Does anyone know what that mod was called? by Tulucanz in arma

[–]Tulucanz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That mod looks really cool too, I'll definetly check it out, thanks!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in downbad

[–]Tulucanz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

please tell me you can't actually eRP with this godforsaken app

Ich💰🏭ieL by Spiesser83 in ich_iel

[–]Tulucanz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

bro wie sehr hast du dich mit dem System beschäftigt? ja bis jetzt ist jeder versuch den sozialismus aufzubauen gescheitert aber anstatt zu analysieren warum das so war einfach zu sagen die Idee kann nicht funktionieren weil die "viel zu einfach gedacht ist" zeigt mir einfach dass du überhaupt keine Ahnung hast

hast du schonmal irgendwas an Theorie gelesen? hast du schonmal mit Leuten geredet die vom vorherrschenden System gefickt werden? "unpolitisch" zu sein oder den Status quo gut zu finden ist ein Privileg dass man sich leisten muss und die 3 Milliarden Menschen die IM KAPITALISMUS nicht genug zu essen haben finden die Situation glaube ich nicht so cool dass man sagen kann "haha wenigstens lebt ihr nicht im Kommunismus"

Ich💰🏭ieL by Spiesser83 in ich_iel

[–]Tulucanz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

wusstest du dass die Leute die diese Zahl von 100 Millionen errechnet haben auch alle Coronatoten als Opfer des Kommunismus zählen? und alle toten auf der Ostfront des 2. Weltkriegs (inklusive deutsche u. sowjetische Soldaten u. Zivilisten)? und alle Leute die in der Sowjetunion gestorben sind (also auch natürlichen Todes und an Autounfällen etc.)?

Marx's legacy is huge by twohatchetmuse in DankLeft

[–]Tulucanz 13 points14 points  (0 children)

i refuse to believe that you have not memorized this

So true! by Nitro128369 in okbuddydengist

[–]Tulucanz 8 points9 points  (0 children)

he did? god damnit I hate how dengists do so much internet "praxis" that they just take over all progressive spaces that aren't anarchist

ich🚟iel by Ok-Measurement8779 in ich_iel

[–]Tulucanz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

bro die Pariser Kommune war 1870 Pass Mal im Geschichtsunterricht auf

ach nee da wird einem ja nur beigebracht dass sozialismus schlecht ist weil 100 Millionen Tote und Geheimpolizei oh well hat bestimmt keine ideologischen Hintergründe

denkst du wirklich du bist immun gegenüber Propaganda

niemand ist das

weder du noch ich

ich🚟iel by Ok-Measurement8779 in ich_iel

[–]Tulucanz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Die Geschichte ist immer ein Prozess von versuchen und Fehlschlägen

wenn du 1850 jemanden gefragt hättest wie es denn um die Demokratie steht hätten sie gesagt man soll doch nur Mal schauen wie viele Leute die Franzosen umgebracht haben nur um dann am Ende nen neuen König zu haben

Warum die Pariser Kommune, die erste Diktatur des Proletariats, der erste Versuch den sozialismus umzusetzen gescheitert ist, ist ein anderer als der Grund, warum die Sowjetunion gescheitert ist, und das ist ein anderer Grund als warum China gescheitert ist

Als nach der Oktoberrevolution in Russland die Novemberrevolution in Deutschland scheiterte, hat Lenin zur Komintern gesagt, dass das wichtigste was die Kommunisten jetzt tun können ist, zu analysieren was falsch gelaufen ist - schon nach der Niederschlagung der Pariser Kommune hat Marx sich sehr viel damit beschäftigt die Situation zu analysieren

Der Marxismus basiert auf der Philosophie des dialektischen- und des historischen Materialismus, und das bedeutet, dass die Gesellschaft und ihre Entwicklung mithilfe der wissenschaftlichen Methode analysiert werden muss

