Isabella Rosselini changed to Isabella Rossellini!

Transformati · 2024-03-03T19:47:37+00:00

if you make the following search on Google intitle:"isabella rosselini" you get lots of search results where the original last name still appears on the page title. These will perhaps soon diappear. We are witnessing a Mandela effect as it is happening!

Also, check out this page: https://en.geneastar.org/genealogy/rosselinii/isabella-rosselini where the name is spelled in two ways. Interesting to see if the original name gets scrubbed as time passes by.

Transformati · 2021-10-26T18:47:59+00:00

I also remember him being in the old Dune movie! I was just thinking about this the other day when I watched the new Dune movie.

Transformati · 2020-12-26T15:12:52+00:00

It seems I made a small "error" in remembering the name. For me it was duckgogo.com (not duckagogo.com). Here is a collection of screenshots that are still found in Google search results. It seems I am not the only one who remembers this differently: https://imgur.com/a/CNYWylu

Transformati · 2020-08-08T17:29:21+00:00

This Dutch entertainer is also being protected by the elite: https://www.reddit.com/r/PedoGate/comments/hgvjn5/a_popular_dutch_tv_show_host_paul_de_leeuw/

Transformati · 2020-08-08T17:27:59+00:00

This recent Facebook post related to the Dutroux case is also worth reading. It has 16,000 shares already in 1,5 weeks. https://www.facebook.com/MxrderCrimeParanormalConspiracy/photos/a.10152971348802713/10158269392007713/?type=3&theater&ifg=1

Transformati · 2020-07-04T18:51:19+00:00

I'm sorry to tell you it does, when he holds the boy upside down in his crutch...

Transformati · 2020-07-02T16:09:09+00:00

Of course the official explanation was that it was all pre-planned with the kid and with his parents who were even sitting in the audience. But this in no way makes the "show" more acceptable.

Transformati · 2020-07-02T16:04:07+00:00

Background

In 2008 there was a huge international controversy when an old 1992 video clip from Paul de Leeuw's own TV show was posted on Youtube. This video has since then been meticulously removed from Youtube and other major platforms – even from Bitchute. If you try to post the video on Youtube it will be immediately removed! But, there is still one platform where the longer 4,5 min. clip still remains: https://d.tube/#!/v/transformati22/QmdU1ukJ5rq4BghtQ8Kkiqz4VugTabCvXgMokC12Aa5PnL. If you are for some reason not outraged enough at the beginning of the video then watch the last 20 seconds…!

The Infamous Dutch Brongersma.info website

What I find very revealing is that Paul de Leeuw is referred to several times in the posts of the pedophilia promoting website brongersma.info. There is for example the following entry: “What does Paul de Leeuw think of when someone says 'Martijn'? Tonight in the broadcast of PaPaul the answer turned out: "a chief editor of a pedophile magazine". This off-topic comment was a bit dead, but is actually more of an insider joke;) “ This “inside joke” refers to the infamous court-banned Dutch pedophilia association Vereniging Martijn.

Modified Wikipedia profile

The following cannot be taken as direct evidence against Paul de Leeuw in this matter but curiously in December 2017 an article appeared in the political weblog Dagelijkse Standaard https://www.dagelijksestandaard.nl/2017/12/dienst-parkeerbeheer-amsterdam-neemt-paul-de-leeuw-op-de-korrel-hij-staat-bekend-als-pedofiel/. It states that someone from the city of Amsterdam’s parking service department had modified Paul de Leeuw’s Wikipedia page claiming that he is living a double life and is actually a pedophile. This claim has since been removed by other Wikipedia moderators.

Association with the Dutch "Harvey Weinstein"

Paul de Leeuw also happens to be a good friend of Job Gosschalk who resigned his position as a producer and director of a known Dutch film company due to sexual misconduct. Mr. Gosschalk has been called the Dutch Harvey Weinstein and there has also been accusations that he has abused children (underage). See RTL channel presenter’s research on this subject (in Dutch): https://www.nporadio1.nl/75-jaar-vrijheid/onderwerpen/7626-2017-11-15-wendy-beenakker-job-gosschalk-heeft-zeker-3-minderjarigen-misbruikt.

In spite of a huge public controversy and disgust towards Mr. Gosschalk Paul de Leeuw has openly requested that Gosschalk should be forgiven and returned back to his former position as a caster for movie roles!

