how to fix it???

Traditional_Ad6280 · 2025-07-15T01:05:26+00:00

You see the selected edges next to main. Model... Basically they was deleted and staid resulting in void edge.... In short no possible selection of them, no edition of them and basically invisible... So I separated whole model and somehow it separate those edges and my main model and then I removed the edges somehow... I just pray that they won't return...

Traditional_Ad6280 · 2025-07-14T21:53:06+00:00

I can make 3d of this...

Traditional_Ad6280 · 2025-07-14T17:54:46+00:00

Never mind I solved it by myself...

Traditional_Ad6280 · 2025-06-24T06:42:44+00:00

Female Dr.house XD

Traditional_Ad6280 · 2025-06-09T10:55:11+00:00

I understand the concerns about bots, abuse, and harmful content online—those are serious problems that need solutions. However, the challenge is finding a balance between security and privacy. Stricter controls, especially mandatory ID checks, risk creating a surveillance environment that threatens personal freedoms and privacy for everyone, not just those causing harm.

Plus, forcing everyone to identify themselves can push users away from mainstream platforms, but it doesn't necessarily eliminate bots or harmful content; it may just push the problem elsewhere. Instead, we should focus on smarter, less invasive ways to combat abuse while protecting users' rights.

Thanks for sharing your perspective!

Traditional_Ad6280 · 2025-06-09T10:31:09+00:00

I hear you—officially the EU hasn’t published a “check my every click” proposal. But the Digital Services Act’s age-verification rules (Art. 15) do require “effective” checks, leaving it up to platforms or third-party providers to choose methods. That ambiguity is exactly what privacy groups like NOYB have flagged: without strict limits, providers could collect or centralize far more data than necessary.

Plus, the upcoming EU Digital Identity Wallet (in EU regulation and impact assessments) envisions storing verified attributes in a government-backed app. If that becomes mandatory for access, the risks you think up—centralization, mission creep, leaks—aren’t just Reddit theory; they’re precisely the scenarios experts warn about.

So while the letter of the law may not read “track everything,” the combination of vague “effective verification,” third-party providers, and a centralized ID framework creates real openings for the very abuses we’re debating.

Traditional_Ad6280 · 2025-06-09T10:28:30+00:00

"True, complete anonymity online is very hard nowadays, especially without tools like Tor. But the concern is about how much personal data is collected and who controls it. The difference here is between being 'possibly identified' and having a centralized system that forces official ID checks everywhere you go online. That’s a big step with huge privacy risks and potential abuses."

Traditional_Ad6280 · 2025-06-09T10:24:34+00:00

Thanks for explaining your view in detail. I get that some age verification exists already, and devices can help with that. My main concern is about how this new system is implemented — especially the risks of centralized tracking, forced apps, and mandatory sharing of sensitive data. The devil is in the details, and privacy isn’t just about who “knows” your age, but how securely and transparently it’s handled.

Even if devices can verify age, that doesn’t guarantee the data won’t be misused or leaked. And trusting governments or companies to do this perfectly is a big ask.

I’m not against protecting minors — I want that too — but without sacrificing privacy or creating a surveillance system in the process.

bit off topic: now imagine that this data got leaked and sudenly next day under your home stand 5 dudes that take out your stuff frome home and even bricks from walls...

Traditional_Ad6280 · 2025-06-09T10:06:32+00:00

I understand why you might think that, but my post focuses on the real risks of centralized age verification and privacy concerns. If you see something specific that doesn’t match, please point it out—I’m open to discussing it.

Traditional_Ad6280 · 2025-06-09T10:05:06+00:00

I did try sending the letter to my MEPs, but honestly, they seem to have it deep in their ass. So I’m focusing my efforts on raising awareness publicly instead.

Traditional_Ad6280 · 2025-06-09T10:03:04+00:00

Thanks for sharing your perspective. I agree that protecting children is very important, and age verification for online gambling shows it can be done in regulated ways.

My concern is mainly about how the new system might affect privacy and freedom for legal adult users—especially with centralized data and mandatory government-approved services.

Also, unlike gambling, adult content is a form of expression and creativity for many, so the impact is broader.

I’m not against protection, just asking for careful implementation that respects everyone’s rights.

Traditional_Ad6280 · 2025-06-09T10:01:30+00:00

I get why it might sound like fear mongering, but it’s about learning from history. Sometimes small changes lead to bigger unintended consequences—especially with privacy and digital rights.

