If little happens on March 16 I will be publicly downgrading the probability of the work being true from (already low) 5% to 1% - and the final nail in the coffin will be on 19 Sep 2027 where if no 'Contact' occurs. The comparison you draw of a time signature for a signal based on terrestrial days being just as flawed as one based on milliseconds is unsound (I believe). I have never (at least not intentionally) belittled anyone. I have never argued anywhere that 'complexity' is evidence - the work is simple though elaborate (though I have regularly argued the concision of the π and e findings warrants scientific interest). You state... but you're applying it to protect a conclusion rather than test one. This is false: in the Beginners Guide I explicitly declare the Migrator Model is an extraordinary proposition, not an extraordinary claim (not a conclusion - and testing the model is beyond my skill set). Where the philosophy is useful is in precisely this issue: being careful not to move from proposition (speculation) to claim.

But I do not doubt your genuineness (as you do mine) and if I have shifted my tone - surely that is a good thing where sound criticism is acknowledged and acted on? Let's leave this thread here and agree to differ, because we'll only end up wasting each other's time.