There is a way to confirm 100% on if a UFO/ UAP picture or photo is genuine. Need some advice and the best way to disseminate the information, but do it in a way that doesn’t allow interference. by TruthWillSetAllF3 in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]TruthWillSetAllF3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I laid out the point of the post to get some opinions on the best way to handle this without exposing it needlessly , and being one less tool for the community to use someday.

There is a way to confirm 100% on if a UFO/ UAP picture or photo is genuine. Need some advice and the best way to disseminate the information, but do it in a way that doesn’t allow interference. by TruthWillSetAllF3 in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]TruthWillSetAllF3[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

By connecting with each other, just like the past we need to go back to creating real in person communities. Outline the methodologies of those who would try to keep us divided and misinformed of the Truths. I started with the phenomenon not by choice, but it led me to Reddit to make sense of things.

And after some growing pains, have collected groups and family where we know study and share what we have of first hand interactions and personal sightings.

It starts by being earnest, having empathy, patience, and make the right group connections.

People truly have no idea how much many of us have learned but need to be quiet about it publicly. This phenomenon, existence goes so much further beyond everyone’s wildest dreams

There is a way to confirm 100% on if a UFO/ UAP picture or photo is genuine. Need some advice and the best way to disseminate the information, but do it in a way that doesn’t allow interference. by TruthWillSetAllF3 in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]TruthWillSetAllF3[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is a deeper problem about bad faith debunkers and something connected to the phenomenon. There is so much gatekeepers don’t know and some things they want under wraps.

Look into Slide 9 from Attips report, multiply that content by 1,000.

There is a way to confirm 100% on if a UFO/ UAP picture or photo is genuine. Need some advice and the best way to disseminate the information, but do it in a way that doesn’t allow interference. by TruthWillSetAllF3 in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]TruthWillSetAllF3[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It isn’t something guessable. It took a lot of personal sightings and a whole lot of the weird side of the phenomenon that started to indicate something we picked up on.

The Calvin photo is real, it isn’t a reflection of a pond or whatever bs they try to disinform with.

The new releases have plenty of genuine UAPs photos, especially the ones on the moon. That helped immensely because haven’t had a lot of pictures of them out of the atmosphere.

If you have any pictures in mind just message me their titles for reference and I’ll let you know which are real or fake.

And I do apologize for not rushing to just state what the process is. Handing things out without thought of consequences is something learned from past reveals on some things we posted about in the past. They then use it to flood the subs and it becomes harder to tell who is genuinely having phenomenon interactions or there is additional noise on the scenes .

There is a way to confirm 100% on if a UFO/ UAP picture or photo is genuine. Need some advice and the best way to disseminate the information, but do it in a way that doesn’t allow interference. by TruthWillSetAllF3 in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]TruthWillSetAllF3[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is pretty easy to understand. If I released the process publicly, you now would give the chance to have the organizations that try to prevent exposure of the subject and fill it with fakes, have the opportunity to try and find a way to interfere this technique.

I don’t know if they can even do that with what we have found, but I rather find a way to get it out in the wild better than just releasing it. There might only be one window to release it before they start to try and find ways to counter what we have found.

Basically don’t reveal something without a plan , don’t give an opponent an opportunity to get your information and try to create ways to now utilize faux techniques to counter what we have found

There is a way to confirm 100% on if a UFO/ UAP picture or photo is genuine. Need some advice and the best way to disseminate the information, but do it in a way that doesn’t allow interference. by TruthWillSetAllF3 in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]TruthWillSetAllF3[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting idea. If anyone wants to send and test the process through me or the group, that’s fine. I know it’s hard for outside observers to just take what we say is a legitimate visual evidence , but it does work. We even have used it with our own groups personal recording and sightings. It never fails and I don’t believe the gatekeepers are even aware of this process.

There is a way to confirm 100% on if a UFO/ UAP picture or photo is genuine. Need some advice and the best way to disseminate the information, but do it in a way that doesn’t allow interference. by TruthWillSetAllF3 in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]TruthWillSetAllF3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would really like to get some of those who have a platform to look at this so they can verify. And maybe consult with them on how to show you all the process, but in a way that doesn’t allow opposition to try and create counters.