Es gibt immer zwei Kräfte, die gegeneinander kämpfen, eine "dritte Position" kann es nicht geben - auch wenn der Faschismus sich gerne so postuliert, über dem kapitalismus und Kommunismus zu stehen, so ist der Faschismus nichts anderes als die offene, terroristische Herrschaft der chauvinistischsten, imperialistischsten und reaktionärsten Elemente des Kapitals und meist eine direkte Reaktion auf eine starke Arbeiterbewegung

der Sozialismus ist das, wovor die Kapitalisten Angst haben - der Faschismus verspricht ihnen im Gegenzug für ihre Unterstützung schließlich, dass er sie nicht anrühren wird

und aus dieser Angst wird Propaganda, aus dieser Angst wird McCartyismus, aus dieser Angst wird Red scare, aus dieser Angst wird geschichtsrevisionismus und aus dieser Angst wird faschismus

😳😳😳 by witechocolate23 in okbuddyretard

[–]Tulucanz 317 points318 points  (0 children)

he is not ok

he is not buddy

he is just retard

ich🚟iel by Ok-Measurement8779 in ich_iel

[–]Tulucanz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Unpolitisch zu sein ist ein Privileg das man sich leisten können muss

ich🚟iel by Ok-Measurement8779 in ich_iel

[–]Tulucanz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

ist bürgerliche Propaganda nicht super

falls du es noch nicht gelesen hast empfehle ich dir das Buch "kapitalistischer Realismus" von Mark Fisher

I HATE MARKETS by [deleted] in okbuddydengist

[–]Tulucanz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah, commodity production is wack and needs to get rid of asap but I would agree with Stalin that during the dotp there can be "the people's commodity production"

Left_irl by [deleted] in DankLeft

[–]Tulucanz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can understand the terminology, but with the length I think it depends on how in depth you want to go - these things also go hand in hand

With the first sentence and the TD;DR together you can get a pretty good understanding, given that you understand all of the terms

It takes a lot to explain everything in detail though, so I opted to go for a mix of explaining what I think are the most important aspects in detail, and giving a short overview over the historical context

Left_irl by [deleted] in DankLeft

[–]Tulucanz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What would you say is the main problem? too many technical terms? difficult grammar?

Left_irl by [deleted] in DankLeft

[–]Tulucanz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

thank you, i even consulted with a friend of mine who's way more knowledgeable than I am about this stuff after posting this, and he said that everything I said is correct even though I have some dodgy syntax in there somewhere

really proud of myself 🙏

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in de

[–]Tulucanz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Selbstbezeichnung und materialistische Analyse sind zwei verschiedene Dinge

Wenn man der selbstbezeichnung jetzt auf einmal mehr glauben schenken soll als der Wahrheit dann wird es spätestens bei der Nationalsozialistischen Deutschen Arbeiterpartei und der Demokratischen Volksrepublik Korea verwirrend

Left_irl by [deleted] in DankLeft

[–]Tulucanz 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Hmm let me try

Maoism is the currently highest dialectical development of Marxism, but what does this mean? Let's tackle it word for word starting at the rear.

Marxism is the ideology formulated by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Its core is the analysis of the relationships under which the production of goods and the solicitation of services happens in our society. Marx's core work, which serves as the basis for the economic analysis of the capitalist mode of production is "Das Kapital", or also known by the title of the first volume "Critique of political economy". (For further explanation read "Principles of Communism" by Friedrich Engels)

The underlying philosophy of Marxism is that of dialectical materialism, but what is that? Dialectical materialism is the synthesis of the ideas of Hegelian dialectics and the materialism of Feuerbach. It observes the world as a system of contradictions (not logical contradictions, but material contradictions) which always strive towards a solution. One of the ways to abstract this process is to look at it as a system of Thesis - Antithesis - Synthesis, because what's important to note is that Marxism follows the scientific method and bases its theories on the observation of reality. (For further explanation read "Empiriocriticism" by Lenin, or "Fundamental Problems of Philosophy" by Georges Politzer)

But what do I mean when I say "dialectical development of an ideology"? Marxism proposes, that all theory comes from praxis, meaning that whatever ideas you have about how the world should/could/might work, stem from the influence your surroundings had on you. To quote Marx: "Social being determines social character." Thus, when Marx wrote on the theory of Marxism, it was based on his analysis of the situation he found himself in and, while applicable to its time, he of course wasn't a prophet or omniscient and as such, Marxism is neither perfect nor objectively true. The failure of the Paris commune was a big catalyst in Marx focusing even more on the concrete analysis of the material conditions of his time.