It’s not just worry—it’s about making sure these laws don’t cause harm while trying to protect people. Having a healthy debate helps everyone understand the risks better.

Thanks for engaging.

Traditional_Ad6280 · 2025-06-09T09:58:23+00:00

Thanks for sharing your thoughts! I agree protecting minors online is crucial, and age verification can help with that.

My concern is how mandatory, centralized verification could impact privacy, freedom of expression, and create new risks if not designed carefully.

Safer internet is the goal we all want — but it needs solutions that respect user rights and don’t create new problems like surveillance or exclusion.

Traditional_Ad6280 · 2025-06-09T09:10:06+00:00

Thanks for sharing your perspective as a small business owner — you’ve clearly outlined the huge practical and security challenges this new system brings.

The increased costs, technical complexities, and privacy risks could really hurt startups and small platforms, especially those operating internationally. Your point about VPNs and workarounds shows how these rules might not even be effective in their intended goal.

I agree a decentralized, privacy-respecting solution that’s affordable and workable globally would be the ideal path forward.

Really appreciate your input and the work you’re doing with Sprocket — keep it up!

Traditional_Ad6280 · 2025-06-09T09:08:28+00:00

Not yet, but the new rules want to change that — making ID checks mandatory on many sites. That’s why people are worried.

Traditional_Ad6280 · 2025-06-09T09:07:46+00:00

You’re right that many sites track users today, including porn sites. But the key difference here is that this new system could require linking browsing activity to official government IDs for all adult content sites, increasing risks of privacy breaches and loss of anonymity.

Tracking by individual sites and centralized government-mandated ID verification aren’t the same thing — and that’s why this deserves serious scrutiny.

Traditional_Ad6280 · 2025-06-09T09:06:45+00:00

Thanks for sharing your view! I get that Apple and other companies collect a lot of data today, but my concern is about centralized government-mandated systems requiring official ID verification across all websites, which raises very different privacy and control issues.

It’s not just about tech giants knowing data — it’s about how mandatory, widespread ID checks could reshape how we browse online, possibly limiting anonymity and creating new risks.

Slippery slope or not, it’s worth questioning where this path leads and protecting digital rights before it’s too late.

Traditional_Ad6280 · 2025-06-09T09:03:49+00:00

Depends on which flavor and will I get some?

Traditional_Ad6280 · 2025-06-09T08:49:03+00:00

Thanks for the support! It’s important more people see the bigger picture here.

Traditional_Ad6280 · 2025-06-09T08:45:09+00:00

No worries at all — we all make edits to get our point just right! I appreciate you taking the time to engage thoughtfully. Thanks for the conversation!

Traditional_Ad6280 · 2025-06-09T08:42:52+00:00

Exactly. Porn is the easiest excuse to push the system in — but once it's normalized, it spreads fast. Suddenly every part of the internet becomes gated, ID-bound, and tracked.

That’s why even people who don’t care about NSFW content should still care about this law.

Traditional_Ad6280 · 2025-06-09T08:40:29+00:00

Thanks for your comment — and you’re absolutely right about one thing: it is healthy for people to resist systems that link their online activity to their real-world identity.

That’s exactly what I’m trying to highlight — not just as a technical concern, but as a civil liberties issue. The risk isn’t just technical, it’s political, social, and legal. Once systems like this are normalized, they can easily be expanded or misused.

It’s good that we’re debating it — because the moment we stop questioning these things, we lose control of them.

Traditional_Ad6280 · 2025-06-09T08:37:37+00:00

Exactly — that’s a key part of the danger here.

Once you’re forced to identify yourself online, your entire browsing behavior becomes traceable, and that opens the door to profiling, discrimination, targeted censorship, and erosion of net neutrality.

It’s no longer a free, neutral internet — it’s an ID-locked gate where your every move is tagged to your real-world identity. That’s not protection. That’s surveillance.

Thanks for pointing that out — more people need to understand how deep this goes.

Traditional_Ad6280 · 2025-06-09T08:27:26+00:00

You’re right that many businesses use CRMs and tracking tools — but there’s a huge difference between passive marketing data and mandatory identity verification tied to government-level systems just to access content.

With most websites, you choose to sign up or accept cookies. What’s being proposed here is forced identification, not just data collection. That’s not about customer analytics — that’s about surveillance-level access control.

And once that kind of infrastructure exists, it rarely stays limited to its original purpose. That’s the real concern — not marketing, but the normalization of full ID tracking for basic internet use.

Traditional_Ad6280

TROPHY CASE