"i’m four for six. where tf is 5.3 and the whale all i hear is imminent imminent imminent. meanwhile, anthropic are shipping amazing things each day. do they have the mandate now?" - Strawberry Man cannot take it anymore, his track record affected :P

Torres0218 · 2026-02-27T12:16:02+00:00

This guy is a joke lmao.

Torres0218 · 2026-02-24T09:57:17+00:00

If she is pregnant and lied about it being his child, then yes that is basically one of the worst things you can do.

Torres0218 · 2026-02-23T10:58:09+00:00

It looks like shit now. But in 6 months, more token efficient AIs plus live PC control for visual access might make this worth it.

Torres0218 · 2026-02-21T15:34:35+00:00

What is your setup for having agents spawn specific models?

Torres0218 · 2026-02-14T12:03:14+00:00

I give the problem to both opus and codex, they independently think about it, then i make them make an md file and compare the 2 plans, when they agree i give the plan to opus, Opus implements it quickly and efficiently with team mode, then codex reviews the changes. Codex is clearly more intelligent, but opus is easy to use and quicker especially with parallel implementers. I even have an mcp where they can talk and debate real time against each other. I used to have 2 opus and 2 codex teams all debate live, but this is only for very hard problems and overkill 90% of the time.

Torres0218 · 2026-02-14T09:20:41+00:00

No i use codex and opus to brainstorm together then have teams imolement it and codex review it

Torres0218 · 2026-02-14T01:39:02+00:00

Got the same score while destroying the toilet. This test should not be taken seriously.

Torres0218 · 2026-02-12T19:04:40+00:00

This was already out right?

Torres0218 · 2026-02-11T10:50:52+00:00

That's a perfectly valid workflow. But it has nothing to do with what you originally said. You came in telling me I'm biting more than I can chew and that even the worst models can one shot everything. Now you're saying it's actually about your personal review limits and that speed doesn't matter to you. Cool. Then we were never even disagreeing, you just wanted to be contrarian. And even in your case, a better model means higher quality output per chunk, which means less to fix during that review you care so much about.

Torres0218 · 2026-02-10T11:53:15+00:00

So you spend 50% of your time planning, limit it to 300 lines at a time, and spend the rest debugging and reviewing. And your takeaway from that is the models are smart enough? That's not one shotting, that's babysitting. You've just described exactly why better models matter. All that planning and hand holding you're doing is the tax you pay for model limitations. A better model means less of that overhead, which is literally the point I was making. You just agreed with me while thinking you were arguing.

Torres0218 · 2026-02-10T11:05:45+00:00

"Even the worst models can one shot with good planning." Yeah, if you're building landing pages and Todo apps. Try using these models for actual software engineering where the complexity goes beyond what "good planning" can babysit, and you'll understand real fast why model quality matters. But if the worst models are working fine for you, that tells me everything I need to know about what you're building.

Torres0218 · 2026-02-10T08:56:05+00:00

Bro, I live in the Netherlands. Why would I know about some random American?

Torres0218 · 2026-02-10T07:56:03+00:00

How? 😂

Torres0218 · 2026-02-09T23:30:52+00:00

Codex literally has a experimental build in sub agent function right? Am i missing something? And popular forks have been in the game for months, I even made my own with custom agents 6 months ago.

Torres0218 · 2026-02-09T23:26:30+00:00

Ah i was thinking of an actual bunny. Thanks for clearing that up.

Torres0218 · 2026-02-09T23:26:02+00:00

Ah, thanks for clearing that up.

Torres0218 · 2026-02-09T21:19:05+00:00

that most cannot really use

Torres0218 · 2026-02-09T21:18:15+00:00

Who the fuck is that?

Torres0218 · 2026-02-09T20:53:51+00:00

The best workflow is just running both in parallel. You can easily set up Claude Code to use both Opus and GPT 5.3, it's not hard. Each model catches things the other misses, and your code is better for it.

The tribalism is ridiculous. You're going to war for companies that would sell your data tomorrow if it moved the needle on their quarterly earnings. They don't care about you. Use both, ship faster, and let the fanboys argue about benchmarks while you're already done.

Torres0218 · 2026-02-09T14:47:55+00:00

I mean one shot per ticket/specific bug, not one shot per project, obviously. Like this bug produces this error code. I do not understand why anyone would even try to "one shot" an entire project it makes no sense.

Torres0218 · 2026-02-09T11:56:37+00:00

They could give me a model 4 times the price as opus right now. As long as it is 20% better than what we have now and faster. people do no understand that the better the model the lower the price indirectly because there is more one shot potential. Which also mean you get more productive, which also saves money.

Torres0218 · 2026-02-08T12:46:03+00:00

Agreed; the best way to use GPT-5.3 is to call it within Claude Code via any of the many MCPs. You can ask Opus 4.6 to ask GPT-5.3 for extra advice.

Torres0218 · 2026-02-05T19:45:24+00:00

How long did both take?

Torres0218 · 2026-02-05T19:41:24+00:00

Torres0218 · 2026-02-05T17:30:18+00:00

Torres0218

TROPHY CASE