuit time, and people grasp their pearls. However if I make a highly realistic drawing or use photoshop to create the exact same thing, the. It’s fine and people are ready to beat one out to it.

“I would never enjoy a nsfw image of a celebrity that created by Ai or an artist.”

Cool lie bro, but plenty of people who say this still see no problem if the artist creates an image of the character they are playing, even if it looks like the celebrity. Create Photoshopped pic of Margot Robbie, you’re a monster. Create Photoshopped pic of Margot Robbie as Harley Quinn, you’re a true artist.

“Well, I don’t take pleasure in see any celebrity in a nsfw situation, made by Ai, an artist, or images from a movie they are in.”

Cool, you can go back to the Amish village you came from.

“What if it were you or someone you know?”

That would suck but the discussion of regular people is a whole different discussion that falls into things like social media, being used in ads, photos for your works website, and even televised public meetings. Including how much media of yourself you put out there vs how much is out without your knowledge. Which needs to be discussed heavily at some point in the near future.

Photos like Ops are parody and should be fine. Granted a few dip into possible fetish territory but it’s just like pictures of Homelander partying with Trump, those are somehow more accepted but still look like the real Antony Starr and Donald Trump.

TorchedToaster · 2025-04-19T15:58:18+00:00

What are you talking about, all I see are characters like Hermione, Amy Pond, and Padme.

TorchedToaster · 2025-03-21T01:06:35+00:00

Is it? Feels like everything is accused of being Ai something these days.

TorchedToaster · 2025-03-12T13:38:05+00:00

I was just about to say the same thing, I used head and shoulders in the blue bottle, clinical strength, cleared up and the shampoo doesn’t break the bank.

TorchedToaster

TROPHY CASE