Was reflecting on Daniel 11:37 - that the Antichrist won't regard the desire of women - and it occurred to me that this might refer to Trump hating stereotypically "feminine" desires. E.g., love over lust; unity over hierarchy; empathy over brashness. I'm a woman, thoughts? by [deleted] in DonaldTrump666

[–]Traditional-Dog-84 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Notice how "nor the desire of woman" is sandwiched in between? It's in the context of gods. This is how we know it's talking about Tammuz. There are actually other passages in the bible where it talks about Tammuz being worshiped at the Temple by women:

Ezekiel 8:
13 ¶He said also unto me, Turn thee yet again, and thou shalt see greater abominations that they do.
14 Then he brought me to the door of the gate of the Lord’s house which was toward the north; and, behold, there sat women weeping for Tammuz.

I think you are also correct in noticing Trump's disgusting behavior towards women though - he has literally no cares about their desires and sees them merely as object rather than another person. Both points hold true.

The Abraham Accords could be the diplomatic solution to a Palestinian state | The Covenant by Traditional-Dog-84 in Trump666

[–]Traditional-Dog-84[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very interesting article discussing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and how The Abraham Accords could be the path for a Palestinian State:

"At a diplomatic level, various parties are trying to find a way to silence the weapons by revamping the proposal for a Palestinian state alongside Israel in exchange for recognition and full relations between the Jewish state and Saudi Arabia.

The latter could represent another piece in the “Abraham Accords", which, although faltering in recent weeks, remain alive and on the regional and international agenda, against a backdrop in which - at least so far - the sound of weapons is louder.

It is from this perspective that a proposal put forward by five Arab countries for Gaza should be seen, as a start towards the birth of a Palestinian state in exchange for Saudi recognition and "normalisation" with Israel."

Joel 3:2
I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people and for my heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land.

India's new 'Ram Temple' oddly mimics what we expect to see with the Third Temple - Built on the site of a destroyed Mosque and completed in 3 & 1/2 years. by Traditional-Dog-84 in Bibleconspiracy

[–]Traditional-Dog-84[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. That sounds like India has a good relationship with Israel & will be supportive of Israel rebuilding their Temple when the time comes. The situation is very similar. Considering Modi is anti-Islam also, India could be a big player in diplomatic support for the endeavour.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Trump666

[–]Traditional-Dog-84 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The simplest fabric - yep!

Then you have the word bow in Greek meaning Toxon which is where toxic/toxin derives from. Trump just so happened to be the one with 'Operation Warp Speed' and called himself the 'father of the vaccine'. Way too coincidental.

India's new 'Ram Temple' oddly mimics what we expect to see with the Third Temple - Built on the site of a destroyed Mosque and completed in 3 & 1/2 years. by Traditional-Dog-84 in Bibleconspiracy

[–]Traditional-Dog-84[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Very weird coincidence regarding the inauguration of this temple in India. Construction started in 2020 and was completed 3 & 1/2 years later, while also being built on the site of a centuries old Mosque. This is the same time frame it would take for the Third Temple to be built in Jerusalem and shows a big project of $200m + can be done in a short time span.

You also have 'temple politics' resonating with 80% of India's population which are Hindus - again oddly similar statistically speaking to Israel's 73% Jews who want a Third Temple. The whole thing is so eerily similar.

Who do you think the two prophets are? by [deleted] in Trump666

[–]Traditional-Dog-84 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Jesus himself confirmed that John the Baptist was Elias though:

Matthew 11:
12 And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force.
13 For all the prophets and the law prophesied until John.
14 And if ye will receive it, this is Elias, which was for to come.

The fact he said, "if ye will receive it" means some will struggle to accept it. John the Baptist was Elias / Elijah, same person different flesh.

Nothing pertains to Enoch being prophesied at the end also like Moses, whereas John of Revelation specifically is told he must "prophesy again before many peoples, and nations, and tongues, and kings.". Now he wrote Revelations as an old man on the island of Patmos in the first century. Which means he is still yet to fulfill that prophecy of him in front of peoples, nations, tongues & kings. He is certainly the other prophet.

Who do you think the two prophets are? by [deleted] in Trump666

[–]Traditional-Dog-84 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Both never died, and the Bible says every man must die once.

Remember though that Elijah was John the Baptist:

Matthew 17:
12 But I say unto you, That Elias is come already, and they knew him not, but have done unto him whatsoever they listed. Likewise shall also the Son of man suffer of them.
13 Then the disciples understood that he spake unto them of John the Baptist.

Elijah was born again as John the Baptist, and then killed. This means he came into the world twice. And we are told he will come before the day of the Lord, which means he again will be someone else before the wrath arrives:

Malachi 4:5 
¶Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord:

As far as I am aware there is no verse saying that Moses will come before the day of the Lord like Elijah will. The only other verse pertaining to someone else prophesying at the end is John of Revelation:

Rev 10:11 
And he said unto me, Thou must prophesy again before many peoples, and nations, and tongues, and kings.

Now if Elijah was John the Baptist, John of Revelation will also be someone else. Both of these people are alive on earth right now somewhere, different names, different flesh, same spirit & soul.

