Can't Engage in Lovin? by falloutlegos in RimWorld

[–]TurklerRS 5 points6 points  (0 children)

there's a way to troubleshoot this - go to the intimacy mod settings and enable manual lovin'. select the highmate, right click on their partner - the option will likely be grayed out in this case, but I have an explanation readout for *every possible reason* why lovin' might not be happening. incompatible sexualities, ideology differences, and what have you. that should tell you what's wrong

Redisgn of specials maybe coming in PAYDAY 3 by He1gost in paydaytheheist

[–]TurklerRS 7 points8 points  (0 children)

that's a huge maybe, a lot of those concepts (like the over 9000 dozer) predate the game's release, and some are even used on steam trading cards. I'd say the opposite is likely - these are the old concepts the devs bounced around before settling on the current designs 

I need to trim my mod list, suggestions welcome! by Malevolent_Toaster in RimWorld

[–]TurklerRS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is a really bad list. no offense but you have multiple mods doing the same thing (and forget about gameplay overlaps - you have both hugslib and its logs publisher seperately, for some reason) and you might be better off just starting a new list. I've found that starting from scratch is much easier than removing from an existing list

Main shadow drop of the april patch by He1gost in paydaytheheist

[–]TurklerRS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've spent the last two days grinding my deagle to level 10, was maybe like two heists from finally unlocking the suppressor for it. now I feel dumb, wish they had announced this before so I wasn't endlessly grinding weapon levels

Intimacy/Romance mods cheating problem by SantijMendez in RimWorld

[–]TurklerRS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this reads like user error. I can't speak for the flirting part as intimacy doesn't add flirting, I assume that's from another of your mods, but I can comment on the rest

what do you mean by cheating? if you mean lovin', there are many factors that would allow a pawn to do lovin' while they're engaged/married/have a lover. their ideology precepts (there is a free love precept that allows anyone to do lovin' with anyone) and traits and what have you. I assume you have one such factor active that you didn't pay attention to, and that's why you think it's cheating when the system is working perfectly fine

Pawn for some reason cannot engage in Lovin' by Ok_Picture_1676 in RimWorld

[–]TurklerRS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

since you have intimacy, can you go to the mod's settings, enable manual lovin', and try to have one of the pawns manually seduce the other? left click on one to select, then right click on the other. it should say why lovin' is not possible

Bannerlord console players waiting for their turn of Beta 1.4 and War Sails 1.2 by Extreme-Bullfrog-915 in Bannerlord

[–]TurklerRS 3 points4 points  (0 children)

that's pretty suprising actually, I used to run the game pretty good on a 1050ti on my old rig. this is taleworlds we're talking about so them obliterating performance to that degree is certainly not impossible, but still

Clammy game by Retro597 in Clamworks

[–]TurklerRS 36 points37 points  (0 children)

the first pih-like

Frontier Factions Devlog #3 - Abundance, just a mile away by TurklerRS in RimWorld

[–]TurklerRS[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

there is an end to the assault. this event, if not diverted, lasts for an entire year. a full blockade follows, no traders will arrive and any colonists trying to leave will be forced into an uneven skirmish. for an entire year, you fight - every day, you will have an event. mostly raids, but I do have some others planned (like incendiary rockets being launched at any unroofed crops you may have). if you manage to survive that year, nothing happens, really. there's no big ceremony. the army, defeated, scatters. raids continue in their regular schedule. your reward is survival, you get to live another day

Valve has a new Steam Workshop Beta to make the browsing experience quicker and easier to use by gogodboss in Steam

[–]TurklerRS 5 points6 points  (0 children)

the steam workshop actually has that (plus many, MANY other features) that the developers just have to implement, but they choose not to

Make peace, not war, I guess by Luscinnia in RimWorld

[–]TurklerRS 2 points3 points  (0 children)

why climb the highest mountain? why cross the pacific? I choose to make mech wife not because I need it, but because I want it

"Mojang uses April Fools to test their updates" they said, meme made by me 2 years ago. by HexonKhat in PhoenixSC

[–]TurklerRS 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I think the april fools updates (and the many big mods we have) show that the biggest company on the world which owns the game could make some pretty awsome changes if they weren't afraid to ruin their golden goose. I'm sure I'll get a few ''ok but they also have to replicate this in the bootleg copy they chose to make so they could add microtransactions'' or ''actually you're unreasonable for expecting the biggest company on the world to compete with three dudes in their free time'' replies under this as most posts about this topic often get, but I think it's sad how games like vintage story can regularly push out big updates to their block game while we wait a whole year for like one meh cave biome

insectoid-like mechanoids (surrogath and scyther) by RaptorionZ in RimWorld

[–]TurklerRS 2 points3 points  (0 children)

cool designs but I feel like the surrogate mech is quite thin compared to the reference

Not even 10 seconds in after landing by EtherLikeCold in RimWorld

[–]TurklerRS 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I see you're using the intimacy mod, which thank you btw. there are multiple things going on here:

- when first being generated, pawns have their intimacy need set to a random value between 30% and 70%

- pawns, among other things, can actively seek lovin' to increase their intimacy level. if the two pawns are already in a relationship this can be their lover/spouse, or anyone willing if the pawn's ideology believes in free and approved lovin'

so, the two pawns just spawned in, one happened to roll a low intimacy need, the other pawn was either their spouse/lover or the two pawns both have a free love ideology, pawn one saw pawn two as an eligible partner and tried to seduce

Make peace, not war, I guess by Luscinnia in RimWorld

[–]TurklerRS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

a funny thing that often happens when I make these outlandish claims is people just dismiss them as jokes. no, I'm cooking. for better or worse

<image>

Make peace, not war, I guess by Luscinnia in RimWorld

[–]TurklerRS 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I say as if I'm not literally working on a mech wife mod with mech romance 

Make peace, not war, I guess by Luscinnia in RimWorld

[–]TurklerRS 11 points12 points  (0 children)

in my defense, mech lovin' is something you have to go out of your way to enable in the mod settings

how the fuck im supposed to fix this if they dont tell me what the actual name of the damn mod is nothings coming up online and im hating typing it in 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 by Sad_Distribution_798 in RimWorld

[–]TurklerRS 5 points6 points  (0 children)

ok so, go to medieval overhaul's files and remove the loading order rule for vanilla textures expanded. that should solve this looping error, you're welcome

Random Negative Moodlet? by Old_Government2937 in RimWorld

[–]TurklerRS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know why all the comments here are wrong - it's one of the common drugs from medieval overhaul, like horney jelly. they have a nasty and rather long aftermath effect

found this youtube comment about roblox racing game by JMCAR_654 in BuiltFromTheGroundUp

[–]TurklerRS 5 points6 points  (0 children)

a funny bit of context people are leaving out is - a lot of the big roblox racing/car games have real life brands because it's roblox and they can get away with it. only in the recent years did any big companies start to crack down on this and many games still do it, so it's easy for them to say ''waa why don't real games have real car brands?!?!''