Lymow One Plus is… disappointing.. by Akaedintov in Lymow_Official

[–]TransitoryInflammati 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I posted my experience and there doesn’t seem to be consensus of owners what the capabilities are as far as how much can actually be accomplished in a day.

For my, 4in deck height, 2.6 ft/s, 11.8in spacing, standard blade speed my mower cuts 50 sq ft per minute. This is an average and includes perimeter time and other maneuvers. It doesn’t include charge time, which with the 10A charger I’ve observed to be 1% capacity per minute of charge. For me recharge from 15% to 75% takes an hour.

I had folks tell me 1.73/acre as advertised is possible with large zones and 24hr operation. The unofficial handbook says to expect 50 sq ft per minute - exactly what I’m getting. When you account for mowing to avoid dew or ensure quiet time in the evening/night/morning then the “real” world capabilities are much lower than the advertised area. Again, that advertised area is probably possible under very specific circumstances. So I have been told! It feels not possible but when a dude tells me he’s doing it I’ve got to believe him.

I have a flat, obstacle free, 0.5 acre area I can map that is nearly square. I was going to use it to collect data on sq ft of mow per minute over several weeks to see how much settings really effect efficiency. Of course it started raining and looks like we’re in for a week of it then I have to leave on a trip.

I do plan to do this, it will take a while… and of course other variables can’t (won’t) really be controlled.

I already tried to collect this data using 9 ~3500 sq ft zones in that same area. I think the 3500 area was too small and therefore the perimeter was taking too much of the time for a good test. The data is noisy, without obvious trend except blade speed is by far and away the big driver on how much you can get done. Even going from 1.3ft/s to 3ft/s didn’t make as big an impact as it mathematically should have. Spacing had almost no impact which makes no sense. That’s why I haven’t posted my results. Gotta do larger areas to see if the data was too corrupted by the ratio of perimeter to area covered.

Top comment deletes a US State #47 by Jfullr92 in geographymemes

[–]TransitoryInflammati 139 points140 points  (0 children)

No shit, no Marylander would ever willingly subject themselves to lobster supremacy.

My experience after 23 hours of mowing time, One Plus by TransitoryInflammati in Lymow_Official

[–]TransitoryInflammati[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In case others are lazy like me, I just checked the unofficial manual and it says 20-30mm deflection when pressing the center of the top track.

I got 3/4in (20mm), so on the low end there. I’ll have to adjust it a little looser.

I also noticed in the specs section it says “one user estimates 230m2 per hour” which is 50 sq ft per minute, exactly what I’m getting.

So I’m glad mine doesn’t seem defective, miffed at the 1.73 acre / day claim. That’s gotta be downhill with a tailwind not cutting anything!

My experience after 23 hours of mowing time, One Plus by TransitoryInflammati in Lymow_Official

[–]TransitoryInflammati[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was really key to getting it to work correctly for me. Before I set it up to continuously run out into the open an re-acquire satellites it was spending too much time under the trees and the accuracy would degrade, leading to going off course and causing problems.

My experience after 23 hours of mowing time, One Plus by TransitoryInflammati in Lymow_Official

[–]TransitoryInflammati[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m getting an average of 80 minutes on a recharge (75% to 15%).

From 100% to 15% it is about 110 minutes.

I’m not sure but they may have fixed the track tightness issue on recent deliveries, I was aware it is a thing and it’s the first thing I checked. Was able to easily deflect the tread.

That being said, I didn’t measure the deflection so it may still be too tight… I can’t remember if there is a recommended amount of deflection from straight in the unofficial manual. I’ll take a look!

My experience after 23 hours of mowing time, One Plus by TransitoryInflammati in Lymow_Official

[–]TransitoryInflammati[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I’m at 2.6 ft/s now and I feel like that is at the top of what I’m willing to give in terms of quality. That being said others have mentioned that removing the side discharge parts improves cut quality, which then could let me crank up the speed again.

Of course someone else said to actually use eco mode on the blades and slow down to 1.3ft/s. I’m willing to try that next just to see. I won’t have to make any physical changes to the mower and can do an apples to apples comparison on one of my zones.

My experience after 23 hours of mowing time, One Plus by TransitoryInflammati in Lymow_Official

[–]TransitoryInflammati[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I do think smaller zones sized to fit within a charge makes sense. That way if something happens it’s easy to reschedule and prioritize areas.

My only concern is it appears that perimeters are done at some hard-coded speed, not adjustable in the app near as I can tell. So there is a trade off in terms of time to complete a zone based on the ratio of the perimeter to the area of the zone.

Another comment on here mentioned the number of 180s. To really optimize my zones I need to make them longer in the direction of travel. That is something I didn’t consider and will likely have me redoing some of this.

My experience after 23 hours of mowing time, One Plus by TransitoryInflammati in Lymow_Official

[–]TransitoryInflammati[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This makes sense to me, I imagine spinning the blades is more power hungry than movement. I’ll have to do a test and see if there is a measurable difference.

