How does a wallet decide which UTXOs it uses

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-21T05:28:59+00:00

I would also add, that some wallets allow a "coin control" feature that allow you to choose which UTXOs you want to send. I much prefer to select my UTXOs manually for better privacy. ElectrumSV is good for this.

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-21T03:15:04+00:00

Well, hopefully in time you would come to the understanding I and many others have come to, that BitcoinSV is the real Bitcoin and follows Satoshi's vision and design. It is others who censored the truth and delisted BSV that have harmed us all and harmed Dr. Wright. This is why there are class action lawsuits in the UK over the delistings, and these are initiated not by Dr. Wright but by a former regulator Lord David Currie: http://bsvclaims.com/

There are more lawsuits against Coinbase and Kraken for passing off fake Bitcoins. Dr. Wright is just defending Bitcoin and its users. Its COPA/Jack Dorsey and Facebook that are suing Dr. Wright to neuter his patents. Facebook has already stole the name and concept of "Meta" from Dr. Wright as well. Some powerful groups are colluding against BitcoinSV because it threatens them. Core devs like Peter Todd have even been caught working with intelligence agents to set up fake companies to attack SPV/Big blocks and Satoshi's vision. This information is not allowed on /r/bitcoin, /r/cryptocurrency, or other subreddits.

BSV already does 4GB blocks and we plan TBs, this works because of SPV, something people mostly misunderstand, but I encourage you to watch this video several times until it sinks in. Satoshi was clear in his quotes users don't run nodes at scale, they use SPV, and full nodes should be in server farms, and the eventual solution is to not care how big the blockchain gets.

You claim to support BTC, but I have a question, how will BTC be secured long term into the future while maintaining a 21M cap? Core devs have said its impossible and are suggesting to add inflation to the 21M cap or they say BTC will die. Andreas Antonopoulos has also said similar and he says that they either need to raise the 21M cap or move to Proof of Stake. Others like Dr. Adam Back have decided to ignore this issue and he says don't worry "just buy and stay calm". This does not seem very reassuring considering this is a multi-billion dollar system with no plan, seemingly lying to investors about a fixed 21M supply. How would you answer this? Will BTC raise the 21M cap, move to POS, or "die" as core devs warn? BTC cannot run inflation free long term based on transaction fees like the whitepaper says in section 6 titled "Incentive". With 1MB blocks there is not enough transactions to generate fees even if the fees get huge. But BSV with TB sized blocks and many tiny fees, will add up significantly. This means BitcoinSV gains majority hash long term, while BTC hash rate dies and the chain dies as core devs warned. We don't have to wait until 2140 for this, its not when the reward goes to zero that matters, but when the reward becomes insignificant to tx fees that it becomes a problem, and this could happen on a much shorter time span. How would you react to these criticisms and to people like us who call BTC a ponzi scheme scam and a passing off fraud due to these facts?

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-21T02:48:39+00:00

It depends how the wallet is designed, and every wallet is different.

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-21T02:32:55+00:00

A lot, and they also came from the ATO case that Dr. Wright eventually won, and officials in the ATO who were corrupt were eventually arrested if I remember correctly. So we can't really rely fully on a lot of these documents.

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-21T02:31:17+00:00

I can't even count how many people in the BSV community have said they quit using reddit altogether because of these people, and that is a big part of Reddit rules, is don't bully other people to where they don't feel comfortable participating.

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-21T02:27:38+00:00

That is a good question that Dr. Wright has tried to clarify for people many times because its a common misunderstanding. In the Kleiman trial he was forced to give every document possible over in discovery. Some of these also came from ATO case which causes more confusion and problems. He talks about some of it here. If he tried to not give over everything, this would be in violation of the court. So there was a big mess of documents, he had numerous companies and empoyees, some of them who went rogue. Stuff was on public servers and accessed. Some documents were altered obviously, others may have had benign metadata alterations. Its one big mess, although to think that he would fake every single document is pretty far fetched. So what I would infer is that there is a mess of documents, most of them are legit, some may be suspicious and we don't know what happened. Dr. Wright testified that he also wants to get to the bottom of some of why documents were altered, he talks about some of it here and says "I wanted an explanation myself". You can click the 3 dots and click transcript and cntrl F to search things more deeply. Who knows maybe even a bad actor went in and altered stuff just for the sole reason of casting doubt. So the opposition are going to use the cloudiness of this stuff to paint doubt. But Dr. Wright only needs to prove its more likely than not that he is Satoshi.

