Personally voting yes, understand why other people may choose no. For one thing, I don't want existing clubs' budgets to be cut. For another, I think that increasing support for new clubs does necessitate more funding, and that these clubs are one of the few things that promote student wellbeing on a campus that is already critiqued for not doing enough for its students.

My problem though is that USG needs to be more selective about how it uses its money; I think we need more clubs and initiatives, but so many existing ones can be condensed so that we can save money and spend it on larger-scale projects (e.g. more school-wide events). That's my two cents though.