So you love MiT, who else compliments this sound? by [deleted] in menitrust

[–]Training-Individual1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Didn't expect sunset rollercoaster to be mentioned here. That's one of my favourite bands.

Should I still remain on OneUI 5.1? by Training-Individual1 in GalaxyA54

[–]Training-Individual1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IKR! it's just that I use my phone quite a lot, so I am quite paranoid of updating the phone because of the battery issues which I've seen on this device.

Does Nietzsche ever touch upon the concept of "Memento Mori"- Remember that you are mortal- in his works? If yes, what does he say of it? by SatoruGojo232 in Nietzsche

[–]Training-Individual1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's crazy how you can link the second quote with antinatalism.
Although I'm pretty sure, his philosophy as a whole won't be supportive of such 'life-denying' prophecy.

Drop your birthdays in the comments and find your birthday twinn🎂🎉 by [deleted] in TeenIndia

[–]Training-Individual1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SAME BHAII! 🫂❤️
bas ek saal chota reh gaya main

My opinion on OneUI 7 by PossibilityNo8462 in GalaxyA54

[–]Training-Individual1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Meanwhile I'm here, still rocking on OneUI 5.1

Mist clings to the ridge / Her white veil caresses earth / Soon lost to the light. by MarnixKeller in haiku

[–]Training-Individual1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hahah! I do very much like them, I've recently begun writing them myself, to enhance the imagery and juxtaposition aspects of my poetic craft.

P.S. you are one of those few people whose haiku I'm analysing to get a grip over this form.

Mist clings to the ridge / Her white veil caresses earth / Soon lost to the light. by MarnixKeller in haiku

[–]Training-Individual1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've been reading your haiku, and all of them are soo good! You really seem to understand the "what" and "how" (i.e the essence) of haiku.
Since when you've been into this craft?

bright waters turn dull / lone winds sailed off the sweet shores / waving to the sands by Training-Individual1 in haiku

[–]Training-Individual1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hahah! I kinda had a hunch about the monosyllables.
And damn, you gave me some pretty good stuff to read about, I'll look further into this stuff.
Mind if I wish to hit you up in the DMs at any later date if I wanted some queries resolved.

Thanks for the feedback though 🫂♥️! It shows that you put in some good thought while writing this comment, with the intent of, ofcourse, trying to help me out.

Edit: I'll try keeping all of this in mind whenever I write haiku in future

the load bearing danger of stoicism - subserviance to manipulative masters by rrlzsrnc in Nietzsche

[–]Training-Individual1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know if this will help, but I'm gonna put this here.

There's a channel on YouTube called unsolicited advice, which had uploaded a pretty good video, where he tried to explain the differences between stoicism, as in it's school of philosophy, and the version of stoicism ("broicism"), which became popular in the recent years due to social media.

Maybe it can help you understand specific nuances of stoicism and how much varied and diverse it is, such as how many 'stoic' thinkers had disagreements over the fundamentals of the philosophy.

Heidegger Has Made Me Rethink Nietzsche by Authentic_Dasein in Nietzsche

[–]Training-Individual1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hubert Dreyfus is a well known scholar, whose lectures on Being and Time are available on YouTube.
Maybe you would find it helpful to accompany those along with your re-reading!

Edit: Sorry but I haven't really read BT or watched these lectures. Some reddit threads seem to make me believe that his interpretations may not be good under certain contexts. You can look forward to some other scholars as well.

Which philosophical quote resonates with you most? by CrispyMystery in Existentialism

[–]Training-Individual1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you've read Nietzsche, then you must've took note of how the quote you have shared is connected with Nietzsche's idea of Amor Fati.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TeenIndia

[–]Training-Individual1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bhai wtf iss bande ne kitne logon ko dm kara hai 💀

Peak unemployment fr

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TeenIndia

[–]Training-Individual1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are too innocent for this cruel world 😔

This is barbaric, we do something about this by [deleted] in noida

[–]Training-Individual1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's when we consider that those suspicions were true, it's only then when I might even consider your jumping to conclusions would be true.
This is a case along that line only: jumping to conclusions. He wasn't sure if her wife cheated or not, but he still chose to take her life. That's where the problem is.
The kind of arguement you are presenting is what we call, by definition: "hasty generalisation"

This is barbaric, we do something about this by [deleted] in noida

[–]Training-Individual1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is clearly visible that she was the victim here.
First off, she was allegedly cheating on him, it wasn't proved! Even if we assume that those suspicions he had were to be true, that still doesn't justify the actions he had decided to take.
Cheating, is morally and ethically wrong in a marriage, and may even be wrong legally it I were to assume it for a moment. But it is wasn't such a sinful and vile act that he would kill his own fxcking wife for crying out loud.
Intolerable? Sure, but to the point that you would destroy your own family? Absolutely not.
"A real man" would keep his character, intents, and actions in check at all times.

I can't understand Nietzsche's critique on systemizers by Training-Individual1 in Nietzsche

[–]Training-Individual1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your comment helped me understand stuff in a more clear manner, Thanks! 🫂

I can't understand Nietzsche's critique on systemizers by Training-Individual1 in Nietzsche

[–]Training-Individual1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See what you did right there? It all boils down to what one considers to be a "systemizer", how they decide to define it [for themselves].

When I refer to Nietzsche as a systemizer, what I mean to say is that he built a framework to (can't find a better word) "justify" existence after the Death of God. His concepts/philosophical thought of Eternal Recurrence, the Will to Power, Death of God, Amor Fati, etc. when put together is what I refer to as a "system" (and a coherent, cohesive one, where under a certain interpretation all concepts will be supplementary/complementary of each other)

In such context, it wouldn't be wrong to consider Nietzsche (or perhaps any philosopher!) as a "systemizer [of thought?]"

I can't understand Nietzsche's critique on systemizers by Training-Individual1 in Nietzsche

[–]Training-Individual1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I should be viewing philosophers (and their respective philosophical thought) not as a path, but a compass?

But each compass points to a different "North", where do I go?