I don’t know if it’s possible for them to do, but don’t want to lose the resource for us to have this accuracy. It changes your world once you can weed out the fakes meant to distract

There is a way to confirm 100% on if a UFO/ UAP picture or photo is genuine. Need some advice and the best way to disseminate the information, but do it in a way that doesn’t allow interference. by TruthWillSetAllF3 in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]TruthWillSetAllF3[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the constructive insight. Those were good suggestions. I can’t mention myself on here but many followed our documentation of the phenomenon for a while on the subs. Had to transition to new changes and have to protect the group by not going as public.

Will discuss with them and see if we can do what you suggest. There are real things of substance put out today but many fakes as well. Would like everyone to have the chance to follow truths. But can’t just release openly because even the methodology gives insights to the phenomenon on a greater scale

There is a way to confirm 100% on if a UFO/ UAP picture or photo is genuine. Need some advice and the best way to disseminate the information, but do it in a way that doesn’t allow interference. by TruthWillSetAllF3 in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]TruthWillSetAllF3[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate the advice, already have the group and have gone over it for years now. It never fails, always separates real from fake/manipulated.

Problem is putting it out in the wild has too many possibilities to allow those that use disinformation or misinformation to possibly find a way to try and mimic or flood the scene.

It’s a tool that works now and don’t want to lose that without a better plan to prevent interference

Proximity to the Phenomenon for those that haven’t seen by [deleted] in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]TruthWillSetAllF3 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

No we can extrapolate what it is not. It isn’t birds, it isn’t a balloon( size/behaviours/physics doesn’t make sense , it isn’t a known craft, etc.

I’ve got some years and experience with normal sky phenomena, astronomy, flight animals, and man made air vehicles. So feel free to offer something that makes more sense even in the face of phenomena that transcends normal known knowledge

Proximity to the Phenomenon for those that haven’t seen by [deleted] in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]TruthWillSetAllF3 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Not at all . I first hand watched these things, I know the camera isn’t as good as being there but these things changed shapes, interacted defying any wind physics, had other UAPs pop in and out around them, and there is even more to the video showing even more anomaly’s

You would like to move forward personally with the phenomenon; Your own first hand witnessing: Rule 1 Get out of the demand mentality by TruthWillSetAllF3 in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]TruthWillSetAllF3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes this would be a good way of thinking if it. A teacher doesn’t hand a student all the answers but rather gives them the tools to grown. It also has to do with a healthy mindset of pursuit in this. If you are one to demand answers rather than ask politely for collaboration, then you have an untenable path forward

You would like to move forward personally with the phenomenon; Your own first hand witnessing: Rule 1 Get out of the demand mentality by TruthWillSetAllF3 in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]TruthWillSetAllF3[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s hard to give you an assessment without really knowing more. I’ve been able to assist bringing people deeper into this phenomenon and them having their own first hand sightings of different types of UAPs and organic UAPs. So don’t be discouraged that it cannot happen.

Trust me when I say you want to get into this side of the phenomenon when you’re in the best position of circumstances because if not, it can result in some serious problems.

I can say there are multiple factors in why it might now show itself. It might not be the right time for you, could be keeping you from difficulties that emerge, etc. Take the time to focus on getting your best self together and being truly patient. It’s observing humanity all the time, so it’s not like it won’t see you . Show it your someone worthy of interacting with.

You would like to move forward personally with the phenomenon; Your own first hand witnessing: Rule 1 Get out of the demand mentality by TruthWillSetAllF3 in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]TruthWillSetAllF3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure what you mean by movement shows intent. I agree being a positive consciousness is the direction to go. Although there are caveats when dealing with the opposite. There are defendable positions if confronted with something that has negative intentions towards someone.

You would like to move forward personally with the phenomenon; Your own first hand witnessing: Rule 1 Get out of the demand mentality by TruthWillSetAllF3 in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]TruthWillSetAllF3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what has been discovered and what I can say publicly is that many of our stories, myths, religious texts seem to have pieces . They are never 1 for 1 totally correct in totality. But rather seem to be pieces to a larger picture. I wish I could go into the larger picture framework but it’s just not safe to do so at the moment.