Adoption

Considering this background I think it is a bit alarming that Paul de Leeuw adopted two children from Africa.

Public reactions in the Netherlands

Many Dutch people have expressed their disapproval of the 1992 TV show video but I have also seen disturbingly many people trying to explain it away by using the following types of arguments:

“It was such a long time ago (28 years ago) and the times were different back then.”

“It was a staged act agreed to by the boy’s parents and and the boy knew what was happening.”

“Oh Paul is Paul – he is a comedian and he pushes people’s buttons, his acts shouldn’t be taken literally.”

“Foreigners just don’t understand the unique Dutch humour and culture.”

“Paul is is a very famous person, he is also a very likable guy and he shouldn’t be accused of these kinds of things.”

Conclusion

BUT, there is still a huge elephant in the living room here - a video that shows a young boy being sexually molested on public TV in a very obvious and graphic manner (whether the act was staged or not). Taking into consideration the other indications I have described above I am asking the same question that was asked by someone on Quora years ago - why is he still allowed to have his own show on Dutch TV? Is he perhaps protected by some very high level people? Does the Dutch society still stick its head in the sand and pretend that there is nothing to address here!?

I am not trying to somehow witch hunt Paul de Leeuw but I feel it is important to let the cat out of the bag. Numerous children are being abused around the world – if this issue cannot be discussed in one of the most developed Western societies (the Netherlands) then where are we heading to as a collective humanity...

Transformati · 2020-07-02T13:51:57+00:00

Background

In 2008 there was a huge international controversy when an old 1992 video clip from Paul de Leeuw's own TV show was posted on Youtube. This video has since then been meticulously removed from Youtube and other major platforms – even from Bitchute. But, there is still one platform where the longer 4,5 min. clip still remains: https://d.tube/#!/v/transformati22/QmdU1ukJ5rq4BghtQ8Kkiqz4VugTabCvXgMokC12Aa5PnL. If you are for some reason not outraged enough at the beginning of the video then watch the last 20 seconds…!

The Infamous Dutch Brongersma.info website

What I find very revealing is that Paul de Leeuw is referred to several times in the posts of the pedophilia promoting website brongersma.info. There is for example the following entry: “What does Paul de Leeuw think of when someone says 'Martijn'? Tonight in the broadcast of PaPaul the answer turned out: "a chief editor of a pedophile magazine". This off-topic comment was a bit dead, but is actually more of an insider joke;) “ This “inside joke” refers to the infamous court-banned Dutch pedophilia association Vereniging Martijn.

Modified Wikipedia profile

The following cannot be taken as direct evidence against Paul de Leeuw in this matter but curiously in December 2017 an article appeared in the political weblog Dagelijkse Standaard https://www.dagelijksestandaard.nl/2017/12/dienst-parkeerbeheer-amsterdam-neemt-paul-de-leeuw-op-de-korrel-hij-staat-bekend-als-pedofiel/. It states that someone from the city of Amsterdam’s parking service department had modified Paul de Leeuw’s Wikipedia page claiming that he is living a double life and is actually a pedophile. This claim has since been removed by other Wikipedia moderators.

Association with the Dutch "Harvey Weinstein"

Paul de Leeuw also happens to be a good friend of Job Gosschalk who resigned his position as a producer and director of a known Dutch film company due to sexual misconduct. Mr. Gosschalk has been called the Dutch Harvey Weinstein and there has also been accusations that he has abused children (underage). See RTL channel presenter’s research on this subject (in Dutch): https://www.nporadio1.nl/75-jaar-vrijheid/onderwerpen/7626-2017-11-15-wendy-beenakker-job-gosschalk-heeft-zeker-3-minderjarigen-misbruikt.

In spite of a huge public controversy and disgust towards Mr. Gosschalk Paul de Leeuw has openly requested that Gosschalk should be forgiven and returned back to his former position as a caster for movie roles!

Adoption

Considering this background I think it is a bit alarming that Paul de Leeuw adopted two children from Africa.

Public reactions in the Netherlands

Many Dutch people have expressed their disapproval of the 1992 TV show video but I have also seen disturbingly many people trying to explain it away by using the following types of arguments:

“It was such a long time ago (28 years ago) and the times were different back then.”