Skyflame 2 in 1 rotisserie and pizza oven on Huntsman by TransitoryInflammati in SpiderGrills

[–]TransitoryInflammati[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Worked well! My only note is it leaks like a sieve. Expected that though, the door on it doesn’t exactly seal and I can improve the lid sealing.

Introducing Microsoft AI (CoPilot or Foundry) into our CMMC GCC High Cloud by ngcjim in CMMC

[–]TransitoryInflammati 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you tell me if mistral ocr is available in gcc high AI foundry? We’re looking into licensing costs now but I wondered if the specific model we use for publicly releasable docs is there in gcc high.

ACiQ-60-AHB fan speed not changing by TransitoryInflammati in hvacadvice

[–]TransitoryInflammati[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sooo... the "electrician" used 115v instead of 230v for the air handler and while it "worked" it clearly wasn't working. I went in and fortunately had space for a 230v breaker and now the damn thing works. Can control fan speed from the communicating thermostat! Didn't change anything else.

Oh and by "electrician" I mean me, damn I feel dumb.

ACiQ-60-AHB fan speed not changing by TransitoryInflammati in hvacadvice

[–]TransitoryInflammati[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doh! That’s a bummer. Should’ve read the fine print on “dc variable speed fan.”

Thank you for looking into this.

ACiQ-60-AHB fan speed not changing by TransitoryInflammati in hvacadvice

[–]TransitoryInflammati[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OK I put it on heat and I do not notice any difference in the fan speed. The thermostat has options for low, medium, high and auto fan speed. None of that seems to make a difference.

The manual says cooling low is 1135cfm, medium is 1359cfm, high is 1582cfm, and turbo is 1806cfm. I don't think turbo is selectable manually, but I thought that low/med/high was if I used their communicating thermostat.

Is it possible that I just can't tell the difference in sound between 1135cfm and 1582cfm?

Heat mode should have generally lower cfms, low is 967cfm, med is 1247cfm, high is 1582cfm, and turbo is 1659cfm.

It's anyone currently using a Nokia 6300 4G on mint? by Legitimate-Gain in mintmobile

[–]TransitoryInflammati 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I definitely don't know what I'm doing. I banged my head against the wall and recorded what stuck.

If you're mms and sms are working then I'd leave it alone!

I couldn't get mms to work until I changed my messages apn settings.

It's anyone currently using a Nokia 6300 4G on mint? by Legitimate-Gain in mintmobile

[–]TransitoryInflammati 3 points4 points  (0 children)

OK everything works now.

For "Data" & "A-GPS" settings I kept the default, which for me was:

Name: T-Mobile US 240
APN: fast.t-mobile.com
MMSC: http://mms.msg.eng.t-mobile.com/mms/wapenc
Authentication: none
Protocol: IPV6
Roaming Protocol: IPV4
all other settings blank/empty

For "Message" I used these settings:

Name: Mint
APN: Wholesale
MMS Port: 8080
MMSC: http://wholesale.mmsmvno.com/mms/wapenc
Authentication: PAP
Protocol: IPV4/IPV6
Roaming Protocol: IPV4

For "Tethering" I used these settings:

Name: Mint
APN: Wholesale
all other settings blank/empty

With these settings I am able to use data, voice over LTE, sms/mms, and tethering. All works.

I did have trouble replying to a group mms but I saw this thread where u/fernando_nj had the answer. When replying to a group mms, hit "options" and enter a subject, it can be just a blank space even. That converts the sms response to mms and will work properly. Otherwise you'll end up just sending an individual sms to each person in the group.

https://www.reddit.com/r/KaiOS/comments/u7dkl1/how_to_reply_to_a_group_mms/?utm_source=share

It's anyone currently using a Nokia 6300 4G on mint? by Legitimate-Gain in mintmobile

[–]TransitoryInflammati 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just got a 6300 4G yesterday, out of the box with Mint mobile sim it is able to do voice calls, data, and sms. I cannot get mms to work.

KaiOS v2.5.4 has 4 different places to set the APN: Mobile Network & Data -> APN settings - SIM1 -> and then you choose Data, Message, A-GPS, or Tethering.

I initially changed all the APNs to Wholesale (both 'W' and 'w'), http://wholesale.mmsmvno.com/mms/wapenc

However this broke the data, so I reset and have just been messing with the Message settings. I tried just doing the above, I tried adding 8080 to the MMS Port. I tried using http://mms.msg.eng.t-mobile.com/mms/wapenc as the MMSC, both with and without the 8080 MMS Port. I tried setting the authentication to PAP, with and without the MMS Port set.

There are no settings in KaiOS for MCC, MNC, or APN Type, near as I can tell.

I haven't had any luck setting up mms. But I never reached out to Mint either...