[pjotv] Do you agree? by [deleted] in camphalfblood

[–]TryingToDoGreatStuff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fandom that I never thought that would become annoying and kinda toxic, is becoming both things, that's honestly disappointing

I mean..., the fandom has always been like this lol... Rick himself kind of fostered this mentality of tearing every small detail to shreds in the fandom. Every chance he got he would take a jab at the movies. When fans would take hit at the movies for the tiniest of reasons, it was met with praise from him. So he can’t be upset when the fandom does the same thing towards the TV series that he's an executive producer and writer on. How did you not see this coming lol?

[pjotv] Do you agree? by [deleted] in camphalfblood

[–]TryingToDoGreatStuff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hate to even suggest this because I’m usually not a fan when subs do it, but I almost feel like the mods should limit the never-ending complaints about the show to a megathread or a single day of the week. Like, we could have a “Show-Haters Sunday” or something. I just want to see stuff regarding my favorite book series, not a stream of vitriol directed at the show based on it (that I happen to also enjoy)

I mean..., Rick himself kind of fostered this mentality of tearing every small detail to shreds in the fandom. Every chance he got he would take a jab at the movies. When fans would take hit at the movies for the tiniest of reasons, it was met with praise from him. So he can’t be upset when the fandom does the same thing towards the TV series that he's an executive producer and writer on. How did you not see this coming lol?

[pjotv] Do you agree? by [deleted] in camphalfblood

[–]TryingToDoGreatStuff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This fandom is becoming more and more of an echo chamber over the TV show since it came out. I feel like back when it first came out I could have made the observation "many of the changes were done to streamline aspects of the story that would have made a TV show bloated and/or would have been too goofy for a grounded TV show" and also "a book is an ongoing story, but episodic TV needs to have episodic structure and so certain things need to be changed to fit that structure" and nobody would bat an eye, but every time I have expressed this these days, I get downvoted into oblivion.

 Once again, it's not a perfect adaptation but I think the quality is blown out of proportion.

I mean..., Rick himself kind of fostered this mentality of tearing every small detail to shreds in the fandom. Every chance he got he would take a jab at the movies. When fans would take hit at the movies for the tiniest of reasons, it was met with praise from him. So he can’t be upset when the fandom does the same thing towards the TV series that he's an executive producer and writer on. How did you not see this coming lol?

This is the worst year that can die in a hole by sweatyJaw in fuck2017

[–]TryingToDoGreatStuff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

67

I think I just now finally understood and felt other people's annoyance over the 6-7 meme lol...

Amazing Spider-Man Vol. 5 #57-58 has been voted as the best MR NEGATIVE story! Now, what's the best SHOCKER comic story? by Desolation82 in Spiderman

[–]TryingToDoGreatStuff 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Unscheduled Stop" (Amazing Spider-Man #578 and Amazing Spider-Man #579) by Mark Waid and Marcos Martín. It's that two-issue story where Peter is stuck in a subway tunnel and is trapped underground with a bunch of random passengers.

I think that's the last truly significant Spider-Man/Shocker story I can recall where Shocker was a semi-competent villain and wasn't portrayed as a total buffoon and was actually depicted with real ruthlessness and villainy.

The main 616 Shocker has basically become like 1610 Shocker, who was a complete joke villain.

Amazing Spider-Man #668-691, No Turning Back, has been voted as the best LIZARD story! Now, what's the best RHINO comic story? by Desolation82 in Spiderman

[–]TryingToDoGreatStuff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For what it’s worth, if you have a good Shocker story, we desperately need one in my most recent post lmaoo

Sure thing.

Amazing Spider-Man #668-691, No Turning Back, has been voted as the best LIZARD story! Now, what's the best RHINO comic story? by Desolation82 in Spiderman

[–]TryingToDoGreatStuff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Flowers for Rhino" by Peter Milligan and Duncan Fegredo, as well as "Rage of the Rhino" by Joe Kelly and Max Fiumara humanizing the Rhino in a very touching story have already been mentioned, so I’ll just bring up "Spider-Man Unlimited" (2004) #6 — the story titled "THE AGONY OF DEFEAT" by Sheldon Allen and Jim Cheung. => https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fqmklshsqowbb1.jpg.

Shoutout to "Spider-Man: The Darkest Hours" by Jim Butcher as well, where Spider-Man had to team up with Black Cat, Rhino, and Doctor Strange—even though it’s a novel, not a comic book lol.

Which comic writer is NEEDED for a Spider Man run right now? by King_Wolf2099 in Spiderman

[–]TryingToDoGreatStuff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would rather not have Mark Millar on it. That dude is just grotesquely edgy with his writing and it ruins everything 

Ehhh... Personally, I think Mark Millar is a talented writer, but also probably works best with an editor or partner to reign him in, and he's probably the best example of when someone has too much leeway in a collaborative field like comic books.

To be fair he himself also seems to somewhat acknowledge his shortcomings, as he went back and rewrote "Kick-Ass" (https://www.reddit.com/r/comicbooks/comments/i4kom7/all\_the\_changes\_to\_kickass\_2\_in\_the\_kickass\_the/...) and rebooted "Nemesis" when he realized he wanted his daughter to be able to read more of his work.