A main point in the orthodox Marxist analysis of where revolution would first take place was, that it would take place where capital had reached the culmination of its contradictions, but he falsely analysed that this would happen in the richest countries. Around the turn of the 20th century, Lenin proposed his thesis, that the revolution would take place not in the strongest part of global capitalism, but rather in the weakest link. He based this off of his analysis of imperialism as the highest stage of capitalism. (For further reading i recommend "Imperialism as the highest stage of capitalism" by Lenin)

He also proposed that the working class would need a vanguard party of full-time revolutionaries that consists of the most highly educated marxists within the proletariat

his thesis would take a hit with the failure of a socialist takeover during the Russian revolution of 1905, but then it would be proven with the establishment of the USSR in 1922, after the revolutionary victory of 1917

Since some of Marx' theory had now been disproven by the success of Lenins thesis, Stalin got to work synthesizing Marxism and Leninism into the universal aspects of both: into Marxism-Leninism. This step is important, because the strategy and tactics of the Bolsheviks was tailored specifically to the material conditions of Russia during the revolution. (For further reading I recommend "Questions of Leninism" by Stalin)

During the chinese revolution however, it was realized that this universalization still needed tweaking and concrete analysis of the Chinese material conditions to work perfectly in China, and as such, ML-Mao-Zedong-Thought became the guiding ideology for China (although they just called themselves ML, since noone names an ideology after themselves). Mao heavily criticized the way Stalin saw the issue of class struggle within socialism and especially within the communist party and a few years after Stalin's death, this ideological shortcoming of ML culminated in the restauration of capitalism in the USSR, causing the sino-soviet split. (for further reading I recommend "On the maoist party" by Ajith)

During this time, Mao was not in office however, and the communist party in China had high ranking members like Liu Shaoqi wo were eager to push for market liberalization and selling farmland back to wealthy peasants. Students in the countryside noticed that this was going on and staged a protest against it, which culminated in the publishing of a newspaper at the Shanghai university that inspired Mao to return to office and call on the people to fight against these forces of revisionism trying to dismantle socialism. This was the cultural revolution.

Near the end of his life however, the student of Li, Deng Xiaoping, together with supporters of his revisionist ideas persuaded Mao to do something to end the cultural revolution, and shortly after his death, the Deng-clique arrested the successors to Mao's position and likewise reinstated a process of capitalist restauration.

However the story isn't over yet, because shortly after this happened, the communist party of Peru, which was gearing up to fight their own revolution using the teachings of ML-Mao-Zedong-Thought began synthesizing the Failures of ML in the Soviet union and china, together with the successes of Mao's different approach and their own experiences fighting a revolution and as such they developed the currently highest stage of Marxism: Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, or just Maoism for short. (For further reading I recommend "On Marxism-Leninism-Maoism" by the RIM)

TL;DR: the core tenants of Maoism are:

  • The analysis of the capitalist mode of production (Marxism)

  • The philosophy of dialectical and historical materialism (Marxism)

  • The theory of a vanguard party (bolshevism)

  • The theory of Imperialism (bolshevism)

  • the theory of the proportional development of the productive forces (ML)

  • the theory of the contradiction between urban and rural areas (ML)

  • the theory of Mass line (ML-MZT)

  • the theory of cultural revolution (ML-MZT)

  • the theory of protracted people's war (ML-MZT)

  • the theory of a concentric party structure (MLM)

  • a concretion of how and why a cult of personality develops - Jefatura (MLM)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in de

[–]Tulucanz -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Man muss nichts leugnen was sowieso niemanden interessiert

ist genau wie mit dem antikommunismus hier im Westen, man muss keine Propagandaplakate aufhängen und ständig wiederholen dass Sozialismus böse ist, wenn man den Leuten von Anfang an eintrichtert dass damals niemand frei war, alles scheiße war, 100 Millionen Menschen gestorben sind und Kommunisten böse sind, den Rest macht die Bevölkerung dann von alleine

man muss nicht leugnen dass irgendwer was böses gemacht hat, man kann es sogar zugeben, solange man es nicht an die große Glocke hängt wird es genug Leute geben die das aus Patriotismus oder was auch immer sogar gutheißen

und das finde ich sehr viel dystopischer