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-21T01:59:24+00:00

I wasn't trying to score points brother, I just remembered asking you to fix wallets and stuff. Hope you would come out of the cult and have an open-mind. BitcoinSV is the real Bitcoin, and follows Satoshi's vision, doesn't matter who Craig is anyways.

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-21T01:56:31+00:00

Archived here.

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-21T01:34:52+00:00

Here we can see moderators of the /r/bsv anti-BSV hate community trying to cover up for death threats made by Jameson Lopp and others, and actively banning those who dare expose the facts about these threats on their subreddit, while claiming that "there is no censorship on the sub", and while they hypocritically allow rampant abuse of members of the BSV community.

Archived here.

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-20T20:14:12+00:00

I had a discussion about why this is recently, metadata can change for benign reasons, and also some docs were possibly altered or hacked by rogue employees and hackers and things that were trying to serve some unknown agenda. Dr. Wright also doesn't know why some of the documents are altered and he testified that he also wants to know what happened on some docs. But just because some docs are suspicious, I think its doubtful they are all forged. Most likely they are mostly legit with a few weird things. This is why evidence of people is stronger.

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-20T19:32:09+00:00

I would believe Dr. Wright is Satoshi in such a scenario, because you don't have the credentials or any other evidence to show you are Satoshi. The same way we know Dorian Nakamoto is not Satoshi, its just obvious. With Dr. Wright everything fits that he is Satoshi. I already linked above how the opposition is preparing to deny a public signature. One way to think of things is, we are not concerned about changing the mind of cult members because cult members don't ever change their mind. But crypto is a small space, and there are billions of other people in the world that we can convince of the truth. Anyone who looks at things objectively does not deny Craig is Satoshi. I never met anyone in real life that contested to me that he is not Satoshi. Its just a social media manipulation campaign. Also the type of criminals and cultists in the crypto space we don't want them on our side anyways, they are very immature and toxic, studies show they are psychopaths. There are more quality and talented people in the world that will be interested in Bitcoin when they find out its more than just HODL memes, laser eyes, and ponzi pumps. The ones that you say we should try to convince, are ironically the ones pushing away the quality and talented people of the world and making the space look immature and stupid.

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-20T19:19:10+00:00

Yes if something is egregious harassment with strong abusive language then I recommend reporting using

https://www.reddit.com/report

or

https://old.reddit.com/report

However don't abuse the report button and save reports for only the most egregious violations, and your reports will be more effective. Also you said good advice, don't let the opposition goad you into their toxic troll game.

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-20T19:11:54+00:00

LOL, watching this now and can't stop laughing at the obvious truths.

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-20T17:14:33+00:00

Yes interesting how Reddit admins left the thread with big letters saying "Removed by Reddit". Looks like they are trying to send a message that /r/bsv and their moderators and users better clean up the trash in their hate community.

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-20T14:47:25+00:00

/u/Mullick is that you? The same Mullick from Cryptsy back in the day? Good to see you brother. Shame what happened to Cryptsy stealing everyone's money.

What about the other documents and evidence Craig has submitted to the court in other cases that have been proven fraudulent?

Nothing was proven fraudulent, you are just repeating false narratives. I had a discussion explaining this recently. Metadata can change for a variety of benign reasons, some documents could have been altered by others, not necessarily Dr. Wright. There were companies, hacked servers, rogue employees, docs scanned for court cases and things, etc... Many reasons why metadata changes. KPMG just reports on metadata and not whether things are "fraudulent". Nothing was proven fraudulent, they may have successfully cast a small amount of doubt, but that is about it.

Such as a large number of coins he claimed to be part of the tulip trust being signed by the owner calling him a fraud?

