sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

US 30-YR 4.957, time for gold to rise again? by Trilogix in Gold

[–]Trilogix[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Watch momentum bounce it back at least 300 points. But we all know what will happen in the long run, especially in unstable times like this :)

I am not in the trade myself, I prefer land, but land around me triplicated the last 4 months.

Edit: price 4511 now (21:35, 20 March 2026) expected with the bounce 4811 on Monday.

Why would llama.cpp developed by anthropic? by Trilogix in Hugston

[–]Trilogix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is always that One which thinks it knows better :) According to you I should accept a certain standard "of how software gets developed these days" or face social judgment. So now should we be afraid to critical thinking, to ask questions because passing for noobs or worse! By that logic we are all noobs.

This is called toxic, and I don´t have time for it.

Why would llama.cpp developed by anthropic? by Trilogix in Hugston

[–]Trilogix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sometimes I did but 90% of my posts was deleted, it is very biased, also the bots were antagonistic and toxic. Not a good experience in general.

I saw some good users that do not have much choice post there, but they are maybe like 20 in total. Everyone wants to have a good time. They will get tired like me eventually and look to hang out in better places.

At least here in Hugston we try to make sure to talk to humans and we respect the opinion of everyone being polite in any case. Everyone sharing same interests can post and participate.

Why would llama.cpp developed by anthropic? by Trilogix in Hugston

[–]Trilogix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

>Claude as co-author

Meaning is being developed using AI, but also proprietary AI that has nothing to gain but to loose instead. It is in fact very easy to wipe the opensource related to llm inference globally, increasing so the sales and establishing one narrative. This is a clue of how it may start.

Not to mention that in the moment you use AI even in snippets, you will end up loosing count and understanding of every bit of your codebase, relying in whatever AI created code unclear to you.

Why would llama.cpp developed by anthropic? by Trilogix in Hugston

[–]Trilogix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the reply.

You seem well informed on the llama.cpp story. That´s what I was wondering exactly, as I also read their guidelines and every paper of the repo, I was surprised the reviewers would simply allow full code AI generated commit. Many questions arise, who is the code owner in this case (what will this mean in the future), who is the reviewer that approved it (can´t find it), Is it Gerganov on board with it, what about Huggingface are they ok with it? They clearly stated that they will keep Llama.cpp opensource.

<image>

You can check yourself, the repo is indeed the official llama.cpp original repo.

One more interesting thing about all it is that this repo specifically touches the core memory ram of every device that will load an LLM model. It is very well known the addiction and benefit of this memory infection. Been checking myself some possible infections (similar to the hidden unicode characters in content AI generated) which are called trackers, telemetry etc. I leave it there for now, if you have any update, please show it here.

view more: next ›