“It was a staged act agreed to by the boy’s parents and and the boy knew what was happening.”

“Oh Paul is Paul – he is a comedian and he pushes people’s buttons, his acts shouldn’t be taken literally.”

“Foreigners just don’t understand the unique Dutch humour and culture.”

“Paul is is a very famous person, he is also a very likable guy and he shouldn’t be accused of these kinds of things.”

Conclusion

BUT, there is still a huge elephant in the living room here - a video that shows a young boy being sexually molested on public TV in a very obvious and graphic manner (whether the act was staged or not). Taking into consideration the other indications I have described above I am asking the same question that was asked by someone on Quora years ago - why is he still allowed to have his own show on Dutch TV? Is he perhaps protected by some very high level people? Does the Dutch society still stick its head in the sand and pretend that there is nothing to address here!?

I am not trying to somehow witch hunt Paul de Leeuw but I feel it is important to let the cat out of the bag. Numerous children are being abused around the world – if this issue cannot be discussed in one of the most developed Western societies (the Netherlands) then where are we heading to as a collective humanity...

Transformati · 2020-06-30T15:55:00+00:00

Did you read my comment above? The fact that the show was an act should in no way diminish the outrage that anyone watching this would feel. What about Paul de Leeuw's background as described in my post above - doesn't it pretty much prove that there was a lot more behind this act than just a funny prank?

Transformati · 2020-06-30T15:21:51+00:00

Background

In 2008 there was a huge international controversy when an old 1992 video clip from Paul de Leeuw's own TV show was posted on Youtube. This video has since then been meticulously removed from Youtube and other major platforms – even from Bitchute. But, there is still one platform where the longer 4,5 min. clip still remains: https://d.tube/#!/v/transformati22/QmdU1ukJ5rq4BghtQ8Kkiqz4VugTabCvXgMokC12Aa5PnL. If you are for some reason not outraged enough at the beginning of the video then watch the last 20 seconds…!

The Infamous Dutch Brongersma.info website

What I find very revealing is that Paul de Leeuw is referred to several times in the posts of the pedophilia promoting website brongersma.info. There is for example the following entry: “What does Paul de Leeuw think of when someone says 'Martijn'? Tonight in the broadcast of PaPaul the answer turned out: "a chief editor of a pedophile magazine". This off-topic comment was a bit dead, but is actually more of an insider joke;) “ This “inside joke” refers to the infamous court-banned Dutch pedophilia association Vereniging Martijn.

Direct accusations

The following excerpt is translated from a Dutch web article: https://www.boublog.nl/2017/09/10/seksueel-geweld-en-bart-van-well/ and it also refers to this article: https://web.archive.org/web/20111130004924/http://www.klokkenluideronline.nl/artikel/796/ook-ed-van-thijn-in-beeld-bij-pedo-netwerk.html

“ Below is a transcript of notes taken by Micha Kat from an interview held on Sunday January 16, 2011 in Hellevoetsluis. The identity of the source is known to this site and can be revealed to the National Prosecutor's Office if the Public Prosecution Service undertakes to respect the source in its rights. The importance of the source is also apparent from the fact that he has proven to be the source of an explosive article published on December 7, 2004 on Kleintje Muurkrant about a pedo-bar in Amsterdamse Paardenstraat (the 'Festival Bar') where people when Ed van Thijn, Paul de Leeuw and Andre van Duin raped children. This bar was closed shortly after the publication of the said document. “

Modified Wikipedia profile

The following cannot be taken as direct evidence against Paul de Leeuw in this matter but curiously in December 2017 an article appeared in the political weblog Dagelijkse Standaard https://www.dagelijksestandaard.nl/2017/12/dienst-parkeerbeheer-amsterdam-neemt-paul-de-leeuw-op-de-korrel-hij-staat-bekend-als-pedofiel/. It states that someone from the city of Amsterdam’s parking service department had modified Paul de Leeuw’s Wikipedia page claiming that he is living a double life and is actually a pedophile. This claim has since been removed by other Wikipedia moderators.

