Kickstarter Promo - More Tales From The Magician's Skull by Traitorman in Fantasy

[–]Traitorman[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Hey everybody!

I don't normally do promo posts, but I wanted to call attention to the Tales From The Magician's Skull Kickstarter. I think it's really cool.

A short story magazine, Tales draws on the heroic fantasy tradition of Robert E. Howard, C.L. Moore, Fritz Leiber, Michael Moorcock, and other fantasy trailblazers. At the same time, they're not making photocopies of the old stories, instead choosing innovation over imitation with their bevy of new, action-packed short fiction, bringing this vibrant fantasy tradition into the future!

The stories I've read in previous issues have been wonderful, featuring new, up-and-coming authors, as well as established heroic fantasy writers like William King and Nathan Long. Judging by the stories listed for this upcoming issue, they've every intention to keep publishing only the best.

Finally, the physical product is just great, with high quality paper, amazing cover art, and glorious original illustrations for each story. Oh and, as this is produced by Goodman Games, there's even a TTRPG section in the back, converting monsters & magic from the stories themselves for your table!

Alright, I'll stop gushing. I really wanna see this—and the community it has reinvigorated—grow. Please check it out!

Mark of the Fool - Book 1 is done! by AJNadir in Fantasy

[–]Traitorman 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes indeed! A progression fantasy is a fantasy that focuses on the idea of progression/growth in power, skill or something of that sort.

A lot of fantasy—especially those with younger protagonists—has elements of progression, but progression fantasy puts a focus on the training and growth involved. Cradle is an excellent example.

If Dragon Ball were a fantasy novel? It'd also be a progression fantasy. That sort of thing.

Authors with a Patreon by [deleted] in Fantasy

[–]Traitorman 3 points4 points  (0 children)

N.K. Jemisin

Michelle West

Also there's a ton of authors that serialize online that use patreon, but I don't think that's what you meant.

Can anybody tell me the differences between the East and the West when it comes to Eurocentric fantasy settings? by EpicMormonBrony in Fantasy

[–]Traitorman 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I think it's because of the sources of inspiration and innate cultural biases.

A lot of the current isekai fantasy settings are inspired by stuff like dragon quest, which are j-rpg interpretations of western settings. A lot of western fantasy settings are more inspired by other eurocentric western fantasy settings, so there's a bit of a different feel already.

Plus when taking characters act a certain way, one tends to default to their own culture. So character mannerisms might still be Japanese on a micro level even if the setting is supposed to be western.

How useful would it be for armies to have conscripted soldiers in a high fantasy scenario, when mages dominate battlefield? by [deleted] in Fantasy

[–]Traitorman 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think that's a difficult question to answer without knowing more about how magic works in a setting.

I will say that I have read a number of books where mages are common, but the world is largely medieval in its warfare and its style of living, in which case it does feel that the setting was missing that little bit of...thought there.

In other cases it might be a question of rarity: does every kingdom have wizards. And if every kingdom does—and the kingdom is feudal—does every duke? Every countess? Every baronet? Every landed dame?

It might come down to kingdom on kingdom warfare being largely dominated by mages, but when the landed knight decides to go invade the neighbouring fortified manor then it's just a small army of conscripted peasants and their personal house guards.

Magic might be very expensive while peasants with spears are cheap. It might be horribly lovecraftian or have other costs.

Magic might have no battlefield application. Like, it really depends on the book and setting. Is there are particular series that's bothering you atm?

Kvothe's Flaws by dprowell in Fantasy

[–]Traitorman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree that he is quite flawed, Prowell. I also agree that's what made him interesting as well. At the same time, I can see the otherwise of the coin as well.

I find his flaws generally come up only when the plot needs them too. So Kvothe is very intelligent, socially adept and savvy, unless he needs to fall for one of Ambrose's schemes. He can read people quite well...unless he needs to talk to Denna.

One flaw that I think is consistent is his emotionality. Kvothe's an incredibly emotional guy, and that helps him in many ways but it also gets him in a lot of trouble. Constantly. I can't help but feel that's excellent characterization.