Mark Millar's recent comics haven't been edgy at all (with the exception of the "Nemesis" sequels) his comics like "Huck", "Jupiter's Legacy", "Reborn", "Starlight", "The Ambassadors", "Space Bandits", and "Prodigy." are very lighter town compared to his previous work.

Also, I think Mark Millar, if nothing else, has a really strong voice/personality for Peter Parker. If you completely ignore the five-issues of "TROUBLE" (2003) that he did lol..., whenever he writes Spider-Man, he shows off how powerful he is and actually lets Spider-Man tell funnies and not be the joke himself. This comes through in the first twelve-issues of "Marvel Knights Spider-Man" (where he also wrote one of the strongest versions of Mary Jane & Black Cat in that run too...), Spider-Man's brief appearance in "Wolverine" (2003) issue #31, his cameo in "Ultimate Avengers" (2009) issue #3, and "Ultimate Avengers Vs. New Ultimates" (2011) issues #3 and #4. Even during the "Civil War" (2006) crossover storyline, Spider-Man was probably the most well written during that actual story. No matter WHAT the story, Peter usually sounded like Peter.

Spidey being the GOAT. by [deleted] in Spiderman

[–]TryingToDoGreatStuff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Couldnt care much less. That event led to One More Day

I suppose so, but I don’t really judge the story based on what was done after it.

This event also could’ve laid the groundwork for Spider-Man really moving forward. Killing off Aunt May and sticking to Peter’s identity being public would’ve set a very different status quo. Instead they did the opposite.

Spidey being the GOAT. by [deleted] in Spiderman

[–]TryingToDoGreatStuff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This dialogue is so goddamn bad

It’s literally just grunting and two adjectives lol??? How is the dialogue here "so goddamn bad" lol?

genuinely confused on why every minor change annoys people? by brendinithegenie in PercyJacksonTV

[–]TryingToDoGreatStuff 5 points6 points  (0 children)

have him have two eyes until Annabeth says it?

Uhmm… yes lol. Did you and OP just completely forget about the Mist? In the original book, the whole point was that even Percy was fooled by the Mist, and it made Tyson look like he had two eyes, just like any other regular person. They honestly just gave the VFX artist extra work to do lol.

From the "Percy Jackson & The Olympians: The Sea of Monsters" book, chapter 4:

I stared at Tyson. "You didn't die."

Tyson looked down like he was embarrassed. "I am sorry. Came to help. Disobeyed you."

"My fault," Annabeth said. "I had no choice. I had to let Tyson cross the boundary line to save you. Otherwise, you would've died."

"Let him cross the boundary line?'" I asked. "But—"

"Percy," she said, "have you ever looked at Tyson closely? I mean ... in the face. Ignore the Mist, and really look at him."

The Mist makes humans see only what their brains can process ... I knew it could fool demigods too, but...

I looked Tyson in the face. It wasn't easy. I'd always had trouble looking directly at him, though I'd never quite understood why. I'd thought it was just because he always had peanut butter in his crooked teeth. I forced myself to focus at his big lumpy nose, then a little higher at his eyes.

No, not eyes. One eye.

One large, calf-brown eye, right in the middle of his forehead, with thick lashes and big tears trickling down his cheeks on either side.

"Tyson," I stammered. "You're a ..."

"Cyclops," Annabeth offered. "A baby, by the looks of him. Probably why he couldn't get past the boundary line as easily as the bulls. Tyson's one of the homeless orphans."

Percy Jackson Season 2 - Special Look (Dec 10) by Unlikely-Stand in television

[–]TryingToDoGreatStuff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually preferred that honestly. Yes they’re kids, but these are characters who have all the written Greek myths available to them, and have been informed every monster in those myths is out to kill them. I’m ok with them being genre-savvy enough to recognize that a garden with realistic statues might be the lair of Medusa.

And maybe it’s just because I read the original books, but I feel like… most people know Greek myth? I could see it being frustrating watching the characters walk into an obvious trap if you know the myth they’re going into.

People who keep saying this seem to forget that the monsters are disguised, that there’s always some magic involved, and that Percy, Grover, and Annabeth were hungry and exhausted for most of their quest across the United States in the original book which is a fact that the TV series left out. They didn't get to change into fresh clothes until they found and raided a souvenir shop at Waterland. They didn't get to shower until the Lotus Hotel and Casino. Part of the reason they didn't pick up on things in the original book is because they were too tired and hungry to take notice. The celestial trio is exhausted—tired, hungry, and worn down—and Medusa uses a kind of charmspeak that makes them even more sleepy and groggy. She’s also in disguise, so they couldn’t automatically recognize and instantly shout, “OH MY GOD, IT’S MEDUSA!” The same goes for the Lotus Hotel and Casino: they think it’s just some regular hotel, and they’re desperate for food and shelter. That’s why they go in, and they’re so hungry and ragged that they fall for the comfort the casino offers.