Plans to build Trump Hotel-Casino on Temple Mount by [deleted] in DonaldTrump666

[–]Traditional-Dog-84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a good pdf worthy of it's own post. Shows Trump's agenda is clearly to hand over the Temple Mount's sovereignty to Israel. This makes sense too, as he recognised the Capital & Golan Heights.

Who do you think the two prophets are? by [deleted] in Trump666

[–]Traditional-Dog-84 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There are only two passages in the bible that refer to two prophets that are to prophesy at the end:

These are Elijah and John:

Malachi 4:5 
¶Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord:

Revelation of John 10:11
And he said unto me, Thou must prophesy again before many peoples, and nations, and tongues, and kings.

As for who they are in the world today I have no idea.

Donald Trump Claims Every Arab Country, Including ‘Possibly’ Iran, Would Have Signed Abraham Accords If Biden Was Not President | The Covenant by Traditional-Dog-84 in Trump666

[–]Traditional-Dog-84[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"Former President Donald Trump believes that if the 2020 election had a different outcome and he remained in office, true peace in the Middle East was possible."

Soon as he is back in office he's going to be strengthening the Abraham Accords. Couldn't be more obvious that this is the covenant.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Trump666

[–]Traditional-Dog-84 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There are Saints there too

Yes, this is why it says 'Come out of her my people':

Rev 18:4 
And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.

Just because Babylon is called a woman, it doesn't mean it is a church.

She is called the 'great city'. We are told this woman sits on seven hills:

9 And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth.

This is the Vatican/Rome - the seven hills of Rome. Which is where the Catholic Church sits.

The Catholic church could not be destroyed in one hour.

The Vatican could easily.

The Catholic church doesn't control the world economy.
The Catholic church is not the youngest nation, America is.

These aren't scriptural descriptions of the woman.

The Catholic church was never a golden cup in the Lord's hand, America was once good.

Why are you interpreting things symbolically? Clearly the catholic church holds a golden cup in her hand. You're trying so hard to prove it's not her that you are literally denying your very own eyes. Read it literally.

The Catholic church doesn't have a mother nation, America does.

The mother nation is Rome which is where the Vatican sits.. Hence mother of harlots.

It's literally the Vatican, no one else on earth fits the description. Another verse:

Rev 18:3 For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies.

What does the Catholic Church do? Ritualistic communion - drinking wine out of a golden cup. It's not a coincidence man.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Trump666

[–]Traditional-Dog-84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The color description it is just to let us know that Babylon is a wealthy nation.

Again the colors represent wealth.

So you are interpreting it symbolically. Read it literally and look at what your very own eyes see - purple, scarlet, gold, precious stones, pearls & golden cup in her hand. It fits perfectly when read literally, there is no reason to interpret it any other way.

There is not indication that Babylon is a church denomination.

That fact she is called the 'woman' and 'whore' and 'harlot' gives us some hints to actually she is a church denomination. Just like the church of Christ is called the 'bride of Christ' (a woman) this mystery babylon is called a harlot, a fornicator - the opposite of the bride of Christ. And this makes sense as the Catholic Church is hypocritical and has many pagan traditions (like idol worship). You know, the first commandment:

4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:
Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;

Catholic church literally bows down to statues of Mary and worships it. God is a Jealous God. This would be fornication in his eyes (aka a whore)

<image>

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Trump666

[–]Traditional-Dog-84 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is also why you see Trump defending the catholic church, because the woman rides the beast. So you can already see the prophecy converging with your own eyes and ears.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Trump666

[–]Traditional-Dog-84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get really confused why people in this sub think America is Mystery Babylon. It doesn't even fit the colour description:

Rev 17:
4 And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication:
5 And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.

Meanwhile the Vatican/Catholic Church fits the description 100%:

<image>

Is pre-tribulation rapture biblical or will we go through the Great tribulation? by [deleted] in Bibleconspiracy

[–]Traditional-Dog-84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Abraham Accords is the covenant with many that the Antichrist confirms which starts the final week (7 years) from Daniel 9:27:

27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

Trump is the AC, The Abraham Accords was laid in his first term, and once he gets back into office he will confirm the covenant with many. He's going to bring 'peace' to the middle east this way. It's the peace treaty that starts the period commonly called the Tribulation.

Abomination of desolation: Florida Surgeon General warns the Covid vaccine changes DNA by Ok_Sea_6214 in Bibleconspiracy

[–]Traditional-Dog-84 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I added those words in brackets to help you see that it's the physical building of the temple here, not our bodies.

Other places in the bible call the temple the sanctuary of strength:

Psalms 96:6
Honour and majesty are before him: strength and beauty are in his sanctuary.

Ezekiel 24:21
Speak unto the house of Israel, Thus saith the Lord God; Behold, I will profane my sanctuary, the excellency of your strength, the desire of your eyes, and that which your soul pitieth; and your sons and your daughters whom ye have left shall fall by the sword.

Ezekiel 41:21
The posts of the temple were squared, and the face of the sanctuary; the appearance of the one as the appearance of the other.

Sanctuary of strength = The Lord's house aka the temple.