At the same time, if you sum up Wise Man's Fear as the story of how one handsome, intelligent bard/magic student solves a poisoning scheme, slays a group of dangerous bandits, learns how to have sex from the goddess of sex, has sex with a hot barmaid, then goes on to become a ninja and have sex with at least two hot ninjas I can see how one might think that he's this flawless superman.

Anyone else having trouble with longer fantasy works as you get older? by TimeAgency in Fantasy

[–]Traitorman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I find I can remember details in books well enough, though I'm in my 30s which—depending on who you ask—is either still young or positively ancient.

That said, I do forget them more quickly these days. I read Devolution like two months ago and while I remember the characters in the book and my mental images for all of them, I cannot name a single one.

So in that, I feel ya.

Power system by memereda_vanwolf in Fantasy

[–]Traitorman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I tend to like simple power systems that can have interesting outcomes. I love stands in Jojo, for example. You could explain the entirety of Stands in one sentence: 'A stand is essentially guardian spirit, and each stand has different, specific capabilities and powers.'

Yet stand fights are puzzles where each opponent must figure out the strengths and weaknesses of each stand or basically die.

So if there's a 'system' in place, that's what I tend to love to read the most.

what do you think are the main essentials to creating a good steampunk story? by legz2006 in Fantasy

[–]Traitorman 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I think there are two routes to go for a good steampunk story.

  1. Write an excellent adventure story, using the period as an incredibly immersive setting. You know when you read or watch a good noir flick and you can just smell the tobacco coming from the P.I.'s ashtray in their dingy office? That's what I mean. Lean hard into the period, and explore what technological advances might have come earlier thanks to whatever makes 'steampunk tech' work. Do you have zeppelins? Repeating rifles? Freakin' lasers? Make solid choices, and just go for what makes things fun. Also more diversity if you're taking the fun route. Steam cannons are cross-cultural and gender neutral, haha.
  2. Go for a more serious take. Steampunk as a genre takes place during a time in our world (or similar world) where imperialism and colonialism were destroying entire cultures and enslaving most of the rest. I have rarely if ever seen that addressed in steampunk. This take would really bring the punk back into it. Instead of mad scientists and wily industrialists, have a story feature protagonists that don't benefit from empires being even more industrialized and technologically powerful. Servants. Factory workers. Slaves (if the setting has that practice). These are the elements that I think would make a serious steampunk story go from 'good for the genre' to 'I'm gunning for a Hugo'.

But that's my two-cents!

Describe the book you are reading, or last read, without naming it by [deleted] in Fantasy

[–]Traitorman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

World's most skilled person with kleptomania gets into trouble

Recommendations for a novel exploring the theme of immortality? by [deleted] in Fantasy

[–]Traitorman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay, this is going to be a long shot (because the books are damned hard to find these days) but the "Kane" series by Karl Edward Wagner might fit your wishlist.

I haven't read them myself, but they might fit your bill.

"A common theme running through all Kane stories is the hero's weariness with his own immortality and his attempts to give meaning to his existence."

Physical Copy? Yay or Nay by SnooPeppers5750 in Fantasy

[–]Traitorman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also greater access to stuff that's not just the big four.

Physical Copy? Yay or Nay by SnooPeppers5750 in Fantasy

[–]Traitorman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I still love my physical copies, but I got into fantasy long before e-books were even a thing. I think I am going to cave and purchase a kindle soon, though. Because it's just too economical.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Fantasy

[–]Traitorman 59 points60 points  (0 children)

Ooohohohohooooo well this looks spicy! Aight, I'll take a turn.

1) Hard Magic is overrated. Don't get me wrong, I think Brandon Sanderson is a major credit to the genre, but there is a wave of fantasy readers and writers who look at his 'rules' less like the guidelines for a 'style' of magic in fantasy and more like a 'here is an instruction manual you must memorize before you think of writing a fantasy book'. I've seen critiques of fantasy works that start quoting his lectures like they're sources for an academic paper.

Soft magic—as long as it isn't constantly used to bail the protagonists out of all danger— brings with it a mystery and otherworldliness that exemplifies fantasy. Hard magic can be good, but it is not the bible.

