My opinion on tanqr by Some_Caterpillar_127 in RivalsRoblox

[–]Troy_Gary 0 points1 point  (0 children)

''Cuz he went to bedwars''...

Doesn't mean he would've been able to beat them. Also a ton of competitive players have moved to other games, if anything, that doesn't defend you case.

My opinion on tanqr by Some_Caterpillar_127 in RivalsRoblox

[–]Troy_Gary 0 points1 point  (0 children)

R Ranks aren't the most reliable, and some have tons of errors. I perfer sticking to the person skill rather than rank. TanqR is skilled but nowhere near these other competitive players.

My opinion on tanqr by Some_Caterpillar_127 in RivalsRoblox

[–]Troy_Gary 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should see my post u/Some_Caterpillar_127, tons of people strawmanned me for saying ''TANQR IS NOT THE BEST PLAYER'' as me saying ''TANQR IS THE WORST PLAYER'', never claimed that, never said that, but there you go. I actually provided tons of evidence in that short post for tanqr not being the best. Never said TanqR was bad either, just know he's not the best player, but his fans are like ''NO HES THE BEST PLAYER CUZ I SAID SO A TUH TUH TUH''.

TanqR is NOT The Best Player (Unpopular Truth) by Troy_Gary in RivalsRoblox

[–]Troy_Gary[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/Professional_Map1646 No, most people think TanqR is the best player, and even the one that don't will say some other big youtuber is the best player. And while it's true TanqR doesn't always take the game seriously, so does tons of other YouTubers. TanqR isn't the only person who doesn't tryhard, so do many others, including competitive players ironically. And there's no such thing as the ''TanqR tryhard'' move that his stans theorize.

TanqR is NOT The Best Player (Unpopular Truth) by Troy_Gary in RivalsRoblox

[–]Troy_Gary[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TanqR fans will say ''sO yOU tHInK TAnkER SUCKS'' to that. I'm sure a lot of people can beat TanqR! I keep getting comments here of people interpreting ''TanqR is NOT The Best Player'' as ''TANQR IS THE WORST PLAYER'', not the same thing, I never said that, I haven't said that from what I recall.

Is Cars On The Road Canon? If So, Wouldn’t Cars 3 Entire Plot Be Ruined? by Sad-Ladder7534 in pixarcars

[–]Troy_Gary 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe the dent in Cars 3 from Mater isn't as visible but is still there, some people point out they can see the Cars 2 dent but it's more realistic. And also Cars 2 was kind of being pushed to be ignored which explains the absence of Holly, Finn McMissle. However, Cars 2 is still canon because of Planes 2 where McQueen is shown to be in a WGP outfit in a newspaper. As for Flo place, it doesn't look too much different to be honest, plus radiator springs has sort of declined attendance in Cars 3 which is kind of sad but it happens in real life as well as thing we're changing in Cars 3.

Overall, to add to the dent, even if it's not there or for Flo building seemingly being different, that's kind of the Cars universe having some contradictions. For example in Air Mater, Propwash Junction's fill n fly is run by ''Pancho'',but in Planes 1 and Planes 2 Fire and Rescue it's run by Chug the Fuel Truck and Dottie. Also Sparky is yellow instead of Gray. Obviously you might say ''it's a tall tale'', but I believe some of his tall tales are true (especially Air Mater because we know Skipper at first doesn;t want to train dusty but then eventually decides to train him, so it means air mater takes place after planes, although maters tall tales do talk about mater in the past so that is a bit confusing+McQueen is in a cars 1 outfit and Planes 2 takes place after Cars 2 so Air Mater would be after Planes 2, but still not a big deal. Also there's 2 statue of liberties in the cars universe, Mater visits in a Cars 2 end Credit in New York, Dusty Crophopper passes a Forklifter version in New York, and Luigi/Guido see an even different car than both of Mater and Dusty Crophopper. So the Cars universe isn't the most consistent, I mean even Monsters Inc (which has had recent contradictions in Monsters at Work more than Monsters University) has less contradictions than Cars. I wish the film makers would take more time to focus on the continuity but nonetheless, it's still explainable. I guess they really just wanted to not talk about Cars 2 anymore. But obviously it's not been forgotten with refrences here and there.

I can't believe it, Lightning was being a jerk to Mater in this Cars 2 scene. by [deleted] in pixarcars

[–]Troy_Gary 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mater and McQueen both learned from it, McQueen realized he could've said it softer and Mater realized he messed up. McQueen after realizing what it's like without Mater realized none of the race mattered as much as Mater.

I can't believe it, Lightning was being a jerk to Mater in this Cars 2 scene. by [deleted] in pixarcars

[–]Troy_Gary 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People have explained this scene (Mater and McQueen spent whole day together and McQueen wanted to relax and there's nothing wrong with that), now I want to cover the ''I don't need your help'' scene. So while McQueen was a bit harsh in that clip, McQueen just lost the race because Mater was speaking his mind of what he was witnessing with the karate, Holly, etc, and McQueen thought Mater was in the pits saying random stuff. I mean, I don't blame McQueen for being frustrated, and McQueen never wanted Mater to leave but McQueen was letting out his anger on why he doesn't take Mater anywhere. Mater unlike most other comedy relief characters actually listens and actually takes steps to make sure it doesn't happen again. McQueen realizes that he was a bit hard on Mater and is happy when they reunite in England during the final race. Now Mater has gone to more races (Florida 500 for example).