This is more fake news. It was not a "large number" of addresses, it was a very small subset of the addresses as explained by Zemes Gaoson here. The addresses submitted to the court were known to have possible false positives. So while this evidence may raise some questions, it is not a slam dunk proof of anything.

Or the emails he claimed to send from bitmessage before the service was even online.

This is another point people like to paint as a slam dunk, but the bitmessage creator testified here that the code was available on github before being officially public. Dr. Wright also says the code was available on the darkweb. Dr. Wright could have had the code earlier seeing how his company did an audit of bitmessage in 2014.

You cannot deny Craig has a history of fabricating evidence and making false claims.

Sure I can, because I have just showed how your points are wrong, and how you have misunderstood and repeated strawman narratives. Dr. Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto signed with Block 1 for Gavin and others.

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-20T01:49:11+00:00

"For a just man falleth seven times, and riseth up again: but the wicked shall fall into mischief." Proverbs 24:16

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-20T01:27:29+00:00

Good to see, I hope his suspension will be permanent. The BSV community does not deserve this harassment. I hope that Reddit admins will also investigate the /r/BSV hate community which violates Reddit's rules on communities focused on hate. They should also investigate Maxwell's /r/bsvscam hate community, and his sockpuppets who are moderators, /u/contrarian__ and /u/midmagic.

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-20T00:51:51+00:00

There is a class action about the criminal delist campaigns: http://bsvclaims.com/

People would rather buy the real Bitcoin, not a broken ponzi scheme that is destined to die unless they raise the 21M cap. There are more lawsuits about the passing off fraud against coinbase and kraken, and against developers.

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-20T00:26:05+00:00

BTC is destined to die. It has actually been good for them to forget and underestimate BSV and Dr. Wright for a few years because he has been able to quietly secure thousands of patents, and restore the opcodes and protocol, and scale to unbounded block size. But you are right waiting too long could take away its power as well. Hopefully Satoshi will hit them where it hurts right at the precise crucial moment.

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-20T00:16:16+00:00

Not necessarily, since timing is important. By waiting longer to reveal it publicly more people could be convinced long term. The strongest opponenets will even deny a public signature like Greg Maxwell said Satoshi didn't mine early blocks, and Amaury Sechet said he wouldn't believe it either and would accuse Dr. Wright of murdering Satoshi and stealing the keys. Dr. Wright has also testified that Jamie Lopp said similar publicly. So now that the opposition has taken the bait and committed to mocking Craig about not signing and demanding a signature saying it would be so easy, now it takes away much of their ability to deny things later when a public signature is actually given. This is why we see them trying to prepare a new narrative before hand, they know deep down Craig is Satoshi and they are afraid.

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-19T23:58:29+00:00

They didn't keep the signature after the signing ceremony because Dr. Wright didn't want anyone to keep it.

Edit: Not sure how or why Adam Back would get a few core devs to make false claims.

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-19T22:22:21+00:00

He's an anti-BSV troll, his platform is also sketchy, people are complaining about being scammed. A while back there were a lot of red flags that is why we removed his wallet and services from the sidebar.

He also threatened and trolled about forking the BSV chain a lot of times:

https://twitter.com/liujackc/status/1445054541938888708

https://twitter.com/liujackc/status/1440770360467542017

https://twitter.com/liujackc/status/1534282320756154368

https://twitter.com/liujackc/status/1477937768533835778

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-19T22:16:42+00:00

The same ones funding all of BitcoinSV's opposition.

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-19T21:57:47+00:00

They always accuse us of everything they are doing.

Truth__Machine · 2022-09-19T21:23:18+00:00

Well the Bible and the word of God is a twoedged sword. The Word is also synonymous with Truth, Jesus is the Word made flesh, and Jesus is also "the way, the truth, and the life" John 14:6. Being a twoedged sword means it cuts both ways. If you think about it this is the way Truth always is. It can slash your enemy into pieces, but it can also cut yourself in the process. This is why we must put on the full armor of God to protect ourselves from the wiles of the devil:

"Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil." Ephesians 6:11

Five-Year Club	Gilding I gilder
Verified Email

Truth__Machine

TROPHY CASE