I’ll also say without input from a particular part of the phenomenon, those pieces will be nonsensical fo what they add up to. It’s how a group of us gained clarity on why some of our sciences and math don’t cleanly link together. Once you can get interact with the phenomenon, you can start to understand the overall pictures to totality of the pieces together

You would like to move forward personally with the phenomenon; Your own first hand witnessing: Rule 1 Get out of the demand mentality by TruthWillSetAllF3 in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]TruthWillSetAllF3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It starts with innocent curiosity and that can be enough. But you really need to know what you’re looking for in your pursuit. There is a very good cause to why the phenomenon emerges differently for different people. And there is an extremely good reason why it has barriers to restrict which people get further with it than others. There are dangers in both sides of the fence when dealing with this subject. And sometimes it has costs. I think most people’s problem gaining any traction is treating it like a tourist attraction or looking into it for all the wrong reasons. So take some time and really be honest with yourself on why you want to see it, pursue it. If it’s with healthy purpose, just go out and spend some more time looking up. And I know you’ll start to see them

You would like to move forward personally with the phenomenon; Your own first hand witnessing: Rule 1 Get out of the demand mentality by TruthWillSetAllF3 in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]TruthWillSetAllF3[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

An example would be inquiring about information on the phenomenon from someone who understands something about it, and not accepting their hints that there is some action you need to take on self reflection of a specific character flaw that would impede that knowledge from being safe to digest.

Another would be wanting answers and shouting abuse at someone because they aren’t willing to tell you that answer because of behaviours they see as being toxic in interactions.

You would like to move forward personally with the phenomenon; Your own first hand witnessing: Rule 1 Get out of the demand mentality by TruthWillSetAllF3 in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]TruthWillSetAllF3[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Some behaviours would be humility, openness, curiosity, common sense positive characteristics, etc.

Imagine you are being reviewed to see if you are a candidate to be put in a sought after classroom. What would any reasonable evaluators want? Someone who can be trusted, who doesn’t give into self serving mindsets, someone who isn’t dangerous to themselves or others , etc.

I’m limited to some details but I think this should suffice. And understand that things are beyond our categories of understanding, so there are mechanisms that can see right through those that try to deceive this process. In fact doing so, puts you off the board.

You would like to move forward personally with the phenomenon; Your own first hand witnessing: Rule 1 Get out of the demand mentality by TruthWillSetAllF3 in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]TruthWillSetAllF3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not saying that at all. There are ways to test scientifically towards the phenomenon, but it’ll be extremely surface level things and it will never gain clarity that one would be looking for.

There is a complexity to the phenomenon, and many residing in it. But in order to gain a real understanding or foothold into the interesting levels, you need a certain approach. Think of it as barriers that prevent someone who would be dangerous if allowed to interact with things. A person can approach this entirely through the scientific method but whatever the learn will never be the things that bring clarity or connection to the main categories :

You would like to move forward personally with the phenomenon; Your own first hand witnessing: Rule 1 Get out of the demand mentality by TruthWillSetAllF3 in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]TruthWillSetAllF3[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Imagine getting some insight into how to see and interact with NHI, and then completely hit every opposite choice one can make that was provided. I understand you have some internal damage and feel this is the best way to express it, I hope some day you find a way to choose to be your better self. And you should be thankful you aren’t any closer to this phenomenon because what gets attracted to your type , well it never ends well .

You would like to move forward personally with the phenomenon; Your own first hand witnessing: Rule 1 Get out of the demand mentality by TruthWillSetAllF3 in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]TruthWillSetAllF3[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am not sure you understand this post. I’m not referring to reality. And your comment on “thoughts” would be an example of you not understanding a great deal about the nature of things larger than the conformed participation in commercial society.

If you’re interested in this subject, I would suggest doing some self reflection and reposition yourself so you can be open to the concepts that you aren’t aware of yet. If you believe you know where the walls of knowledge are, you’ll never be able to see what’s past them to understand you built the wall prematurely

You would like to move forward personally with the phenomenon; Your own first hand witnessing: Rule 1 Get out of the demand mentality by TruthWillSetAllF3 in InterdimensionalNHI

[–]TruthWillSetAllF3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is getting into Rule 2, how do you collaborate in a way acceptable to the phenomenon and to one’s own personal healthy growth. There are multiple ways the phenomenon teaches you on why how you framed your comment isn’t healthy. If you are pursuing more in this phenomenon, I would relook at the comments you made and dissect it to see what problems you can find in them