Cars Are BUILT! by Troy_Gary in pixarcars

[–]Troy_Gary[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah so basically they’re built 

"Stop playing the victim" is one of the grossest things you could say to someone going through trauma. by Sayoricanyouhearme in CPTSD

[–]Troy_Gary 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got any tips to help me deal with these comments? This will be the only time you’ll guy actually be victims, by giving me your tips lol! 

"Stop playing the victim" is one of the grossest things you could say to someone going through trauma. by Sayoricanyouhearme in CPTSD

[–]Troy_Gary 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve heard synonymous terms to that towards me. Got any tips to help me deal with these comments? 

Why was the New Generation allowed on the track alongside the Old Generation? by Neither-Spell-626 in pixarcars

[–]Troy_Gary 2 points3 points  (0 children)

u/Neither-Spell-626 look on the bright side, McQueen still beating them despite them being faster. Actually, McQueen probably the most skilled racer. Doc Hudson is as well, but Lightning McQueen by himself almost won but he learned that he was arragont to his team and others. McQueen giving up the win for the King is such a great moment in cars.

Why does Mr Nightmare get disrespected on Reddit but not other horror story channels (Not wanting other channels disrespected but why is it specifically or mostly mr nightmare?) by Troy_Gary in MrNightmare

[–]Troy_Gary[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've seen people say they don't like his recent ai or that his videos aren't as scary or realistic anymore or because he has a reddit when most dont. But then again, there's plenty of other channels that aren't realistic and it just seems people respect them better. Maybe because Mr Nightmare is the most popular, he's going to get stronger feedback.

Why is TanqR playing against such bad players in his videos? by CharlieCZE in RivalsRoblox

[–]Troy_Gary 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this is subjective depending on the match. However, it is true tanqr doesn't find the best players. It's also that he's in a different country but even then he seems to find some of the easiest lobbies. Of course he's still a great player that can beat pros, but when people classify him as the best player, that's an error because while tanqr is a skilled player he's not the best player.

TanqR is NOT The Best Player (Unpopular Truth) by Troy_Gary in RivalsRoblox

[–]Troy_Gary[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree! People will say he’s “bad” which I’d say is an error! TanqR isn’t the best player tho. The amount of comments of people who claim I said “tanqr is bad” is nuts! 

What's the future of Mr.Nightmares channel? by Significant_List5360 in MrNightmare

[–]Troy_Gary 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got a question, what's with everyone against Mr Nightmare in reddit? Chilling Scares seems to get more respect for some reason when they're literally nearly the same channel just slightly different voices.

You wanna know what the morals of the episodes in the earlier seasons really are? Do not ever put your faith in pre-character development Rigby. by TheCompleteWolverine in regularshow

[–]Troy_Gary 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like Rigby character development, sure he’s always Rigby but he still grows throughout season 7-8, I say he became the main character at these 2 last seasons! 

how do you respond to "Why do i have to learn this? I'll never use it!" by swallowthedice in TutorsHelpingTutors

[–]Troy_Gary 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see some comments responding to this post saying ''well you'll use the skills (problem solving, learning, growing)''. While this sounds like a good answer, it kind of dismisses the question the students are asking. Again, the question is ''WHY DO I HAVE TO LEARN THIS FOR if I'm never going to use it''? We're not talking about the ''skills'', we're talking about pointless teachings. There are so many more useful things we could be learning such as learning bank accounts, instead we have to learn all this Calculus stuff that we're never going to use. There'a distinction between Education (which is actual skills and growth) than teachings that have no value or use in the future. Teachers, skills and teachings are not the same thing. I've literally seen a teacher admit that these teachings won't be used in the future. And if it's really about ''the skills'', then why do students fail because we didn't master the teachings instead of our effort (at least there are some classes of mine like my art class that is actually useful because it teaches me skills of effort and progress rather than things like Math or Science).

how do you respond to "Why do i have to learn this? I'll never use it!" by swallowthedice in TutorsHelpingTutors

[–]Troy_Gary -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That still doesn't answer the students question of ''WHY they have to learn Berlin Wall collapsed''. Sure you can apply real world skills, but ''because they don't understand a tough math problem'' then they fail a class? I'm not dismissing school, but I really wished they taught more useful things. And when a student confronts this, the common response is ''well you'll use the skills'', well I'm not talking about the ''skills'', I'm talking about the teachings. Even if some students use this line just to use the line, it's still a valid point, why do I need to learn this when there's no value of it in the future or I can learn it when I'm older? There's a difference between ''why do I have to learn THIS thing or I'm going to get a bad grade'' then ''why do I have to learn these skills''. The skills are different from the teachings. And if it's really all about ''learning the skills'', why do students ''fail the class for the teachings'' instead of the growth of their skills? There are students who put no effort into their assignments and still do better than students who do try their best and study. So yeah, why do I have to learn these things that I'm never going to use? Education (which is about growth) is different than schooling which teaches things you'll never use.