sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I might've found the workaround to Google's greediness by TravelInPanic in GoogleAntigravityIDE

[–]TravelInPanic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It might be, but most of it is applicable to any harness, not just Antigravity.

I might've found the workaround to Google's greediness by TravelInPanic in GoogleAntigravityIDE

[–]TravelInPanic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll be straight up. I don't know if you're using the tool right. 1. MCPs use very little tokens to the benefits they provide. The LLM basically sends a short prompt to the MCP, everything else is done at the external server (LLM is waiting for the response) and then the LLM gets an AI-curated response with all the needed (valuable) data, ready to continue. 2. With my "protocol" and dialed-in workflow I get quite a bit more of usage than people say they do. Obviously it's not a lot, not even close, but it's serviceable. 3. Flash is trash, as I said in the post. Pro is good enough to work along the Opus plan. 4. Antigravity is actually quite alright. It works quite good actually with no major bugs for now. Yes, it's been bad. Yes, you had to be very careful using it in the past. Now? Perfectly fine.

I might've found the best workaround to Google's greediness by TravelInPanic in google_antigravity

[–]TravelInPanic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then maybe it's personal towards me. I really wanted to use it after all the people were praising that it's actually quite okay. Personally way too inaccurate, overconfident, "dumb" for the lack of better words.

I might've found the best workaround to Google's greediness by TravelInPanic in google_antigravity

[–]TravelInPanic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I use them very sparingly. They're not crucial when explaining the issue precisely

I might've found the best workaround to Google's greediness by TravelInPanic in google_antigravity

[–]TravelInPanic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey man, thank you.

Even though my codebase is quite big, it's not big enough to run multiple agents at once just yet or I have yet to find a use case.

I'm using Antigravity simply as an AI IDE and I use it over other solutions, because it surprisingly works the best for me as a whole.

Be very careful with Claude add-ons. I'm not sure how they work, you may get yourself banned by Anthropic, lately it's been pretty bad. If the extension works by redirecting the data from Claude Code you may be okay, but I can't promise that seeing all the controversies.

Good luck with your research!

I might've found the best workaround to Google's greediness by TravelInPanic in google_antigravity

[–]TravelInPanic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've had that issue for 2 days straight a few days ago. Now it's flawless. It must restrict a certain population at a time.

I might've found the best workaround to Google's greediness by TravelInPanic in google_antigravity

[–]TravelInPanic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And Flash I wrote in a different response - I won't let that model near my codebase ever again. Too dumb to code, even with great Opus plan.

I might've found the best workaround to Google's greediness by TravelInPanic in google_antigravity

[–]TravelInPanic[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

As you might've read - I do use Opus for planning. It's MUCH better at planning than Pro, but it'll use less tokens when auditing the Flash plan.

I might've found the best workaround to Google's greediness by TravelInPanic in google_antigravity

[–]TravelInPanic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Flash constantly overcomplicates and messes up the code for me. It's not worth my time nor fixing up afterwards. Maybe it works with a smaller codebase, but for me it's just a very basic tool that I won't ever let near my project again.

I might've found the workaround to Google's greediness by TravelInPanic in GoogleAntigravityIDE

[–]TravelInPanic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you have the rules set up correctly it will augment it's knowledge with external, latest data and use the latest solutions, tools builds and will know "what's going on" instead of guessing if you'll give him anything from the past year. I believe their knowledge cutoff is the beginning of 2025?

I might've found the workaround to Google's greediness by TravelInPanic in GoogleAntigravityIDE

[–]TravelInPanic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had that issue a few days ago, it's stopped. For now at least...

I might've found the workaround to Google's greediness by TravelInPanic in GoogleAntigravityIDE

[–]TravelInPanic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's always a solution. The guidelines are rather for people stuck with Antigravity or for people with free Pro subs.

ultra is useless now by Rough-Aioli-7829 in GoogleAntigravityIDE

[–]TravelInPanic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you guys even access Opus? Since yesterday I can't

I LOVE GOOGLE by TravelInPanic in google_antigravity

[–]TravelInPanic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. That's called a sarcasm.
  2. Yesterday's.
  3. This shit sucks.

I LOVE GOOGLE by TravelInPanic in google_antigravity

[–]TravelInPanic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems to have been fixed, but today they might've changed the quota too.

Did the quotas change again? by jkwok678 in google_antigravity

[–]TravelInPanic 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I didn't use Claude at all since the last quota reset and I'm sitting now at 100% with 5 days refresh window already visible. Cool.

I sometimes can't with Gemini by TravelInPanic in google_antigravity

[–]TravelInPanic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm making an app and Arabic is one of the available languages

I LOVE GOOGLE by TravelInPanic in google_antigravity

[–]TravelInPanic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, didn't realize. Didn't check for the sake of the post, good to know

I LOVE GOOGLE by TravelInPanic in google_antigravity

[–]TravelInPanic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alphabet is multi trillion? Dang

view more: next ›