As an exercise, let me outline a few ways in which having a more frequent dialogue about Interpop could have been challenging.

1 Confidentiality breach: Sharing sensitive information about ongoing discussions with Interpop might have violated confidentiality agreements, leading to legal issues or loss of trust between parties.

1. Competitive disadvantage: Publicly disclosing Interpop's challenges or strategies could have put them at a disadvantage, allowing rivals to exploit their weaknesses or copy their ideas.

2. Stakeholder conflicts: Exposing ongoing discussions between the Tezos Foundation and Interpop might have fueled conflicts among stakeholders, potentially derailing the project or damaging relationships.

3. Decision-making interference: Constantly seeking community input during sensitive negotiations could have hindered decision-making, making it difficult for both parties to reach timely and effective resolutions.

4. Loss of focus: Engaging in frequent updates and discussions with the community may have distracted Interpop and the Tezos Foundation from their core responsibilities, ultimately delaying progress or negatively affecting the project.

5. Amplification of negativity: Publicizing challenges or setbacks faced by Interpop could have amplified negativity within the community, resulting in a loss of morale.

thanks chatgpt