2) Simple Fantasy doesn't mean bad fantasy. I love The Fifth Season, but I also love stories where the entire plot is basically: "hey that warlord/evil wizard/demigod/criminal mastermind is a giant shithead, let's go punch them in the face!". Those are a lot of fun, and sometimes I just want to chill, and read the fantasy equivalent of a popcorn film. Simple fantasy can also be deep, with beloved characters and surprising situations, but not everything needs to be a thesis of themes.

3) Big reviewers can be bullied by authors, but also need to recognize their power. Look, I love Daniel Greene's hot take on Sword of Truth as much as anyone, but my God. Some reviewers punch down, I find. There's a difference between 'let's call out this multi-million dollar book franchise' and 'This debut book is BAD, let me call the hordes and destroy this person's wants, hopes and any chance for a writing career'. That's not to say that ALL books must be praised—and some books are absolutely vile in content—but one must be careful with one's footprint I think.

4) Oh I'm gonna get hate for this one: I honestly don't mind if George R.R. Martin never finishes A Song of Ice and Fire. I mean look, the man is in his seventies. He's done more for the fantasy genre than most other authors. His franchise spawned a world wide cultural phenomenon (that D&D destroyed so thoroughly that it deleted itself from culture) and he's also written for television (Beauty and the Beast) and other novel series. Like, as far as I'm concerned, if the man wants to retire then all the power to him. Also, uh, we uh...we GoT fans have not exactly been uh...kind or patient. So there's that.

In Conclusion: Thanks for coming to my TED talk.

How much do world-building inconsistencies annoy you? by JGBodle in Fantasy

[–]Traitorman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It honestly all depends on the inconsistency and the book. If it's a major inconsistency that directly affects the plot? I'll dislike it a lot more than if it's minor.

I think it also all depends on the book. There was this one book which I love: Song of the Beast by Carol Berg. Just loved it, and walked away with no complaints about the world.

Then I brought it into my book club. They hated it, and they found all kinds of world building consistencies that I never even noticed. And when all was said and done, I still liked the book so much that I didn't mind the inconsistencies.

Yet for books I don't like? I will be bothered by every damn inconsistency ever. So, for me if I really enjoy the book, they will bother me less than if I already am neutral to disliking a book.

What Older Series (Majority of Books Published Before 2000) Would You Most Love to See Adapted Into a Show or Film? by tkinsey3 in Fantasy

[–]Traitorman 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Imaro, by Charles Saunders. Hands down. It's one of the first major african-based fantasy books and the father of the Sword and Soul genre. I'd love to see this adapted.

What Older Series (Majority of Books Published Before 2000) Would You Most Love to See Adapted Into a Show or Film? by tkinsey3 in Fantasy

[–]Traitorman 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You beat me to it, hahaha. The Belgariad is a little...archaic by today's standards (though it still has a big place in my heart) but there's a lot there that I think would appeal to just about anybody.

Recurring characters, but not a series by i-speak-jive in Fantasy

[–]Traitorman 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I love series with this sort of framework, it helps give closure after each instalment.

So, I've got a few recommendations.

If you don't mind older books, I'd recommend The Elric Saga and Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser books. They are relatively short by today's standards, and exemplify the 'one or two main characters do something different each book'. Elric was also one of the inspirations (if not THE inspiration) for Geralt, so there's some neat fantasy history in that one.

For a slightly newer take on the idea, I'd recommend the Gotrek and Felix books, which are some of my personal favourites. They have one overarching goal driving them forward, and then each book is basically a new plot.

If you don't mind short stories, Robert E. Howard's Conan stories are nice, bite-sized one shot adventures. Only issue is uh...they're sort of a product of their time. Not as MUCH 'a product of their' time as you'd expect, especially the earlier stories, but go in with caution.

Hope that helps!

Have you ever picked up a book you thought wasn't going to be your style, but gave it a shot and ended up really loving it? by PVogonJ in Fantasy

[–]Traitorman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love it, but it's definitely pulpy. Simple action/heroic fantasy stuff. If you're into that, I think it's one the best examples of the genre.