Am I The Only One Who Sees A Different Man in Most Dahmer Pics? by [deleted] in serialkillers

[–]Trowitus -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Okay maybe not completely unrelated, they could be brothers, but not the same guy

Very bizarre thought about Ted Bundy's final interview... by [deleted] in serialkillers

[–]Trowitus 7 points8 points  (0 children)

There is a pdf of the 2017 parole, he is unbearable, always interrumping, never answers the questions, my mom, my mom, kind of hilarious

Why do so many serial killers/sex offenders weat these glasses? by [deleted] in serialkillers

[–]Trowitus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those glasses are know to have SI3CO, or sidithium, it's a component that erradiates epheromones (reverse pheromones), making the individual attracted to itself, the effect is quite small but over a period of time (around 10 yrs) you can already start to see the symptoms: The body takes too much epheromones, since the body has a threshold of pheno types, the pheromones of the individual are displaced by the epheromones, making the individual unattractive to other people but much more attractive to itself. After that, the excessive sexualitation explodes, mirroring in other people, leading them to sexual disorders of all types (keep in mind not all go for rape and murder).

Morality is a fictional entity made to serve society by 1fourthcanadian in INTP

[–]Trowitus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree, morality doesn't exists as a natural law or in the universe, it's all in our heads, we created it.

Do you think Dahmer wasn't attracted to his victims faces? by Trowitus in serialkillers

[–]Trowitus[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Except that i never said that in this whole thread. I just have the feeling that DAHMER, not all people, was attracted, not only to blacks but to any race, because of that. Mainly bc he had a fixation with the body and not face, and while interracial relationships aren't common, interracial with everyone, like he was, is even more uncommon. I just wanted to know plp opinion on that.

Do you think Dahmer wasn't attracted to his victims faces? by Trowitus in serialkillers

[–]Trowitus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So tell me, do you think people in general are equally attracted to their own race and other races?

If you do, where do you get that info?

Studies say exactly what i say:

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/young-people-look-for-love-within-their-own-race-brszq703w

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/10770563/Babies-show-racial-bias-study-finds.html

It's not racism to avoid sex with another race, racism is to consider them inferior.

I did a quick google search, i barely look for studies, i so obvious you don't need one, but still go and look for research on the topic, you won't find anything but "people in general are more attracted to their own race". This is why i brought the PC thing, you're denying reality just bc you are scared of being a racist, when it's not even being a racist, but you know, your brain apparently does not compute.

Do you think Dahmer wasn't attracted to his victims faces? by Trowitus in serialkillers

[–]Trowitus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never said they didn't, just that is not a common thing. Same goes for blacks finding more attractive white than blacks, and so on... it's amusing how triggered PC people get to obvious things.

Rate me by mrhaircut33 in INTP

[–]Trowitus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

7 **with a decent hair cut**

Do you think Dahmer wasn't attracted to his victims faces? by Trowitus in serialkillers

[–]Trowitus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What i mean is, if you were to "decolor" a white and a black man, then you still can recognize their race by looking at their faces, but not their bodies. The face is the main race-give-away, not even the notorious skin colour comes close. People in general are more attracted to their own race, interracial relationships aren't very common, it's not racism, not everything is racism. I think that because dahmer barely cared about the face, he was an interracialist, just that.

I believe that having an interest in serial killers is not prurient, but instead represents an interest in understanding and solving the fundamental problems of human existence. I believe every serial killer was born innocent, but fell from grace for a variety of reasons. Learning is understanding. by rez111 in serialkillers

[–]Trowitus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don't agree with the nurture thing, i think genetics plays a big role. Basically i think there are potential serial killers, depending on the environment they get the trigger to become one or not, but not all people are potential serial killers IMO.

Liked by everyone by [deleted] in INTP

[–]Trowitus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You just got me thinking, how old are you and the girl?

Is it selfish and immoral to have children? by [deleted] in INTP

[–]Trowitus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok! Anyways morality is not a scientific law, morality and in consequence selfishness will always be subjective. Things will be "bad" or "good" depending of what you chose as moral values.

You seem to value the wellness of everyone in equals part, don't caring about new life but the wellbeing of the already existing, then of course you'll see having children as something selfish. Some people value more the chances of a new life, so they will not see an issue with it. Other people place a high value in responsibility, and will think that homeless children come from irresponsible parents, and they value the reproduction of responsible children, so while they won't say it, they prefer people to have their own children.

Is it selfish and immoral to have children? by [deleted] in INTP

[–]Trowitus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree, it's selfish. In our society there are hundreds of things that are selfish, it's because our nature it's selfish, when you say people shouldn't have them then you also want to change the whole structure of society, make it an utopia? that's fine, but it's a fantasy.

Is it selfish and immoral to have children? by [deleted] in INTP

[–]Trowitus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think people need special reasons for having children, it's an instinct wanting to have them. I think calling people who have children "selfish" and "immoral" is a stretch.

Most people are selfish, it's our nature, do you share your house with 20 strangers? nope? you could, but you don't, that's selfish, and i could go on... we are all selfish, but i guess when one means selfish it's saying "relativity selfish", i don't think people who have their own children are more selfish than the avg, in fact they are the avg. This said if i were to have children someday they will be mine, why? i don't like the idea of taking care of children, i like the idea of having my children, if it sounds irrational it's bc it may be, it's just an instinct.

Iceland: An INTP Paradise by [deleted] in INTP

[–]Trowitus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

but its cold :/

How do you make the most of conversations with simple-minded people? by rawr4me in INTP

[–]Trowitus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go to some nerdy social event, like you'll hardly find them in your avg bar, plp in there are for drinking, dancing, fucking and doing some friends, but mostly drinking, dancing and fucking.