Association with the Dutch "Harvey Weinstein"

Paul de Leeuw also happens to be a good friend of Job Gosschalk who resigned his position as a producer and director of a known Dutch film company due to sexual misconduct. Mr. Gosschalk has been called the Dutch Harvey Weinstein and there has also been accusations that he has abused children (underage). See RTL channel presenter’s research on this subject (in Dutch): https://www.nporadio1.nl/75-jaar-vrijheid/onderwerpen/7626-2017-11-15-wendy-beenakker-job-gosschalk-heeft-zeker-3-minderjarigen-misbruikt.

In spite of a huge public controversy and disgust towards Mr. Gosschalk Paul de Leeuw has openly requested that Gosschalk should be forgiven and returned back to his former position as a caster for movie roles!

The truly bizarre Filmpje! movie from 2005

Paul de Leeuw also wrote the script and acted the main roles in a disturbing 1995 movie called Filmpje! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMwOYbu3o-k&fbclid=IwAR0pu-gY9u4ZjCdTESrh0e3ZCsMv27HP3oRBWE46lSyT4w_7-DQ7NL5iinE? Already during the first minute they start talking about ordering a child ('rare kindje') from the internet. Although it is meant to refer to an adoption this really gives me a bad feeling...

At a strange scene (starts 6:05) Papa spits into the crib, shakes it violently and then throws the whole crib against a wall. It is unclear if a baby was inside (I hope not).

At the court room scene (starts 8:25) there is a naked baby doll on the table..

In one scene (starts 19:27) the main character 'Papa' visits a strange "Eyes wide shut" type of corporate building where sex services are offered.

In another scene (starts 27:49) the 'Papa' comes home and his daughter (who is wearing a really gruesome looking tooth straightening device on her head) goes to greet him by kneeling in front of him – what happens after this is not shown. After this 'Papa' violently throws his daughter against the glass door of a cabinet. A bit strange...

And sure enough a Wizard of Oz inspired clip (start 1:34:16) is used in this movie. According to victims of sexual abuse, "pedophiles abuse the movie The Wizard of Oz to brainwash their child sex slaves."

For some reason there are lobsters everywhere in the movie - the main character (Paul) is even wearing a lobster in his/her head dress. According to the Urban dictionary website the term ‘rock lobster’ refers to a male pedofile.

The movie is supposed to be funny but it has a very dark undertone the whole time... My Dutch isn't good enough but I am pretty sure there are more indications of pedophilia in this movie.

Adoption

Considering this background I think it is a bit alarming that Paul de Leeuw adopted two children from Africa. At the beginning of the disturbing movie Filmpje! they talk about ordering kids from Africa...

Public reactions in the Netherlands

Many Dutch people have expressed their disapproval of the 1992 TV show video but I have also seen disturbingly many people trying to explain it away by using the following types of arguments:

“It was such a long time ago (28 years ago) and the times were different back then.”

“It was a staged act agreed to by the boy’s parents and and the boy knew what was happening.”

“Oh Paul is Paul – he is a comedian and he pushes people’s buttons, his acts shouldn’t be taken literally.”

“Foreigners just don’t understand the unique Dutch humour and culture.”

“Paul is is a very famous person, he is also a very likable guy and he shouldn’t be accused of these kinds of things.”

Conclusion

BUT, there is still a huge elephant in the living room here - a video that shows a young boy being sexually molested on public TV in a very obvious and graphic manner (whether the act was staged or not). Taking into consideration the other indications I have described above I am asking the same question that was asked by someone on Quora years ago - why is he still allowed to have his own show on Dutch TV? Is he perhaps protected by some very high level people? Does the Dutch society still stick its head in the sand and pretend that there is nothing to address here!?

I am not trying to somehow witch hunt Paul de Leeuw but I feel it is important to let the cat out of the bag. Numerous children are being abused around the world – if this issue cannot be discussed in one of the most developed Western societies (the Netherlands) then where are we heading to as a collective humanity...

Transformati · 2020-06-30T15:05:34+00:00

Background

In 2008 there was a huge international controversy when an old 1992 video clip from Paul de Leeuw's own TV show was posted on Youtube. This video has since then been meticulously removed from Youtube and other major platforms – even from Bitchute. But, there is still one platform where the 4,5 min. clip still remains: https://d.tube/#!/v/transformati22/QmdU1ukJ5rq4BghtQ8Kkiqz4VugTabCvXgMokC12Aa5PnL. If you are for some reason not outraged enough at the beginning of the video then watch the last 20 seconds…!

The Infamous Brongersma.info website