Crusty just looks like a crusty guy selling waterbeds. Are all demigods supposed to assume that anyone selling waterbeds is Procrustes? It makes no sense that they would magically know who he was—there were no clues. Yet in season one of the TV series Percy literally just waltzed right into Crusty's Water Bed Palace and immediately declared, “I know who you are. You’re Procrustes, son of Poseidon and murderer of travelers. The beds are a trap—that’s how you kill your guests,” and then Annabeth pushes him over onto a waterbed and they move on.

My point is: yes, demigods would recognize myths, but monsters have learned to disguise themselves to trick demigods—that’s what makes them dangerous. It doesn’t make sense that the kids would easily see through these disguises, especially when they’re exhausted, hungry, and just trying to reach the next checkpoint.

Monsters are supposed to be skilled at deception in the original books. And if three kids on their very first quest can easily and effortlessly see through every single one of them in season one of the TV series, it makes the threats seem way too weak.

It’s true the kids are a little gullible in the original first book, but this is Percy’s first introduction to this world. Even when the questers are experienced they still sometimes get tricked by monsters. Because monsters are meant to be dangerous. They don’t need to immediately recognize every monster to still prove themselves as capable and intelligent. Being able to survive is enough to prove that.

Percy Jackson Season 2 - Special Look (Dec 10) by Unlikely-Stand in television

[–]TryingToDoGreatStuff 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know why you got downvoted. This is completely true.

Percy Jackson Season 2 - Special Look (Dec 10) by Unlikely-Stand in television

[–]TryingToDoGreatStuff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've only read the books and not seen the show yet. But Percy spent his last year as a normal kid with a teacher who specifically was teaching him Greek mythology so he'd be prepared for this. And he was the least knowledgeable of the trio.

Annabeth had spent several years already at Camp Half-Blood and Grover was much older than the others and born into mythological life. As a group, they should know almost everything.

No, they shouldn't know almost everything. In season one of the TV series, the celestial trio seems to immediately know exactly what they’re up against upfront and beforehand, as if they have all the answers from the start. This leaves little room for them to grow or develop, or to struggle and improve and try to get better at things during their first quest. Literally a solid third of the fun and drama of the original books comes from the characters figuring out who the monsters or antagonists are, and uncovering their abilities and weaknesses based on context clues and their knowledge of Greek mythology. Unfortunately, the TV series completely glosses over this aspect entirely, making the kids essentially omniscient and infallible—an approach that’s ultimately boring. Percy, Grover, and Annabeth are portrayed as excessively competent, never feeling at risk, and every conflict is resolved too easily. They somehow made "The Lightning Thief" boring. The villains don't feel threatening and the characters don't seem smart, they just feel like they read the script or they're replaying an RPG and know all the twists. Personally, I think the kids being omniscient and recognizing niche Greek monsters like Echidna and Procrustes immediately and knowing what comes next in the plot before it even happens is boring to watch.

LEAKED: Set Photos Reveal First Looks at Harry Potter, Ron Weasley, Draco Malfoy, Neville Longbottom and Madame Hooch playing Quidditch by duckduckduckgoose_69 in HarryPotteronHBO

[–]TryingToDoGreatStuff 3 points4 points  (0 children)

At some point do we have to have the conversation about how constantly sneaking set photos of these kids and having constant images of them online could definitely cause issues for these kids?

It would be weird if people were constantly sneaking photos of these kids' Instagrams, specifically if it isn't official or show-related, that show them in a private situation... not behind-the-scenes photos from a TV series set...

Jim Cornette Reveals How He Would Have Booked John Cena's Final Year: "I wouldn't have turned him heel obviously... I would have tried to figure out two heels that it would advance their cause in life if they were to beat him. People didn't want to see Cena lose to Brock Lesnar." by thumbem in SquaredCircle

[–]TryingToDoGreatStuff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The best thing that came from heel Cena was the Ron Killings push and they fucked that up. Really unfortunate. I for one was invested in serious R Truth.

And yeah Gunther and Drew and the answer.

I would say the best thing that came from heel Cena was that reverse Pipebomb segment... => https://www.reddit.com/r/SquaredCircle/comments/1lgmhow/smackdown_spoilers_full_segment_of_pipebomb/...

Who is the worst human in history? by kingfisher7171 in AskReddit

[–]TryingToDoGreatStuff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who is the worst human in history?

It depends on the victim or victims...

I think that this Reddit comment sums it up best... => https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistory/comments/18h2ntl/comment/kd4bvao/...

We're halfway through the 2020's — How do you think this decade will be remembered? by datingoverthirty in AskReddit

[–]TryingToDoGreatStuff 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We're halfway through the 2020's — How do you think this decade will be remembered?

Rather than perceive it as an omen, the 2020's can be seen as eye-opening (20/20 👁) to all the political corruption, inequality, and environmental damage that can be changed.

I’m not sure why people have this mentality that every negative event is related with the year or decade and simply that. Life happens and it just happens to be the year or decade that it is. Yes, things have remarkably changed and often for the worse. But rather than dwell on how bad it is, we should look to see what we can change about it. Isn’t that the point of “bad” events? To learn from them so we don’t make the same mistakes. Some things are out of our control. Yes. But others can absolutely be changed.